Cases

639 F.Supp.2d 877 (2009) STANDARD IRON WORKS, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ARCELORMITTAL; ArcelorMittal USA, Inc.; United States Steel Corporation; Nucor Corporation; Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation; Steel Dynamics, Inc.; AK Steel Holding Corporation; Ssab Swedish Steel Corporation; Commercial Metals, Inc., Defendants. No. 08 C 5214. United States District Court,

OPINION I. Introduction BARZILAY, Judge: This opinion evaluates remand results from the Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Agency”) produced in response to this court’s order in Sinopec Sichuan Vinylon Works v. United States, 30 CIT_, Slip Op. 06-78 (May 25, 2006) (not re

OPINION I. Introduction BARZILAY, Judge: This opinion evaluates remand results from the Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Department”) produced in response to this court’s order in Sinopec Sichuan Vinylon Works v. United States, Slip Op. 06-191, 2006 WL 3929638 (CIT Dec. 28, 2006) (not reported i

Rel: March 24, 2023 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LEON TREHERNE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0854-PWG ) FORSIGHT, LLC, a Delaware Limited ) Liability company, RONALD E. ) HASTINGS, and CYNTHIA R. ) HASTINGS,

ACCEPTED 13-14-00617-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/1/2015 11:44:14 AM

OPINION I. Introduction BARZILAY, Judge: This case evaluates remand results from the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) produced in response to this court’s order in Sinopec Sichuan Vinylon Works v. United States, 29 CIT_, 366 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (2005) (“Sinopec I’).

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISON FOUR D. WAYNE MAYER, TRUSTEE, JOHN J. ) No. ED100587 STOCK TRUST and RONALD J. NOLLE, ) TRUSTEE, OSCAR A. NOLLE TRUST, ) ) Appellants, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Charles County vs.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. TATEL, Circuit Judge: Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 requires that certain government contractors “take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment qualified individuals with disabilities.” Until recently, the Department of Labor’s implementing regulations required government c

Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge Kansas City Power & Light Company (“KCP & L”) appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri (“trial court”), entered on a jury verdict in favor of Ronald and Patricia Basta (“the Bastas”) in their action for the wrongful death of their 31-year-old son, Joseph Basta (“Joey”),

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc RONALD MCLEMORE, ) Opinion issued December 21, 2021 ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SC98987 ) STATE OF MISSOURI, ) )

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PATRICIA POLANCO; VINCENT No. 22-15496 POLANCO; SELENA POLANCO; GILBERT POLANCO, Deceased, D.C. No. 3:21- cv-06516-CRB Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OPINION RALPH DIAZ; ESTATE OF ROBERT S. THARRATT; RONALD DAVIS, Warden; RONALD BROOMFIELD; CLARENCE CRYER; ALISON PACHYNSKI, MD; SHANNON GARRIGAN, MD,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01725-COA BRUCE EVANS COBB AND RONALD APPELLANTS ZACHARY COBB v. DAPHNE COBB APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/24/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES B. PERSONS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Patricia S. Reed, Commissioner, West FILED Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles, May 15, 2015 Respondent Below, Petitioner RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC11-2403 ____________ BRETT A. BOGLE, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ____________ No. SC12-

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: January 24, 2023 Refiled in Redacted Form: March 27, 2023 ************************* E. A., * PUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 18-1587V * v. *

Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge. In a classic (and perhaps ironic) instance of quis custodiet ipsos custodies, we are presented with a case where the Merit Systems Protection Board — the entity charged with addressing the grievances of federal workers challenging discriminatory

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Patricia Damico and Lenna Lucas, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joshua and Brettany Buetow, Edward and Sylvia Dengg, Jonathan and Theresa Douglass, Anthony and Stacey Ray, Danny and Ellen Davis Morrow, Czara and Chad England, Bryan and Cynthia Camara, and Matthew Collins, Respondents, v. Lennar Carolinas, LLC, Spring Grove Plantation Development, Inc., Manale Landscaping, LLC, Super Concrete of

326 F.Supp.2d 1060 (2003) VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., a California Limited Partnership, Defendant. No. 01-CV-09871 RGK(RCX). United States District Court, C.D. California. June 23, 2003. *1061 *1062