Cases

800 P.2d 212 (1990) 110 N.M. 778 Joseph Charles APODACA, Claimant-Appellant, v. FORMWORK SPECIALISTS and Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company, Respondents-Appellees. No. 12271. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. September 6, 1990. Certiorari Denied October 17, 1990. *213 Thomas J. Clear, I

358 S.W.3d 665 (2011) E-Z MART STORES, INC., and FaEllen Yates, as Executrix and Personal Representative of the Estate of James Earl Yates, Appellants, v. RONALD HOLLAND'S A-PLUS TRANSMISSION & AUTOMOTIVE, INC. and Holland R. Inc., Appellees. No. 04-10-00192-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. August 3, 2011. Rehearing Overruled October 11, 2011.

KANNE, Circuit Judge. A superseding indictment charged each defendant with conspiring to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and with using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 924(c). Defendants Lanter, Wilbert (“Will”) and Aaron Ha

TACHA, Circuit Judge. A jury found defendant Ronald J. Cestnik guilty on eight counts of a multi-count indictment involving the distribution of marijuana. Defendant was convicted in count I of conspiracy to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), 841(b)(l)(B)(vii), 846; in count II of conspiracy to launder money in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; in counts III th

OPINION No. 04-10-00192-CV E-Z MART STORES, INC., and FaEllen Yates, as Executrix and Personal Representative of the Estate of James Earl Yates, Appellants v. RONALD HOLLAND’S A-PLUS TRANSMISSION & AUTOMOTIVE, INC. and Holland R. Inc., Appellees

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS COLORADO SUPREME COURT MONDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2017 "Slip opinions" are the opinions delivered by the Supreme Court Justices and are subject to modification, rehearing, withdrawal, or clerical corrections. Modifications to previously posted opinions will be linked to the case number in the petition for rehearing section the day the changes are announced. Click on the case number to

GRANT, Senior District Judge. FACTUAL BACKGROUND At approximately 11:37 p.m. on May 25, 1985, Illinois State Trooper Colin White was sitting in his squad car in the median of Interstate 72 when he observed motorcyclists Ronald Campbell and James Miller approaching in an easterly direction at a speed well in excess of the posted 55 mile per hour limit. •

HUG, Chief Judge: The questions before us are whether the appellants’ state law fraud and breach of contract claims against their former employer are preempted by section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185, and whether them statutory claim was properly dismissed. The district court granted summary judgment to the appellants’ former employer on the appellants’ claims brought under California

CHAISSON, J. Defendant, Ronald Gasser, seeks review of his conviction and sentence for manslaughter. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence used to convict him and contends that his conviction by a non-unanimous jury violated his constitutional rights. In addition, defendant raises issues relating to the trial court's alleged improper admission of other crimes evidence, improper admission of evidence and argument r

CHAISSON, J. Defendant, Ronald Gasser, seeks review of his conviction and sentence for manslaughter. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence used to convict him and contends that his conviction by a non-unanimous jury violated his constitutional rights. In addition, defendant raises issues relating to the trial court's alleged improper admission of other crimes evidence, improper admission of evidence and argument r

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY STAY RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Anthony Pisarski and Sonny Moore have pleaded guilty to, and await sentencing for, conspiracy to manufacture and possess with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846. They move,- however, to have- the Department of Justice-

188 P.3d 1215 (2008) 2008-NMSC-046 Robert FISER, individually, and as a representative of a class of persons within the State of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. DELL COMPUTER CORPORATION, a/k/a Dell, Inc., Defendant-Respondent. No. 30,424. Supreme Court of New Mexico. June 27, 2008. *1217 Morgan Law O

550 F.Supp. 13 (1982) Frank I. SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Bruce KING, Governor of New Mexico, et al., Defendants. Raymond VARGAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Shirley HOOPER, Individually and as Secretary of State of the State of New Mexico, et al., Defendants. D. H. "Chili" YAZZIE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Shirley HOOPER, Secretary of State of New Mexico, et al., Defendants. Ronald G. OLGUIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v.

919 P.2d 1104 (1996) 122 N.M. 39 Denise I. PARKER (f/k/a Denise I. Gillette) and Michael D. Parker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ST. VINCENT HOSPITAL, a New Mexico Non-Profit Corporation, and John Doe, an Unidentified Person/Entity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 15988. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. May 30, 1996. *1105

10 P.3d 166 (2000) 129 N.M. 487 2000-NMCA-077 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO and Mellon Bank, N.A., Trustee of the Public Service Company of New Mexico Master Decommissioning Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John LYONS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 20,575. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. June 22, 2000.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge. I. Introduction On May 20, 2014, Defendant Charter Communications, LLC (“Defendant”), filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On June 16, 2014, Plaintiff Luis Novoa (“Plaintiff’), filed his opposition. Defendant’s reply was filed on June 23, 2014.

HARTZ, Judge (dissenting). I would reverse and remand to require the district court to enter judgment on behalf of Natelson. I should begin by noting that the lead opinion does not represent the views of the majority of the panel. Both Judge Apodaca and I disagree with the analysis in that opinion. Indeed, although Judge Apodaca and I disagree

104 F.3d 367 97 CJ C.A.R. 42 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or

Office of the Director New Mexico 09:27:51 2020.07.10 Compilation '00'06- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2020-NMSC-007 Filing Date: March 19, 2020 No. S-1-SC-36966 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, P

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 12/23/96 TENTH CIRCUIT CHARLES R. FETTY; ALFRED D. AGUERO; ARTHUR A. AGUERO; DAVID L. ALEXANDER; HILARIO ALFONSO, JR.; DAVID R. ALLEE; ROBERT JOHN APODACA; EDWARD J. ARAGON; VIRGIL R. ARAGON; LAWRENCE A. ARCHULETTA; ROBERT J. ARCHULETA; KENNETH R. ARKO; CRISTOBAL ARMIJO; JOHN EDWARD ARMIJO; RICHARD L. ARMSTRONG; EMANUEL AVILLA; SIMON A AYALA; JOE LOUIS BACA; RICHARD J. BACA; DALE W. BANDY; BASILIO A BARELA; DAMIAN