Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ronald H. Musser”
State of Iowa v. Ronald James Brimmerpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–0744 Submitted September 15, 2022—Filed December 22, 2022 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. RONALD JAMES BRIMMER, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dubuque County, Thomas J. Bitter, Judge. A criminal defendant seeks review of the sufficiency of the State’s evidence supporting his second-degree sexual abuse conviction and challenges the trial court’s decision t
State of Iowa v. Ronald James Brimmerpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–0744 Submitted September 15, 2022—Filed December 22, 2022 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. RONALD JAMES BRIMMER, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dubuque County, Thomas J. Bitter, Judge. A criminal defendant seeks review of the sufficiency of the State’s evidence supporting his second-degree sexual abuse conviction and challenges the trial court’s decision t
De Castro v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Teresa De Castro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding her removable for participating in alien smuggling. We have *235jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agenc
De Castro v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Teresa De Castro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding her removable for participating in alien smuggling. We have *235jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agenc
Musser v. Vilsmeier Auction Co., Inc.public domain
522 Pa. 367 (1989) 562 A.2d 279 John H. MUSSER, Appellant, v. VILSMEIER AUCTION CO., INC., Appellee, v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY and Wenger's Farm Machinery, Inc. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 10, 1989. Decided June 30, 1989. *368 Lawrence G. Metzger, Lee Albert, Philadelphia,
Hadad v. Croucherpublic domain
970 F.Supp. 1227 (1997) Norman C. HADAD, Plaintiff, v. Alvin T. CROUCHER, et al., Defendants. No. 1:87 CV 1211. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. January 28, 1997. *1228 *1229 *1230 *1231
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-04-124 CV ____________________
Roberts v. Watsonpublic domain
359 N.E.2d 615 (1977) Ronald G. ROBERTS and Opal V. Roberts, Appellants (Defendants below), v. Richard P. WATSON and Rena Jo Watson, Appellees (Plaintiffs below). No. 2-1174A271. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. February 8, 1977. Rehearing Denied March 31, 1977. *617 Kent H. Musser, Harvey E. McDonald
Jimmy Weed v. Corporal T.R. Jenkinspublic domain
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Jimmy Duane Weed participated in a highway overpass protest. Due to traffic safety concerns,- state troopers told- the protesters to disperse. Weed did not comply. He was arrested. Weed sued, alleging that his arrest violated the First and Fourth Amendments and that the statute authorizing the arrest is invalid. The district cou
956 F.2d 748 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Ronald Leland KELLEY, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Rodney Ray JIRUSKA, Appellant. Nos. 90-1027, 90-1081. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted May 13, 1991.Decided Feb. 5, 1992. Chip J. Lowe, Des Moines, Iowa
GODBOLD, Chief Judge: This action was brought by plaintiff to recover for injuries he sustained while working on board the shrimp boat TIFFANY. Jurisdiction was invoked under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1333(1), 1337, and the general maritime law. Defendants Elizabeth Barwick and he
Wood v. Schuenpublic domain
760 N.E.2d 651 (2001) Robyn WOOD, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Ronald SCHUEN, M.D., Appellee-Defendant. No. 18A04-0012-CV-524. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 31, 2001. Rehearing Denied February 20, 2002. *653 Steven L. Langer, Langer & Langer, Valparaiso, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Michael D. Conner
Kubiczky v. Wesbanco Bank Wheelingpublic domain
541 S.E.2d 334 (2000) Stephen KUBICZKY, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. WESBANCO BANK WHEELING, as Executor of the Estate of Dick Harmath; Anna Harmath Kovacs; and Helen Harmath Laitos, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 27665. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 6, 2000. Decided November 2, 2000.
Star Financial Bank v. Sheltonpublic domain
691 N.E.2d 1338 (1998) STAR FINANCIAL BANK, Appellant (Intervenor-Plaintiff), v. Violet SHELTON and Tom Terry, Appellees, (Intervenors-Defendants). No. 18A04-9708-CV-359. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 9, 1998. *1339 Mark E. Spitzer, Browne Spitzer Herriman Stephenson Holderead & Musser, Marion, for appellant. Jon
Robert Gordon v. Eric Holder, Jr.public domain
KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part: The majority opinion holds that key tax-related provisions of the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act may be unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause’s minimum contacts principle. The majority opinion therefore affirms the District Court’s preliminary injunction barring the Federal Govern
Ben Saidi v. United Statespublic domain
KRAVITZ, Associate Judge: A judge of the Superior Court found appellant Ben Saidi guilty of assault following a non-jury trial. Mr. Saidi appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support his conviction and that the trial judge failed to make adequate “special findings” in accordance with his timely request under Rule 23(c) of the Superior Cour
United States v. Ronald Woodard and Ranier Seeligpublic domain
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge (concurring). In joining the opinion of the Court, I wish to add a few comments with respect to the arguments that the relatively new Illinois disorderly conduct statute (Ill. Rev.Stat.1965, Ch. 38, § 26-1 (a) (1)) is too vague to satisfy the Fourteenth Amendment and also unduly contravenes freedom of speech. It
Morgan v. City of Wheelingpublic domain
516 S.E.2d 48 (1999) 205 W.Va. 34 Gary MORGAN, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. CITY OF WHEELING and the Police Department of the City of Wheeling, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 25420. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted February 16, 1999. Decided June 4, 1999. *50 John F
Constitution Party v. Cortespublic domain
MEMORANDUM STENGEL, District Judge. This is an action brought by three political parties to challenge a portion of Pennsylvania’s Election Code. The Constitution Party of Pennsylvania (CPPA), the Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania (LPPA), the Green Party of Pennsylvania (GPPA), and several party leaders1 contend that the Commonwealth’s ballot access rules violate the First and
Jones v. Wesbanco Bank Parkersburgpublic domain
460 S.E.2d 627 (1995) 194 W.Va. 381 Joseph C. JONES and Debra S. Jones, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, v. WESBANCO BANK PARKERSBURG, Intervening Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 22517. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted May 3, 1995. Decided Filed Jul