⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Ronald Craig Brewer and Kimberly Brewer”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020-07-15 · Published · cited 112× · 965 F.3d 507
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0214p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JOAN ELIZABETH WESER, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
08/19/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 23, 2019 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RONALD AILEY Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamblen County No. 14CR619 Alex E. Pearson, Judge No. E2017-02359-CCA-R3-CD The Defe
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2021-03-04 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010-01-08 · Published · cited 8× · 677 F. Supp. 2d 479
677 F.Supp.2d 479 (2010) In re NEURONTIN MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., and Aetna, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc., et al. MDL NO. 1629. Civil Action No. 04-cv-10981-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 8, 2010.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Amaro v. DeMichaelpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-08-28 · Published · cited 1× · 250 N.E.3d 812; 2024 Ohio 3290
[Cite as Amaro v. DeMichael, 2024-Ohio-3290.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT R. JAMES AMARO, P.C. D/B/A JUDGES: AMARO LAW FIRM : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Plaintiff-Appellant :
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
District Court, N.D. California · 2008-07-10 · Published · cited 6× · 569 F. Supp. 2d 946; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107149; 2008 WL 2754805
(2008) RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff, v. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Austin Semiconductor, L.P., Nanya Technology Corporation, Nanya Technology Corporation U.S.A., Defendants. Rambus Inc., Plaintiff, v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006-06-12 · Published · cited 4× · 433 F. Supp. 2d 172
433 F.Supp.2d 172 (2006) In re NEURONTIN MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS Liability Litigation. This Document Relates to: Harden Manufacturing Corp., et al. v. Pfizer Inc. and Warner-Lambert Co. The Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Pfizer Inc. and Aetna, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. MDL No. 1629. Civil Action No. 04-10981-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massach
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 10× · 808 S.E.2d 488; 256 N.C. App. 401
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-74 Filed: 21 November 2017 Forsyth County, Nos. 10-CVS-6926; 11-CVS-2998, 7119, 7120, 8170-8174, 8338; 12- CVS-4851, 4853-4859, 4861-4870, 4873-4876, 4916, 5953-5961, 5963, 6321, 6322, 6652, 7721, 8189; 13-CVS-1645, 4506, 6794, 7129; 14-CVS-4803-4806, 4808, 4809, 5702, 5703, 6311; 15-CVS-0301, 0610, 2471-2532, 3208-3231, 4011-4016, 4655-4657, 5447, 5448, 6744, 7770-777
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2014-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-14-01021-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 14-14-01021-CV 12/29/2014 10:03:31 PM
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-05-11 · Published · cited 0×
05/11/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 12, 2020 MARCUS THURMAN WADE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County No. 44130 L. Craig Johnson, Judge ___________________________________
District Court, D. Vermont · 2002-04-15 · Published · cited 2× · 247 F. Supp. 2d 486; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25875; 2002 WL 32050316
247 F.Supp.2d 486 (2002) In re: NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY No. 2:97-CV-314. United States District Court, D. Vermont. April 15, 2002. *488 Richard R. Goldsborough, Esq., Perry, Schmucker & Goldsborough, PLLC, South Burlington, VT, Debra Brewer Hayes, Esq., Christopher Kesler, Esq., Fleming, Hovenkamp & Grayson, P.C., Houston
Trump v. Andersonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-03-04 · Published · cited 3× · 601 U.S. 100
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 601 U. S. Part 1 Pages 100–123 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT March 4, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Freed v. Salaspublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009-12-01 · Published · cited 46× · 780 N.W.2d 844; 286 Mich. App. 300
780 N.W.2d 844 (2010) 286 Mich. App. 300 FREED v. SALAS. Docket No. 283317. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted June 9, 2009, at Detroit. Decided December 1, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. *849 Fieger, Fieger, Kenney, Johnson & Giroux, P.C. (by Victor S. Valenti), Southfield, for plaintiff.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-08-20 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER BROOK FISHBECK, et al., ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et ai., Plaintiffs, Case No. 18-cv-2248 (CRC) V. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Public Version of ECF 387) I. BACKGROUND ......cccsc0 _ vee 3 II. LEGAL STANDARDS . 7 A. JURISDICTION AND LIABILITY ....sssccssssscsseeeecenees 7 B. DAMAGES 8 Ill. ANALYSIS 9 A. JURISDICTION AND LIABILITY 9 1. ATTACKS 1, 3-9, 11-19, 21-28, 30-39, 41-52, 5465... .ccccccseccseeneeees
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-01-31 · Published · cited 5× · 225 N.E.3d 728; 2023 IL App (5th) 230035
2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-04-24 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC, No.22-56181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-01710- v. JVS-GJS CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation, ORDER AND AMENDED Defendant-Appellee, OPINION and BR
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-12-04 · Published · cited 13× · 135 F.4th 645
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC, No. 22-56181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-0171f0- v. JVS-GJS CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation, OPINION Defendant-Appellee, and BRANDON STUMP, an individual; RYAN STUMP, an individual; KEITH
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015-11-12 · Published · cited 0× · 143 F. Supp. 3d 307; 2015 WL 7009443
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION JOY FLOWERS CONTI, Chief District Judge. I. Introduction Pending before the court are two motions for sanctions for spoliation of evidence filed by plaintiff André Jacobs (“plaintiff’) against a host of defendants associated with the Allegheny County Jail (“ACJ”) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.1