Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ronald B Thomas”
L.B. Boudreaux's Trucking, L.L.C. v. Thomaspublic domain
In re National Fire & Marine Insurance Company; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. G, No. 2013-2169; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2014-C-0536. Denied. VICTORY, GUIDRY and CLARK, JJ., would grant.
THOMAS LAVIGNE * NO. 2018-CA-0066 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL ALLIED SHIPYARD, INC., * RONALD L. CALLAIS, THE FOURTH CIRCUIT GRAY INSURANCE * COMPANY, INC., D/B/A GRAY STATE OF LOUISIANA & COMPANY, INC., ANNE ******* PAIGE LOWENBURG, AND PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY CONSOLI
in Re Ronald Thomas Drakos, IIpublic domain
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 28, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00483-CR IN RE RONALD THOMAS DRAKOS II, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas
Ronald Thomas v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 17, 2017. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00355-CR RONALD THOMAS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 339th District Court Harris County, Texas Tri
Taylor v. Thomaspublic domain
648 S.E.2d 426 (2007) TAYLOR v. THOMAS. No. A07A0595. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 20, 2007. *427 Adam Ferrell, Waycross, for Appellant. Thomas & Settle, Ronald Banks Thomas, Waycross, for Appellee. MILLER, Judge. Denny L. Taylor filed a complaint against R.D. Thomas, Jr., Pierce County, the City of
Affirmed as Modified and Opinion filed October 29, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Ronald A. Baptist v. Robinsonpublic domain
49 Cal.Rptr.3d 153 (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 151 Ronald A. BAPTIST, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Thomas ROBINSON, Jr., Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Appellant. Thomas Fogarty Winery, LLC., Defendant, Cross-Defendant and Respondent. No. H029233. Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District. September 21, 2006.
Thomas v. United Statespublic domain
KING, Senior Judge: After a jury trial, Todd Matthew Thomas was convicted of five counts of first-degree burglary, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-801(a) (2007 Supp.) (one count each from the B.C., C.T., F.H., W.C., and M.C. incidents); one count of attempted second-degree burglary (the S.C. incident), in violation of D.C.Code §§ 22-801(b), -1808 (2007 Supp.); two counts of assault (one count from the W.C. incident and one cou
In Re Thomaspublic domain
181 B.R. 674 (1995) In re THOMAS, Greg Scott, Sr., Thomas, Phyllis Diane, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 94-50356. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia, Waycross Division. May 16, 1995. *675 Jeffrey D. Garmon, Waycross, GA, for debtors. Ronald B. Thomas, Waycross, GA, for Mr. Amos Odom. Sylvia Ford Brown, Chapter 13 Truste
American Hospital Association v. Thomas Pricepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 15, 2017 Decided August 11, 2017 No. 17-5018 AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL., APPELLEES v. THOMAS E. PRICE, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for th
Thomas R. Jones v. United Statespublic domain
KRÁVITZ, Associate Judge: Appellant Thomas R; Jones was tried before a Superior Court jury in March 2011 on charges of first-degree premeditated murder while armed, assatilt with intent to kill while armed, aggravated assault while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, carrying a pistol without a license in a gun-free zone, and possession
Thomas v. United Statespublic domain
RUIZ, Associate Judge, Retired: Two appeals arising from the same criminal conviction are before the court. In 2008, an indictment was filed charging appellant with two counts of sexual abuse. Prior to trial, appellant filed a motion to dismiss one of the counts as violative of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. He also filed a motion under Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure 8(a) and 1
KAREN MOULTON, * NO. 2020-CA-0090 INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS * SIMILARLY SITUATED COURT OF APPEAL * VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT * STEWART ENTERPRISES, STATE OF LOUISIANA INC., JOHN B. ELSTROTT, JR., * * * * * * * THOMAS M. KITCHEN, ALDEN J. MCDONALD, JR., RONAL
KAREN MOULTON, * NO. 2020-CA-0090 INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS * SIMILARLY SITUATED COURT OF APPEAL * VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT * STEWART ENTERPRISES, STATE OF LOUISIANA INC., JOHN B. ELSTROTT, JR., * * * * * * * THOMAS M. KITCHEN, ALDEN J. MCDONALD, JR., RONAL
In re Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.public domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
In re Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.public domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Ronald Thomas Drakos II v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 14, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00389-CR RONALD THOMAS DRAKOS II, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court
In re Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.public domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
In Re Ronald Thomas Drakos II v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Opinion issued October 10, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00732-CR NO. 01-24-00733-CR ——————————— IN RE RONALD THOMAS DRAKOS II, Relator Original Proceeding on
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The majority’s creation — from whole cloth — of a substantial-compliance standard in Part VI is a dramatic judicial amendment of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”) without textual or precedential justification. It is both a usurpation of regulatory authority and an invitation for courts to engage in arbitrary decisionmaking. And, the majority pro