Cases

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

RULING JUDGE JAMES J. BRADY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This matter is before the Court pursuant. to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1966 (“Section 2”), 52 U.S.C. § 10301 (previously codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1973), and the Fourteenth and. Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. A bench trial was held on March 13-20 and April 26-28, 2017. The Court heard from 27 witnesses, and over 3

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS BETH BLOOM, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Defendant Branch Banking and Trust Company’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. [78]. The Court has reviewed the motion, all supporting and opposing filings, and the record in this case, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. For the reasons that follow, D

Peterson, Judge. An electrical worker shuts off the circuit breaker to allow him and his colleague to work on wires. But the circuit breaker was mislabeled (or so we must presume on summary judgment), and the circuit remains live. After the worker’s colleague is shocked and tells the worker so, the worker — adamant he turned off the circuit — climbs a ladder to investigate what shocked his colleague. After a few brief seconds

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part III.C. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 276 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT

683 F.Supp.2d 1006 (2010) COMMUNITY OF CHRIST COPYRIGHT CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEVON PARK RESTORATION Branch of Jesus Christ's Church, et al., Defendants. Case No. 08-00906-CV-W-GAF. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division. January 14, 2010. *1010 Elizabeth A. Tassi, J. David Wharton, Mark McKay

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BETH BLOOM, District Judge THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Branch Banking and Trust Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. [143], (“BB & T Motion”) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendant’s Fifth, Sixth, Thirty-Eighth, and Thirty-Ninth Affirmative Defenses, ECF No. [138] (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”) (collectively

OPINION WILLIAM J. BOYCE, Justice. The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (“UTMB”) appeals an order denying its plea to the jurisdiction. We reverse and render judgment dismissing Kai Hui Qi’s suit against UTMB for lack of jurisdiction. Background Appellee Kai Hui Qi sued UTMB, Virginia Rauth

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, the Estate of Frieda M. Wilmes through its appointed fiduciary, Claudette Schenck, Robert K. Espel, and James C. Matacía (collectively “Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and all other similarly-situated employees and retirees, appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants Anthem, In

613 F.Supp.2d 1140 (2009) COMMUNITY OF CHRIST COPYRIGHT CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEVON PARK RESTORATION BRANCH OF JESUS CHRIST'S CHURCH et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:08-CV-00906-GAF. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division. April 23, 2009. *1141 Elizabeth A. Tassi, J. David Wharton, Mark M

OPINION MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice. This case involves a Medical Liability Act claim for damages arising from allegedly negligent health care treatment. Appellant, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (“UTMBG”), brings an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss based on the asserted inadequacy

SouthTrust Bank of Dothan, N.A. ("SouthTrust") filed a complaint against defendants A.G. Branch and Clint Owens in the Houston County Circuit Court, alleging default by Branch and Owens on a promissory note. A default judgment was entered against Owens, and the court entered a Rule 54(b), A.R.Civ.P., certification of finality on July 3, 1986. On June 13, 1986, Branch filed an answer to SouthTrust's complaint and a cross-claim against Owens. On July 10, 1986, SouthTrust filed a motion

17 F.3d 1434NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronald B. TAYLOR, Plaintiff Appellant,v.Ricky ROBINSON; Waverly MacWilliams; Sargeant Mills; I.A.Branch; Mr. Creighton-Bey, Defendants and Appellees.

83 F.Supp.2d 631 (2000) Kevin D. BRANCH, as parent and Guardian ad Litem for Kevin Devon Branch, Jr., a minor, Plaintiff, v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY CONSOLIDATED f/k/a Piedmont Coca Cola Bottling, and Coca Cola Company, Defendants. CA No. 0:99-4014-19. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division. February 9, 2000.

PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge. In this appeal Petitioner Ronald L. Spencer seeks review of the dismissal of his individual right of action (IRA) appeal by the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board). He complains that he was denied a fair hearing before the Board. According to Mr. Spencer, at the hearing, the Administrative Judge (AJ) confused the issue of the Board’s jurisdiction

254 F.3d 617 (6th Cir. 2001) Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gayle Bowles; Richard Kemp; Ronald Stratton, Defendants-Appellants. No. 00-3159 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Argued: May 2, 2001Decided and Filed: June 19, 2001 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dist

HORTON, j. In this declaratory judgment action, see RSA 491:22 (1997), the Superior Court (Barry, J.) ruled that the plaintiffs, *309Ronald L. and Marjorie A. Calabraro, were entitled to $37,500 in uninsured motorist coverage pursuant to their policy with the defendant, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company. The defendant appeals, arguing

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-24-00030-CV DAVID LYNN, APPELLANT V. RONALD FERGUSON, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 348th District Court Tarrant

619 F.Supp. 846 (1985) NAACP, JEFFERSON COUNTY BRANCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The Honorable William E. BROCK, Secretary, United States Department of Labor, in His Official Capacity, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 82-2315. United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 10, 1985. *847 Thomas D. Goldberg, Ronald A. Ste

RENDERED: DECEMBER 6, 2024; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2024-CA-0109-MR JAMIE YOUNT APPELLANT APPEAL FROM WHITLEY CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE DANIEL BALLOU, JUDGE ACTION NO. 23-CI-00428 RONALD CANADA; BRIAN YOUNT; LOUISE YOUN