⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Ron Molles”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994-02-02 · Published · cited 9× · 15 F.3d 122; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1524; 1994 WL 25082
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. Ronald C. Keller (“Keller”) appeals a grant of summary judgment by the District Court 1 in favor of Bass Pro Shops, Inc. (“Bass Pro”), and the denial of his cross-motion for summary judgment. We affirm, although our affirmance is on grounds different from those relied upon by the District Court.
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022-08-23 · Published · cited 0×
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2018-12-10 · Published · cited 0× · 340 F. Supp. 3d 619
HON. KEITH P. ELLISON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs brought this Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") suit as a putative collective action on behalf of themselves and other employees of JPMorgan Chase *621call centers. In addition to alleging violations of the FLSA, Plaintiffs seek recovery under Texas common law, Ohio's Minimum Fair Wa
Bryant v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991-02-18 · Published · cited 1× · 304 Ark. 514; 803 S.W.2d 546; 1991 Ark. LEXIS 90
Robert H. Dudley, Justice. Appellant Tommy Bryant was convicted of the offenses of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver and possession of marijuana with intent to deliver. He was sentenced to a total of eighty (80) years in prison. We affirm the judgments of conviction. Since sufficiency of the evidence is not questioned, we need not recite the details of the crimes.
Sumner v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991-10-09 · Published · cited 1× · 35 Ark. App. 203; 816 S.W.2d 623; 1991 Ark. App. LEXIS 532
John E. Jennings, Judge. Harvey Sumner was found guilty by a Hempstead County jury of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. Sumner was sentenced to a total of nineteen years imprisonment. On appeal four arguments are made: (1) that the trial court improperly refused to instruct the jury on entrapment; (2) that the c
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021-08-31 · Published · cited 12× · 207 Conn. App. 28
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 2003 WI 57; 663 N.W.2d 275; 262 Wis. 2d 99; 2003 Wisc. LEXIS 426
262 Wis.2d 99 (2003) 2003 WI 57 663 N.W.2d 275 STATE of Wisconsin EX REL. The CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. CIRCUIT COURT FOR MILWAUKEE COUNTY, the Honorable Dominic Amato, presiding, The Honorable Michael J. Skwierawski, Chief Judge, First Judicial Circuit, Hidden Oaks Homeowners Assoc., Gerald Nagel, Cindy Nagel, Hollie Jambretz, Ann Philips, Ray Maciejewski, Tina Stewart, Ronald Wi
Ashlock v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998-12-16 · Published · cited 4× · 983 S.W.2d 448; 64 Ark. App. 253; 1998 Ark. App. LEXIS 820
983 S.W.2d 448 (1998) 64 Ark.App. 253 Curtis ASHLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CA CR 98-157. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II. December 16, 1998. *450 Robert C. Marquette, Van Buren, for appellant. Winston Bryant, Atty. Gen., Sandy Moll, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock,
Hulick v. Beerspublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009-04-01 · Published · cited 3× · 7 So. 3d 1153; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2950; 2009 WL 838249
7 So.3d 1153 (2009) Sheila M. HULICK and The Reynolds and Reynolds Company, an Ohio corporation registered to do business in Florida, Appellants, v. Stephen J. BEERS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lesley N. Beers, Appellee. Nos. 4D07-3703, 4D07-4641. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 1, 2009. Rehearing Denied May 28, 2009
Clark v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994-01-31 · Published · cited 7× · 870 S.W.2d 372; 315 Ark. 602; 1994 Ark. LEXIS 45
870 S.W.2d 372 (1994) 315 Ark. 602 Ronald Dean CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 93-1034. Supreme Court of Arkansas. January 31, 1994. *373 Joe Kelly Hardin, Benton, for appellant. Sandy Moll, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee. HOLT, Chief Justice. Rona
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005-08-19 · Published · cited 0× · 419 F.3d 794
BYE, Circuit Judge. Kenneth B. Moll, and his firm Kenneth B. Moll & Associates Ltd. (KBM), and K. Amy Lemon, appeal the district court’s order imposing sanctions against them for their conduct in the Baycol Multi-District Litigation (MDL). Pursuant to its inherent power, the district court removed Moll and KBM from the plaintiffs’ steering committee (PSC) and imposed a $50,0
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005-08-19 · Published · cited 19× · 419 F.3d 794; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17577
419 F.3d 794 PLAINTIFFS' BAYCOL STEERING COMMITTEE, Plaintiff,Kenneth B. Moll; Kenneth B. Moll & Associates, Ltd., Appellants,v.BAYER CORPORATION; Bayer AG; GlaxoSmithKline, Defendants — Appellees.Plaintiffs' Baycol Steering Committee, Plaintiff,K. Amy Lemon, Appellant,v.Bayer Corporation; Bayer AG; GlaxoSmithKline, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-2097. No. 04-21
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015-11-10 · Published · cited 0× · 195 So. 3d 815; 40 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1492; 2015 Miss. App. LEXIS 572; 2015 WL 6875331
CARLTON, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Dr. Michael Molleston appeals River Oaks Hospital’s decision to deny his application for medical-staff privileges. We find that River Oaks violated Dr. Molleston’s due-process rights and its own bylaws when it allowed a physician to actively participate in two stages of the administrative process. We therefore reverse the Rankin County Chancery Court’s judgment and remand thi
Daffron v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994-10-10 · Published · cited 10× · 885 S.W.2d 3; 318 Ark. 182; 1994 Ark. LEXIS 539
885 S.W.2d 3 (1994) 318 Ark. 182 Rickey Hale DAFFRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 94-282. Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 10, 1994. Harold W. Madden, North Little Rock, for appellant. Sandy Moll, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee. HOLT, Chief Justice. The appellant, Rickey Hale Daffron,
King v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994-06-13 · Published · cited 42× · 877 S.W.2d 583; 317 Ark. 293; 1994 Ark. LEXIS 366
877 S.W.2d 583 (1994) 317 Ark. 293 Daniel Lee KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 93-1171. Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 13, 1994. *585 Larry Dean Kissee, Ash Flat, for appellant. Sandy Moll, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee. HAYS, Justice. Daniel Lee K
Dansby v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999-10-07 · Published · cited 16× · 1 S.W.3d 403; 338 Ark. 697; 1999 Ark. LEXIS 509
1 S.W.3d 403 (1999) 338 Ark. 697 Joe Louis DANSBY v. STATE of Arkansas. No. CR 97-1415. Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 7, 1999. *405 Bramblett & Pratt, by: Eugene D. Bramblett, Camden, for appellant. Mark Pryor, Att'y Gen., by: Sandy Moll, Asst. Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.
Swanson v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992-01-21 · Published · cited 4× · 823 S.W.2d 812; 308 Ark. 28; 1992 Ark. LEXIS 31
823 S.W.2d 812 (1992) 308 Ark. 28 Todd Jarrell SWANSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 91-174. Supreme Court of Arkansas. January 21, 1992. John Wesley Hall, Jr., Craig Lambert, Little Rock, for appellant. *813 Sandy Moll, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee. DUDLEY
Superior Court of Delaware · 2017-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROBERT STINSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. Nl6C-05-l35 VLM ) HOME DEPOT USA, INC.; ) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Submitted: February l6, 2017 Decided: April 20, 2017 ORDER Upon Consideration ofDefendant Home Depot USA, Inc. ’S Motionfor Jua'gment on the Pleaa'ings, GRANTED. AND NOW TO WIT, this 20th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Home Depot USA, Inc. (“Horne Depot”)’s Motion for Judgment o
Cavin v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993-05-24 · Published · cited 10× · 855 S.W.2d 285; 313 Ark. 238; 1993 Ark. LEXIS 323
855 S.W.2d 285 (1993) 313 Ark. 238 Ernest Metcalf CAVIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 92-978. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 24, 1993. *286 Dale Price, Robert J. Price, Little Rock, for appellant. Sandy Moll, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee. HOLT, Chief Justic