Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Romero v. Three Fish, Inc.”
Wildlife Preserves v. Romeropublic domain
24-776-cv Wildlife Preserves v. Romero United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2024 Argued: February 13, 2025 Decided: August 22, 2025 No. 24-776-cv WILDLIFE PRESERVES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
Romero v. Shihpublic domain
Filed 5/5/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT TATANA SPICAKOVA ROMERO B310069 et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants Super. Ct. No. EC064933) and Appellants, v. LI-CHUAN SHIH et al., Defendants, Cross- complainants and Respondents; U.S. BANK
Fish v. Kobachpublic domain
HOLMES, Circuit Judge. INTRODUCTION In this case, we -must resolve whether section 5 of the National Voter Registration Act (the “NVRA”), 52 U.S.C. § 20504, preempts a Kansas law requiring documentary proof of citizenship (“DPOC”) for voter registration, Kan. Stat. Ann. § 25-2309©, as applied to the federally mandated .voter-registration form that must b
Romero v. Allstate Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge. Currently pending before the Court is the Motion by Plaintiffs Gene R. Romero, et al. to Compel Documents Related to the Release in Accordance with the Court’s April 7, 2010 Case Management Order. For the following reasons, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The core of Plainti
People v. Romeropublic domain
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
Ciba-Geigy Ltd. v. Fish Peddler, Inc.public domain
691 So.2d 1111 (1997) CIBA-GEIGY LIMITED, BASF A.G., International Fertilizer Limited, Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc., and Del Monte Fresh Produce Co., N.A., Appellants, v. The FISH PEDDLER, INC., Pink Star Corporation, Lango-Taura S.A., et al., Appellees. No. 96-1536. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 26, 1997. Rehearing and Rehea
Stark-Romero v. National Railroad Passenger Co.public domain
805 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2011) Victoria STARK-ROMERO, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred P. Stark, Plaintiff, and Emilio J. Esquibel and Helen G. Esquibel, Individually and as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Michael S. Esquibel, deceased, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. The NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER COMPANY (AMTRAK), Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF), City of Las Vegas, San Miguel County an
611 F.3d 692 (2010) FOREST GUARDIANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee, and The Peregrine Fund, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. Environmental Defense Fund, New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association, Amicus Curiae. No. 08-2226. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 7, 2010.
State v. Romeropublic domain
*63JUSTICE NELSON delivered the Opinion of the Court. Aaron D. Romero (Romero) appeals from the judgment entered by the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Big Horn County, finding him guilty of wasting or abandoning the carcass of an antelope in the field, a misdemeanor, hunting elk while privileges are suspend
Kiehne v. N.M. Dep't of Game & Fishpublic domain
The slip opinion is the first version of an opinion released by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. Once an opinion is selected for publication by the Court, it is assigned a vendor-neutral citation by the Clerk of the Court for compliance with Rule 23-112 NMRA, authenticated and formally published. The slip opinion may contain deviations from the formal authenticated opinion. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: __________ 3 Filin
Doe I v. Cisco Systems, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOE I; DOE II; IVY HE; DOE III; No. 15-16909 DOE IV; DOE V; DOE VI; CHARLES LEE; ROE VII; ROE VIII; D.C. No. 5:11-cv- LIU GUIFU; DOE IX; WEIYU 02449-EJD WANG, and those individuals similarly situated, ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.; JOHN CHAMBERS; FREDY CHEUNG, AKA Zhang Sihua; DOES, 1-100,
268 F.Supp.2d 1197 (2003) HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; California Chamber of Commerce; Construction Materials Association of California; Building Industry Legal Defense Foundation; California Alliance for Jobs; Steven M. DeLucchi; and Mary O. DeLucchi, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILLIFE SERVICE; Department of the Interior; Gale A. Norton, Secretary of the Interior; and Marshall P. Jones, Jr., Acting Director of the
Hall v. Romeropublic domain
141 Ariz. 120 (1984) 685 P.2d 757 Gwendolyn HALL, a divorced woman; W.J. Spranger and Alta Marie Spranger, husband and wife, Clarence W. Siewert and Rose Zeena Siewert, husband and wife, Robert A. Celaya and Lucy L. Celaya, husband and wife, R.J. Gillespie and Una Gillespie, husband and wife, Charles Hall and Lois Hall, husband and wife, Darrel L. Lawson, a married man, Raymond J. Herst, a widower, Jacquelyn Herst, a single woman,
Landry v. Joey's, Inc.public domain
THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Terese Landry appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Joey's Inc. d/b/a Joey's Specialty Food. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that her consumption of a fried shrimp po-boy sandwich from Defendant's food store caused her to become ill with food poisoning. Defendant moved for summary judgment thereafter, contending that Plaintiff could not prove by a preponderance of
Landry v. Joey's, Inc.public domain
THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Terese Landry appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Joey's Inc. d/b/a Joey's Specialty Food. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that her consumption of a fried shrimp po-boy sandwich from Defendant's food store caused her to become ill with food poisoning. Defendant moved for summary judgment thereafter, contending that Plaintiff could not prove by a preponderance of
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Fish & Game Commissionpublic domain
42 F.3d 1278 SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.FISH & GAME COMMISSION, IDAHO, sued as: Idaho Fish & GameCommission; Jerry Conley, individually and in his officialcapacity as Director of Idaho Fish and Game; RichardMeiers; Norm Guth; Louis Racine; Wesley Rose, et al.,Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35280. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circui
Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.public domain
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed March 23, 2018 (Doc. 27)("MTD"). The Court held a hearing on August 10, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the applicable statutes of limitations bar Plaintiff Janice Nowell's claims against Defendants Medtronic Inc., Covidien PLC, Covidien LP, and Medtronic PLC for negligence, strict
Superior Fish Co., Inc. v. Royal Globe Ins. Co.public domain
521 F.Supp. 437 (1981) SUPERIOR FISH CO., INC. v. ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE CO. and Jugolinija and Insurance Company of North America. Civ. A. No. 80-4473. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. September 9, 1981. *438 Kenneth S. Siegel, Malis, Tolson & Malis, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff Superior Fish. Robe
BEEZER, Circuit Judge: The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (Tribes) challenge an order of the Idaho Fish and Game Commission (Fish and Game) prohibiting all fishing for Spring Chinook Salmon during the summer of 1991 in an area of the Salmon River traditionally fished by the Tribes. The district court dismissed the action as moot and as barred by the Eleventh Amendment. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and re
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL No. 22-1804 CENTER, INC., NLRB No. Petitioner, 28-CA-213783 v. ORDER AND NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS AMENDED BOARD, OPINION Respondent, --------------------------