Cases

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court1 on the Social Security Administrative Record [#14],2 filed September 23, 2014, in support of Plaintiffs Complaint [#1] seeking review of the decision of Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, (“Defendant” or “Commission

ORDER AND JUDGMENT** ROBERT H. HENRY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Lynette Romero appeals from an order of the district court affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying her applications for Social Security disability and Supplemental Security Income benefits (SSI). We have determined that the Commissioner failed to evaluate properly the opinion of her treating physici

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CANDELARIA DE LOS ANGELES No. 23-576 CORPENO-ROMERO; JAVI Agency Nos. ALEXANDER CORNEJO- A215-944-680 CORPENO, A215-944-681 Petitioners, OPINION v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Resp

Office of the Director New Mexico 11:32:18 2022.07.26 Compilation '00'06- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMSC-009 Filing Date: February 15, 2021 No. S-1-SC-38396 MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM, Governor of New Mexico; KATHYLEEN KUNKEL, Secretary of the

MEMORANDUM OPINION Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge Before the Court are petitioners’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 24] and respondents’ Motion to Dismiss in Part [Dkt. No. 27] and Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 28]. The motions have been fully briefed, oral argument has been heard, and for the reasons discussed in this Memorandum Opinion,

MEMORANDUM ** Marco Antonio Romero, a native and citizen of El Salvador, and Marlen Janet Romero, a native and citizen of Honduras, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying Marco Romero’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), cancellation of r

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION THOMAS J. CATLIOTA, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the court is a motion to dismiss the bankruptcy case of the debtor Peter Romero filed by Ralph S. Janvey, in his capacity as a court-appointed receiver for the Stanford International Bank Ltd. (the “Receiver”). ECF 91. The debtor opposes the motion. ECF 105. For the reasons in this Memorandum, the court will deny the motion.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed May 5, 2016 (Doc. 97)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on August 8, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether Plaintiff Michelle Romero, as sister and next friend of Alejandro Romero, Jr., sufficiently states a claim

SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. Justice Wecht delivers the Opinion of the Court with respect to Part II(A) and announces the Judgment of the Court. The Opinion is joined in full by Justices Todd and Donohue and Justice Mundy joins Part II(A). OPINION JUSTICE WECHT In these discretionary appeals, we consider an unsettled quest

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Wilkinson wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge Gregory and Judge Harris joined. WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Appellee Peter Romero filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition after he was found hable for $1.275 million to the victims of a multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme. Appellant Ralph Ja

Mark R. Hornak, United States District Judge. The Defendant Mario Nelson Reyes-Romero ("Defendant") was administratively removed from the United States in 2011, and he was discovered back in the United States in 2017 without permission from the necessary officials of the federal government, resulting in his indictment for one count of Reentry of Removed Alien,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOSE ARMANDO ANDRADE ROMERO, et al. Plaintiffs, Civ. Action No. 18-00179 (EGS) v. RBS CONSTRUCTION CORP., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiffs Jose Armando Andrade Romero and Victorino Marroquin (collectively “Plaintiffs”) bring this case against Defendants RBS Construction Corp.

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT __________ No. 19-1923 __________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. MARIO NELSON REYES-ROMERO __________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1850 JESUS HUMBERTO ZUNIGA ROMERO, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Argued: May 8, 2019 Decided: August 29, 2019 B

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 19-3687 PATRICIA L. ROMERO, APPELLANT, V. DAT P. TRAN, ACTING SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued October 15, 2020

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE EASYSAVER REWARDS No. 16-56307 LITIGATION, D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02094- JOSUE ROMERO; DEANNA HUNT; BAS-WVG KIMBERLY KENYON; GINA BAILEY; ALISSA HERBST; GRANT JENKINS; BRADLEY BERENTSON; JENNIFER OPINION LAWLER; DANIEL COX; JONATHAN WALTER; CHRISTOPHER DICKEY,

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. DOWDELL, District Judge. Plaintiff Michael Romero brought this civil rights action against his former employer, the City of Miami, Oklahoma, several of its officers, and two other municipal entities. Romero, the City’s former Chief Financial Officer, claims that he was forced to undergo an unconstitutional drug and alcohol screening and then was unlawfully fired whe

692 F.Supp.2d 223 (2010) Magaly RIVERA-QUINTANA, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendants. Civil No. 06-1791 (SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 11, 2010. *224 Salvador Medina-de-la-Cruz, Salvador Medina de la Cruz Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Ginette L. Milanes, United St

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion for Leave to Intervene, filed December 3, 2015 (Doc. 37)(“Motion”). The primary issue is whether the Court should, pursuant to rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, allow Correct Care Solutions, the company that provided medical services to the Curry County D

*354 OPINION KLEINFELD, Senior Circuit Judge: We address the “principal reason” standard for withholding of removal, and also the acquiescence and relocation standards for Convention Against Torture relief. At issue is why Raul Barajas-Romero was tortured and whether he can be retu