⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Roman v. PNC Bank”

District Court, D. Hawaii · 2019-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 386 F. Supp. 3d 1339
Leslie E. Kobayashi, United States District Judge Before the Court is Plaintiffs Christopher Carpenter, Mary T. Bulzomi, Daniel K. Iwasaki, Bernie L. Acoba, Roman Gulla Bibat, and Angie Siapno Bibat's ("Plaintiffs") Motion for Order of Remand ("Motion"), filed on February 28, 2019. [Dkt. no. 13.] Defendant PNC Bank, N.A. ("PNC") filed its memorandum in opposition on March 29, 2019, and Plaintiffs filed their reply on April 5, 2019.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-02-07 · Published · cited 28× · 853 F.3d 390; 2017 WL 490410; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2150
*395 SMITH, Circuit Judge. Ninety-two plaintiffs 1 filed suit against PNC Bank, N.A. (PNC), alleging, among other things, (1) violations of Missouri’s Uniform Fiduciaries Law (UFL); (2) aiding and abetting the breach of fiduciary duties; (3) cons
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017-06-12 · Published · cited 116× · 859 F.3d 295; 2017 WL 2507729
DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Two years after the bankruptcy court canceled Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (‘Wells Fargo”) deed of trust covering a piece of real property, and several months after the property was sold in foreclosure to a bona fide purchaser for value, Wells Fargo moved to set aside the bankruptcy court’s order. The bankruptcy court denied Wells Fargo’s motion, and the distr
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 7303
PNC Bank, NA v Islam (2019 NY Slip Op 07303) PNC Bank, NA v Islam 2019 NY Slip Op 07303 Decided on October 9, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-10-28 · Published · cited 7× · 131 N.Y.S.3d 570; 187 A.D.3d 1230; 2020 NY Slip Op 06161
PNC Bank, N.A. v Ramdass (2020 NY Slip Op 06161) PNC Bank, N.A. v Ramdass 2020 NY Slip Op 06161 Decided on October 28, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-08-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 NY Slip Op 04930
Windward Bora, LLC v PNC Bank, N.A. (2022 NY Slip Op 04930) Windward Bora, LLC v PNC Bank, N.A. 2022 NY Slip Op 04930 Decided on August 10, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-07-31 · Published · cited 8× · 170 So. 3d 932; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11571; 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1813
EDWARDS, J. Appellants/borrowers, Margaret and James Martins (“Martins”), appeal from the final summary judgments entered in this mortgage foreclosure case against them and in favor of Appellee, PNC Bank, NA as Successor by Merger to National City Bank, as Successor by Merger to National City Bank of Indiana (“PNC Bank”). The Martins assert that summary judgment should not have been entered as there were disputed issues of m
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-06-03 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 Pa. Super. 130
J-A24018-19 2020 PA Super 130 TRUST UNDER WILL OF AUGUSTUS : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF T. ASHTON, DECEASED DATED : PENNSYLVANIA JANUARY 20, 1950 : : : APPEAL OF: PNC BANK, N.A. : : :
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-06-03 · Published · cited 0× · 233 A.3d 869; 2020 Pa. Super. 130
J-A24018-19 2020 PA Super 130 TRUST UNDER WILL OF AUGUSTUS : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF T. ASHTON, DECEASED DATED : PENNSYLVANIA JANUARY 20, 1950 : : : APPEAL OF: PNC BANK, N.A. : : : : No
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-08-23 · Published · cited 2× · 219 A.D.3d 800; 195 N.Y.S.3d 265; 2023 NY Slip Op 04362
Dekalb Assets 2015, LLC v Roman (2023 NY Slip Op 04362) Dekalb Assets 2015, LLC v Roman 2023 NY Slip Op 04362 Decided on August 23, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judi
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015-04-06 · Published · cited 22× · 527 B.R. 844
OPINION AND ORDER ENRIQUE S. LAMOUTTE, Bankruptcy Judge This adversary proceeding is before the court upon the Motion Requesting Partial Summary Judgment (the “Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Docket No. 15) filed by Daniel Román Pérez and Cyn*848thia González Arroyo (the “Plaintiffs” or the “Debtors”) alleging that
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003-09-17 · Published · cited 13× · 831 A.2d 1269; 2003 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 678
OPINION BY Judge LEADBETTER. In this appeal we are called upon to address the issue left open by our Supreme Court in Staudenmayer v. Staudenmayer, 552 Pa. 253, 714 A.2d 1016 (1998), to wit: the continued viability of the doctrine of common law marriage. PNC Corporation (PNC), employer of decedent, Janet Stamos, appeals the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), affirming the gra
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009-06-02 · Published · cited 45× · 970 A.2d 656; 292 Conn. 1; 2009 Conn. LEXIS 120
Opinion KATZ, J. This case returns to this court for the second time, having been remanded to the trial court following our decision in Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 276 Conn. 168, 884 A.2d 981 (2005). The named defendant, the Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation (diocese), and certain individual
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-09-25 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 NY Slip Op 04588
U.S. Bank N.A. v Medina (2024 NY Slip Op 04588) U.S. Bank N.A. v Medina 2024 NY Slip Op 04588 Decided on September 25, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-09-02 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 NY Slip Op 04890
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Bedell (2020 NY Slip Op 04890) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Bedell 2020 NY Slip Op 04890 Decided on September 2, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-05-13 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 NY Slip Op 2763
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Abrahim (2020 NY Slip Op 02763) Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Abrahim 2020 NY Slip Op 02763 Decided on May 13, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-07-08 · Published · cited 13× · 130 A.D.3d 700; 14 N.Y.S.3d 66
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated October 18, 2012, which denied that branch of its unopposed motion which was for an order of reference and, in effect, denied those branches of the motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint, to strike the answers of the defendants Victor E. Prince and Bridget Claxton, and f
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 2320
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Eliyahu (2019 NY Slip Op 02320) HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Eliyahu 2019 NY Slip Op 02320 Decided on March 27, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-05-24 · Published · cited 1× · 858 F.3d 488; 2017 WL 2259630; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 9075
*492 SMITH, Circuit Judge. This case continues to chronicle the legal consequences flowing from Martin Sigillito’s Ponzi scheme known as the British Lending Program (BLP). See, e.g., Aguilar v. PNC Bank, N.A., 853 F.3d 390 (8th Cir. 2017); United States v. Sigillito,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-06-10 · Published · cited 3× · 129 A.D.3d 816; 11 N.Y.S.3d 230
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for a violation of General Business Law § 349 and fraud, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Strauss, J.), dated May 9, 2012, as granted those branches of the motion of the defendants American Express Bank, FSB, and American Express Travel Related Services, Inc., which were for summary judgment di