Cases

TURGEON, J., On January 6, 1996, the plaintiffs filed a complaint against the defendants in the above-captioned consolidated action, seeking various damages as a result of, inter alia, defendant Peregrin having a romantic and sexual relationship with plaintiff Aileen Nardella while providing her with counseling following the death of her mother. Defendant Peregrin was formerly a priest with the Good Shepherd Church of Ca

ROWLEY, President Judge: These consolidated appeals have been filed by three congregations of Roman Catholic churches whose parishes have been suppressed by appellee1 The Most Rever*1152end Donald W. Wuerl, Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh: at No. 122 Pittsburgh 1995 — the Croatian Roman Catholic Congregation of the Ho

547 Pa. 277 (1997) 690 A.2d 195 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. David G. STEWART, Jr. Appeal of the ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ALLENTOWN, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 23, 1996. Decided February 24, 1997. *280 Philip J. Murren, Harrisburg, Maura K. Quinlan, Harrisbu

JUSTICE STEWART delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Justice Welch concurred in the judgment and opinion. Justice Spomer dissented, with opinion. OPINION On October 24, 2002, the plaintiff, James Wisniewski, filed a complaint against the defendant, the Catholi

2024 WI 13 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP2007 COMPLETE TITLE: Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc., Barron County Developmental Services, Inc., Diversified Services, Inc., Black River Industries, Inc. and Headwaters, Inc., Petitione

436 Pa. Superior Ct. 262 (1994) 647 A.2d 597 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. David G. STEWART, Jr. Appeal of the ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ALLENTOWN. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 15, 1994. Decided August 2, 1994. *264 Maura K. Quinlan, Harrisburg, for appellant. Michael Dennehy,

[J-40-2018] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. IN RE: FORTIETH STATEWIDE : No. 45 WM 2017 INVESTIGATING GRAND JURY : : Appeal from the Order of the : Supervising Judge of the Fortieth

OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON. This case deals with the cost containment provisions for care of injured workers, as applied in the exceptional instance of trauma care, when urgency limits a provider's ability to contain costs. There is a specific statutory provision which deals with this issue, Section 306(f.1)(10) of the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act (Act).

140 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 428 (1991) 593 A.2d 28 BISHOP LEONARD REGIONAL CATHOLIC SCHOOL, Petitioner, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 13, 1991. Decided June 12, 1991. Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied November 12, 1991.

354 F.Supp.2d 573 (2004) Kimberly Ann GAINES, an individual, and William Samuel Gaines, individually and in his capacity as Personal Representative for the Estate of William Robert Gaines, Plaintiffs, v. Reverend Henry R. KRAWCZYK, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, St. Maximilian Kolbe Parish, St. Anne Catholic Church, Our Lady of Joy Parish and John Doe Nos. 1-10, Defendants.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 579 OPINION The single issue presented in the instant case is whether the civil courts of this Commonwealth have subject-matter jurisdiction over a tort suit alleging defamation and negligent infliction of emotional distress arising out of a parochial school's expulsio

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF No. 24-7246 YAKIMA WASHINGTON, D.C. No. 1:23-cv-03027- Plaintiff - Appellee, MKD v. OPINION NICK BROWN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Washington State; ANDRETA

761 F.Supp.2d 766 (2010) NORTHFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF WAUKEGAN et al., Defendants. No. 09 C 7402. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 27, 2010. *767 Michael John Duffy, Jeffrey Mark Alperin, Shevonn Katherine Willis, Tressle

746 A.2d 626 (2000) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellants, v. Gerald S. TAYLOR, Appellee. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 1, 1999. Filed February 1, 2000. *627 Calvin R. Koons, Deputy Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, for appellants. Richard Wile, Pittsburgh, for appellee. Elle

OPINION BY JUDGE SIMPSON This case involves an issue of first impression, whether a Catholic college’s expulsion decision is reviewable by the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (Commission). A former African-American student, Allan-Michael Meads (Student) filed a complaint with the Commission, alleging Chestnut Hill College (College) expelled him base

MEMORANDUM SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge. Before the court are two motions to dismiss, one filed by Defendant Lincoln *428Intermediate Unit (“LIU”) (Doc. 18) and one filed jointly by The Paradise Protectory and Agricultural School, Inc.; Paradise School for Boys; Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Inc.; and

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 21-1830 _______________ EUGENE MICHAEL FREIN; DEBORAH FREIN, Appellants v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE; PIKE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; RAYMOND TONKIN; JOHN/JANE DOE I–V ____

739 F.Supp. 1003 (1990) Susan Long LITTLE, Plaintiff, v. ST. MARY MAGDALENE PARISH, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 89-1152. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. May 23, 1990. *1004 Jay N. Silberblatt, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff. Joni Mangino, Pittsburgh, Pa., Philip Murren and Maura Quinlan, Harrisburg, Pa., Linda

OPINION OF THE COURT STAPLETON, Circuit Judge: Susan Long Little, a Protestant teacher, claims that St. Mary Magdalene Parish (“the Parish”), operator of a Roman Catholic school, violated Title VII’s prohibition against religious discrimination when it failed to renew her contract because of her remarriage. We find this claim to be without merit and will affirm the district court’s judgment. 739 F.Supp. 1

FRIEDMAN, Judge. Dorothy A. Verdecchia, Lillie D. Bernabe, Lorraine Petronelis and Florence M. Peterson (collectively, Claimants) appeal from various orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming the referees’ decisions to deny Claimants unemployment compensation benefits under section 4(i)(4)(8) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex.Sess., P.L. (1937) 28