Cases

274 F.3d 148 (4th Cir. 2001) DANIEL ADAMS; ROBERT C. ADKISSON; THOMAS W. ADLER; MATTHEW ALBRIGHT; KANYIA J. ANDERSON; BRADLEY D. ANTONS; LONNIE E. ARTIS; JAMES S. BAILIE; JOHN BANKS; JAMES R. BARKER; KAREN MARIE BARNES; CHARLENE A. BEAHM; JAMES T. BLOUNT; WILLIAM BRADY; LARRY D. BRENEMAN; FREDERICK M. BROCCOLO; MICHAEL B. CARDEN; WILLIAM R. CARMAN; WILLIAM H. CARROLL; MARC W. CHADWICK; DAVID CHERESKIN; ROBERT E. CHERRY; RICHARD CHILDRESS; MARK COLE

JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. | aThe defendant, Andrei Johnson, has appealed the sentences imposed for his convictions of three counts of first degree robbery in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:64.1. After being found guilty by a 12-person jury, the trial judge sentenced the defendant to 30 years imprisonment on each count, with the sentences on counts two and three to run consecutively, resulting in a total sentence of 60 years. For t

OPINION By the Court, Hardesty, J.: In this petition for extraordinary writ relief, we must determine whether the district court may appoint an unwilling director trustee of a dissolved corporation for the purpose of defending actions against the corporation that arose post-dissolution and after completion of the winding-up process. To resolve this issue, we must construe Nevada’s corporat

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM JENNINGS CHOYCE, Defendant and Appellant. S169090 San Joaquin County Superior Court SF98079A July 21, 2025 Justice Evans authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero and Justic

[Cite as State ex rel. Pleasant v. Indus. Comm., 2017-Ohio-7130.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. Keith Pleasant, : Relator, : v. : No. 15AP-637 Industrial Commission of Ohio : (REGULAR CALENDAR) and City of Col

324 F.Supp.2d 242 (2004) Jason JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. Martin FOURNIER, et al., Defendant No. CIV.03-178-P-S. United States District Court, D. Maine. July 2, 2004. *243 Kelly A. McMorran, Thomas P. Peters II & Associates, P.A., Lewiston, ME, for Jason Jordan, Plaintiff. Michael J. Schmidt, Wheeler & Arey, P.A., Water

Filed: January 31, 2002 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Nos. 00-2269(L) (CA-99-1851) Daniel Adams, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, versus City of Norfolk, Virginia, Defendant - Appellant.

2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF SETTLEMENT ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: I conducted a hearing on December 22, 2010, to consider and regulate two issues necessary to be resolved to consummate the Affirmation of Final Settlement as provided by § XXII of the Settlement Process Agreement, As Amended (“SPA”): (1) the report by the Special Counsel

805 A.2d 372 (2002) 370 Md. 447 Sriyani MUTHUKUMARANA, Individually, etc, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Maryland, et al. Sarah Fried, et al., v. Kim Archer, et al. Nos. 83, 84, Sept. Term, 2001. Court of Appeals of Maryland. August 26, 2002. *377 Daniel A. Brown (Brown & Gould, LLP, on brief), Beth

344 F.Supp.2d 686 (2003) In re: PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE (PPA) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, Alvis v. Glaxosmithkline, et al., Nos. C01-2186, MDL NO. 1407. United States District Court, W.D. Washington at Seattle. January 13, 2003. *687 Antriss Edward, Thomas Jason Taylor, LaDonna Curto, Jo Hill, Rezso Horvath, Marta Kuehne, Anne

762 F.Supp.2d 631 (2010) In re WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER SITE LITIGATION. In re Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. In re Combined World Trade Center and Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. Nos. 21 MC 100(AKH), 21 MC 102, 21 MC 103. United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 30, 2010. *632 Marion Sandra M

756 So.2d 1160 (2000) STATE of Louisiana v. Eric LAYMON and Eric Rogers. No. 97-KA-1520. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. March 15, 2000. Rehearing Denied March 31, 2000. *1164 Yvonne Chalker, Louisiana Appellate Project, New Orleans, Louisiana, Counsel for Defendant-Appellant, Eric Laymon. Jo

272 F.Supp.2d 1112 (2003) Linda AKEE et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-382BMK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. July 21, 2003. *1113 *1114 *1115 *1116

The opinion of the Court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J. Defendant, John Martini, kidnapped Irving Flax, a Fair Lawn businessman, and held him for $25,000 ransom. After receiving *15the ransom money, defendant killed Flax by shooting him three times in the back of the head at extremely close range. A jury convicted defendant of purposeful or knowing murd

OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti

APPOINTMENT OF PRETRIAL JUDGE IN THE FOLLOWING MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CASE: Pursuant to Administrative Rule 13, the cases listed on Appendix A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, and tag-along cases if any, are transferred to Judge Tracy Christopher of the 295th District Court of Harris County. Justice CASTILLO not sitting. APPENDIX A Amended Appendix A, Part I and

PROST, Circuit Judge. This is a military pay class action case brought on behalf of officers of the United States Air Force terminated pursuant to a 1993 Reduction in Force (“RIF”). The basis of their complaint is that the formal instructions governing selection for involuntary termination required different treatment of officers based on their race or gender, thereby violating the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amen

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,