Cases

306 F.Supp.2d 756 (2004) Donald ROHAN, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 03 C 3029. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 24, 2004. *757 *758 Frederick J. Daley, Jr., Daley, Debofsky & Bryant, Chicago, IL, C

46 P.3d 753 (2002) 2002 UT App 109 Joseph W. ROHAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Chad BOSEMAN, a minor; and Jerald Boseman, an individual, Defendants and Appellees. No. 20001148-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. April 11, 2002. Rehearing Denied May 6, 2002. *754 Joseph W. Rohan, Halliday &

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER concurred. Judge SHEDD wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Tess Rohan appeals the April 17, 2003 judgment of the District Court for the District of Maryland (J. Frederick Motz, Judge) granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee Networks Presentations LLC

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: In March 1994 appellant Rohan White was arrested and charged with two counts of possessing with intent to distribute both cocaine base (crack) and cocaine hydrochloride (cocaine) in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1). He faced a mandatory minimum se

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated January 14, 1988, which granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to dismiss the complaint. Ordered that the order is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Rockland County, with direction to refer the case to the Workers’ Com

OPINION OF THE COURT John L. Bell, J. On September 27,1990, claimant and his spouse were returning to the United States from a trip to Montreal, Canada. They were stopped by a Federal customs inspector at the Champlain Port of Entry, located on Interstate 87 in the Town of Champlain, Clinton County. Claimant was instructed to a secondary inspection area, where he exited his vehicle and was asked a series

This is a suit for damages for personal injuries sustained when appellee was forced to drive his vehicle off the highway in order to avoid a collision with appellant's vehicle. The jury found primary negligence, contributory negligence, and damages. The trial court sustained appellee's motion to disregard the contributory negligence issues, and entered judgment on the verdict. The judgment is reversed. The accident occurred on September 3, 1968, about 6:00 a.m. at the intersect

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), dated August 23, 2016, which, after a hearing on that branch of the omnibus motion of the defendant Anthony Morris which was to suppress physical evidence and pursuant to a stipulation in lieu of motions of the defendant Rohan Golding, granted suppression of physical evidence. Ordered that the order is affi

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 420 OPINION The focal point of this appeal is the proper role of the prosecuting attorney in grand jury proceedings.1 More specifically, we are asked to adopt a rule requiring prosecutors to present substantially exculpatory ev

OPINION OF THE COURT Kapnick, J. This proceeding arises from the mother’s petition to relocate with the parties’ child to Florida, which Family Court denied after a hearing. “It is well established that in reviewing relocation and other custody issues, deference is to be accorded to the determination rendered by the factfinder, unle

635 S.E.2d 237 (2006) KIMBRELL v. The STATE. No. A06A0976. Court of Appeals of Georgia. August 1, 2006. *238 Inez Grant, Gillsville, for Appellant. Larry Baldwin II, Solicitor-General, Michelle Rohan, Assistant Solicitor-General, for Appellee. MILLER, Judge. Bobby Lee Kimbrell was convicted at a bench trial o

599 S.E.2d 329 (2004) 267 Ga.App. 381 The STATE v. HARDEN. No. A04A0674. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 12, 2004. *330 Jerry Rylee, Solicitor-General, Michelle T. Rohan, Assistant Solicitor-General, Gainesville, for appellant. Hulsey, Oliver & Mahar, Jason A. Dean, Gainesville, for appellee.</

597 F.3d 311 (2010) MARATHON E.G. HOLDING LIMITED and Marathon E.G. Production Limited, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CMS ENTERPRISES COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-20034. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 10, 2010. *312 Edgar Ross Norwood (argued), The Norwood Law Firm, Liberty, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellan

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 720 {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Robert Pinchot, appeals the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court's grant of summary judgment for defendant-appellee, Mahoning County Sheriff's Department. The issue in this appeal is whether Pinchot established a prima facie case of disability discrimination. Specific

DECISION Before this Court is a motion to dismiss an indictment pursuant to Rule 12 of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rohan Russell (hereinafter "Russell") and Fode Sidibe (hereinafter "Sidibe") or ("Defendants") seek to dismiss the January 18, 2002 grand jury indictment charging them with first degree sexual assault and conspiracy to commit first degree sexual assault. The Defendants base this motion

274 P.3d 740 (2012) 2012 MT 68 364 Mont. 347 Kevin KICHNET, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BUTTE-SILVER BOW COUNTY and State of Montana, acting through the office of the State Medical Examiner, Department of Justice, Defendants and Appellees. No. DA 11-0445. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs January 25, 2012.

Justice MARTIN dissenting. The majority decision relieves respondents of the statutory duty to contribute pro rata toward the expenses for renovating their condominium common areas. This decision contravenes the legislative purpose behind the enactment of N.C.G.S. § 47A-12, which requires all unit owners to pay their pro rata share of common expenses. This outcome-determinative provision states succinctly: “[U]n

SUMMARY ORDER Yan Min Han, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a September 5, 2006 order of the BIA affirming the March 16, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Patricia A. Rohan denying Han’s motion to reopen her immigration proceedings. In re Yan Min Han, No. A79 316 952 (BIA Sept. 5, 2006), aff'g No. A79 316 952 (Immig. Ct. N.Y. City Mar. 16, 2006). We assume the parties’ f

381 F.3d 1298 George A. WILLIAMS, Michael A. Perryman, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.CONSOLIDATED CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, Rayfield Alfred, Fire Chief, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellants. No. 02-14191. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. August 27, 2004. Ernst D. Mueller,

67 Wn. App. 766 (1992) 840 P.2d 198 PETER M. FORD, ET AL, Appellants, v. RED LION INNS, Respondent. No. 27388-4-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. August 10, 1992. Gordon Tobin, for appellants. Michael Goldfarb and Rohan, Goldfarb & Shapiro, for respondent. GROSSE, C.J. Peter M.