Cases

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13535 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY vs. MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. (and

958 F.Supp. 1151 (1997) Mr. and Mrs. Barry PICK v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. Civil Action No. 94-1729. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. February 27, 1997. *1152 *1153 *1154 Harry Hoskins, Frank B. Hayne, New Orleans, LA, Frank Sdoan, Covin

511 F.Supp.2d 418 (2007) DIGENE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and Beckman Coulter, Inc., Defendants. C.A. No. 01-752-MPT. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 24, 2007. *419 Richard L. Horwitz, David Ellis Moore, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE, Christine A. Dudzik, David

484 F.Supp.2d 274 (2007) DIGENE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., and Beckman Coulter, Inc., Defendants. C.A. No. 01-752-MPT. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 9, 2007. *275 *276 Richard L. Horwitz, David Ellis Moore, Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wil

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 604 U. S. Part 2 Pages 593–649 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT April 2, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

ROGERS, C.J. The primary issue raised by this appeal and cross appeal is the range of monetary remedies available to an employer once it has proven that its employee breached his common-law duty of loyalty. The plaintiff, Wall Systems, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding it damages of $43,200, plus statutory interest and attorney's fees, after concluding that the

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judge ERVIN and Judge TRAXLER joined. OPINION LUTTIG, Circuit Judge: Jeannette and Edwin Wade appeal the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment against them in this diversity action on the ground that the statute of limitations on their action wa

28 F.Supp.2d 401 (1998) Jason LEIGH, Plaintiff, v. DANEK MEDICAL, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 4:95-CV-797-A. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. June 25, 1998. *402 Michael Ray McGown, Weller Wheelus & Green, Beaumont, TX, John J. Cummings, III, Donna S. Cummings, Frank C. Dudenhefer, Jr., Cumming

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER MeBRYDE, District Judge. Came on for consideration the motion of defendants American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (“AAOS”) and the Scoliosis Research Society (“SRS”) (collectively the “medical associations”) for summary judgment. The court, having considered the motion, the response of plaintiffs, David Conger, Ronald Gene Penny (“Penny”), and Teresa R. Penny, th

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motions for summary judgment and dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction. This case is one of more than two thousand separate products liability actions filed by more than five thousand plaintiffs claiming that defective “pedicle screw fixation devices” which have been surgically attac

316 F.Supp.2d 174 (2004) DIGENE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and Beckman Coulter Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A.01-752 KAJ. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 7, 2004. *175 Richard D. Kirk, Esq., Morris James Hitchens & Williams LLP, Wilmington, DE, for plaintiff Digene Corporation. Of Cou

172 F.Supp.2d 203 (2001) Roger W. MEHLE, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. No. 01-1544 (JR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 30, 2001. *204 Francis Joseph Warin, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr., John G. Keste

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JON D. LEVY, District Judge. The United States Magistrate Judge filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 124) with the court on April 1, 2014, pursu*449ant to 28 U.S.C. § 686(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The defendant filed Objections to the Recommended Decision

OPINION NICKELL, JUDGE: The question before us is whether University Medical Center, Inc. (“UMC”)1— *792operator of University of Louisville Hospital and related facilities (“ULH”) — is a public agency within the scope of Kentucky’s Open Records Act (“Act”).2 Two paths have been s

43 A.3d 111 (2012) 304 Conn. 585 G. Berry SCHUMANN v. DIANON SYSTEMS, INC. No. 18655. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued May 18, 2011. Decided May 1, 2012. *114 Gregory A. Castanias, pro hac vice, with whom were Leon F. DeJulius, Jr., pro hac vice, Daniel A. Schwartz, Hartford, and, on t

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR NOTICE TO POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS AND CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION And ORDER APPROVING IN PART AND STRIKING IN PART PROPOSED FORM OF NOTICE AND PROPOSED CONSENT FORM William P. Johnson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before this Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Notice to Potential Plaintiffs and Conditional Certification, filed May

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is a shareholder securities class action brought against Quality Systems, Inc. (“QSI”) and its high-ranking directors and officers, Sheldon Razin, Steven Plo-chocki, and Paul Holt (collectively, “Defendants”). The claims are asserted on behalf of all persons or entitie

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 8, 2022 Decided July 18, 2023 No. 22-7033 ISAAC HARRIS, ET AL., APPELLEES v. MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, INC., APPELLANT v. STAR TRANSPORTATION LLC, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from th

ORDER LANDYA McCAFFERTY, United States Magistrate Judge. Greg Hubbard, a former employee of Tyco Integrated Cable Systems, Inc. (“Tyco”) who was born and raised in England, is suing Tyco in five counts. He asserts: (1) two claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; and (2) three claims under New Hampshire’s Law Against Discrimination, N.H.Rev.Sta