⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Roger Lee French French, Susan Ann”

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2020-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed December 31, 2020 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-18-00050-CV __________ SUSAN DAVIS VAN DYKE ET AL., Appellants V. THE NAVIGATOR GROUP ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 118th District Court Martin
Hawaii Supreme Court · 2025-09-22 · Published · cited 0×
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 22-SEP-2025 02:29 PM
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2026-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed February 27, 2026 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-24-00007-CV __________ THE NAVIGATOR GROUP ET AL., Appellants V. SUSAN DAVIS VAN DYKE ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 118th District Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2001-11-01 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00196-CV Hellen Reasoner Hutchison, Milburn E. Nutt, and Susan McRae, Appellants v. Union Pacific Resources Company, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY, 155TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 96V-197, HONORABLE FRED A. MOORE, JUDGE PRESIDING Hellen Reasoner Hutchiso
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2001-11-01 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00196-CV Hellen Reasoner Hutchison, Milburn E. Nutt, and Susan McRae, Appellants v. Union P
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
Hill v. Taylorpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005-11-15 · Published · cited 2× · 621 S.E.2d 284; 174 N.C. App. 415; 2005 N.C. App. LEXIS 2474
621 S.E.2d 284 (2005) Suzanne HILL, Ford Goudey, Mary Susan Schmidt, C.H. Ballou, Dora Dean Ballou, A.C. Blankenship Steve A. Brock, Jean Burrows, Carolyn B. Byrd, D.S. Byrd, Joseph Canosa, J.L. Castleberry, Margie R. Castleberry, Albert Chappell, Jean Chappell, Lewis Clarke, Brenda Davis, J. Chris Davis, Josephine Davis, Jim French, Anne B. Gilliam, James Gilliam, *285 Ann J. Gold, W.A. Gold, Emily Graham, Luke Grube
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981-07-08 · Published · cited 67× · 661 F.2d 1243; 213 U.S. App. D.C. 67; 8 Fed. R. Serv. 1155; 32 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1; 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11662
MacKINNON, Circuit Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part). The Black Panther Party and its co-plaintiffs seek $100 million in compensatory and punitive damages from a number of former and present United States officials and employees who, beginning in 1967, allegedly participated in a covert action program (code named COINTELPRO) designed to destr
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013-02-25 · Published · cited 25× · 397 S.W.3d 552; 2013 WL 658078; 2013 Tenn. LEXIS 212
OPINION SHARON G. LEE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, and WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JJ„ joined. The issue presented is whether the jury verdict' against the management company of an assisted living facility for negligence based on u
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2017-12-15 · Published · cited 41× · 177 A.3d 47
STRINE, Chief Justice, dissenting: With regret, I respectfully dissent from the well-stated decision of my colleagues, which affirms a thoughtful'decision of the Court of Chancery. I do so because I find that the facts pled raise a pleading, stage inference that it was the business strategy of Duke Energy, accepted and supported by its board of directors, to run the company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001-05-04 · Published · cited 60× · 248 F.3d 1214; 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2275; 56 Fed. R. Serv. 1361; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 8160; 2001 WL 477224
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge This appeal arises from a well-publicized decision by the Oklahoma City Police Department (OCPD) to remove the Academy Award-winning film The Tin Drum from public access after a state judge opined in an ex parte hearing that the movie contained child pornography in violation of Oklahoma law. Michael Camfield, whose rented copy of the
Washington Supreme Court · 2020-10-15 · Published · cited 0×
FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON IN CLERK’S OFFICE OCTOBER 15, 2020 SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON OCTOBER 15, 2020 SUSAN L. CARLSON SUPREME COURT CLERK IN THE
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008-01-24 · Published · cited 7× · 380 B.R. 753; 59 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 252; 43 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2190; 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 146; 2008 WL 215161
380 B.R. 753 (2008) In re Tracey R. HUNTER, Debtor. Susan L. Rhiel, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Ohio Health Corporation, Defendant. In re Brigitte Ann Strange, Debtor. Susan L. Rhiel, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. OhioHealth Corporation, Defendant. In re Alean M. Bell, Debtor. Frederick L. Ransier, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Plan Administrator, OhioHealth Retirement 403(b) Savings Plan, Defendant. In re Kevin Douglas Longn
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001-08-21 · Published · cited 21× · 262 F.3d 222; 7 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 339; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18785
262 F.3d 222 (3rd Cir. 2001) WILLIAM TURNER; YVONNE RUFFIN; JAMES OECHSLE; GLADYS WOODARD; GEORGE AALBREGTSE; CALVIN AKERS; ROBERT ALBRIGHT; BARRY AMOS; KEVIN ANDERSON; ELLIOTT BAILEY; TYRONE BANKS; WILLIAM BAUER; WILSON BECKWITH, JR.; VITO BENDZIUS; DEBORAH BLACKMAN; GLENDA BLAKE; LORETTA BLAKE; BERTRAND BLIER, SR.; JOSEPH BLOCKER; MARY BONETT; JAMES BOSTON; CHARLES BOTTOMS; CAROLYN BOYCE; FABIAN BRINSON; VICTOR BROWN; WILLIAM BRYANT; RALPH BURTON
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017-08-18 · Published · cited 74× · 868 F.3d 438; 2017 FED App. 0186P; 2017 WL 3568494; 120 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2017; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15648
OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. In 2010, Congress passed the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), a law aimed at reducing tax evasion by United States taxpayers holding funds in foreign accounts. FATCA imposes account-reporting requirements (and hefty penalties for noncompliance) on both individual taxpayers and foreign financial institutions (FFIs). F
California Supreme Court · 2004-12-06 · Published · cited 302× · 101 P.3d 509; 21 Cal. Rptr. 3d 612; 34 Cal. 4th 614; 2004 Daily Journal DAR 14410; 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10643; 2004 Cal. LEXIS 11655
21 Cal.Rptr.3d 612 (2004) 34 Cal.4th 614 101 P.3d 509 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Rodney Jesse SAN NICOLAS, Defendant and Appellant. No. S028747. Supreme Court of California. December 6, 2004. Rehearing Denied January 19, 2005. Certiorari Denied October 3, 2005.
Hill v. Taylorpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006-03-02 · Published · cited 0× · 629 S.E.2d 852
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of December 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2023-09-07 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012-04-20 · Published · cited 133× · 818 N.W.2d 1; 2012 WL 1366597; 2012 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 40
APPEL, Justice (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. I concur with Justice Wiggins’s opinion. In light of the virtually unprecedented determination of Justice Mansfield’s opinion to reach out to uphold the district court on grounds other than those decided by the district court and that the parties chose not to present on appeal, I proceed to state *5