Cases

Millett, Circuit Judge: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq ., creates a powerful statutory presumption in favor of maintaining the current classroom placement of a student with a disability when the schoo

Brown, J. ¶1 Richard and Mary Lou McClammy appeal the Klickitat County Superior Court order granting summary judgment dismissal of their fire-loss suit against *771State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and their agent, Michael Cole (Mr. Cole). The McClammys contend the trial court erred in ruling the record failed to establish a special relationship existed with Mr. Cole t

985 A.2d 356 (2009) 118 Conn.App. 683 Roger L. SIMON et al. v. Harold E. COLE. No. 30354. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued October 29, 2009. Decided December 29, 2009. *357 Andrew W. Skolnick, with whom, on the brief, was Catherine A. Cuggino, Milford, for the appellant (defendant).<

939 A.2d 750 (2007) In the Matter of Virginia COLE and Roger L. Ford. No. 2007-190. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Submitted: November 13, 2007. Opinion Issued: December 20, 2007. *751 The Coolidge Law Firm, PLLC, of Dover (Linda J. Mayrand, on the brief), for the petitioner. Mark S. Moeller, P.A., of Dover and R

ORDER PER CURIAM. Lance Cole (hereinafter, “Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. Movant pleaded guilty to one count of committing violence against an employee of a correctional facility, Section 217.385.1 RSMo (2000). Movant was sentenced to serve ten years’ imprisonment concurrently with any sentence he was then serving. Movant subseq

Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE Introduction Plaintiff applied for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381a, 1382c, almost nine years ago, in July of 2009. (Administrative Record (R.) 613-15). She claimed that she became disabled as of April 9, 2009 (R. 613), due to rheumatoid arthritis, COPD, and migraines. (R.

May, J. This is a case of the missing link—the claim servicer’s standing to pursue negligence claims against a property appraiser, A third-party claim servicer appeals an order dismissing its amended complaint against an individual and his company for negligence- in the appraisal of the mortgaged property. It argues the trial court erred in dismissing the amended complaint with pr

255 B.R. 439 (2000) In re George M. COLE, Debtor. Leland Stanley, Plaintiff, v. George M. Cole and Enid Bone and Joint Clinic, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 91-20137-7. Adversary No. 91-2014. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Amarillo Division. November 28, 2000. *440 Roger Cox, Sanders Baker, P.C., Amarillo, TX,

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. We are called upon in this case to consider an issue of first impression in our Circuit: whether a state conviction for being a minor in possession of alcohol is “countable” under § 4A1.2(c) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“the Guidelines”) for purposes of calculating a federal defendant’s criminal history score. Th

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See, e.g., Monticello Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 743 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

898 F.Supp. 799 (1995) Clay Ray COLE and Debbie L. Cole, Plaintiffs, v. Charles E. SHARP and Gene Barrett, Defendants. No. 93-4094-RDR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 11, 1995. *800 Christopher Y. Meek, Lynch & Meek, Baxter Springs, KS, Ronald P. Pope, Eugene B. Ralston & Assoc., P.A., Topeka, KS, for pla

762 N.E.2d 485 (2001) 198 Ill.2d 233 260 Ill.Dec. 826 Diedra L. COLE-RANDAZZO et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jim RYAN, Illinois Attorney General, et al., Defendants. No. 92443. Supreme Court of Illinois. November 28, 2001. *486 Mar Lee Leahy, of Leahy Law Offices, Springfield, for plaintiff

OPINION. & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. Between 1998 and 2001, defendant General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”) had a lending relationship with two entities affiliated with Minnesota businessman Thomas Petters. In 2008, Ritchie Capital Management, LLC and the other five plaintiffs1 (collectively, “Ritchie”) also invested with Petters. In fall 20

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION DORA L. IRIZARRY, United States District Judge In the underlying first-party action, plaintiff DMJ Associates, L.L.C. (“DMJ”) brought an environmental cleanup cost recovery claim against various defendants, including Exxon Mobil Corporation (“Exxon Mobil”) and Quanta Resources Corporation (“Quanta”), under Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environme

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DORA L. IRIZARRY, Chief Judge In the underlying first-party action, plaintiff DMJ Associates, L.L.C. (“DMJ”) brought an environmental cleanup cost recovery claim against various defendants, including Exxon Mobil Corporation (“Exxon Mobil”) and Quanta Resources Corporation (“Quanta”), upder § 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”),

ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice. | ¡Appellants, the Arkansas Department of Human Services and its Director and his successors, and the Arkansas Child Welfare Agency Review Board and its Chairman and his successors, appeal an Order and Judgment ruling Initiated Act 1 unconstitutional as a violation of fundamental privacy rights implicit in the Arkansas Constitution. Appellee Sheila Cole and the other appellee

514 F.3d 345 (2008) LONG JOHN SILVER'S RESTAURANTS, INCORPORATED; Long John Silver's, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Erin COLE; Nick Kaufman; Victoria McWhorter, Defendants-Appellees. Secretary of Labor, Amicus Supporting Appellants. No. 06-1259. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: December 6, 2007. Decided: January 28, 2008.

Opinion MORENO, J. This case presents two issues: first, whether the “one additional hour of pay” provided for in Labor Code section 226.7 constitutes a wage or premium pay subject to a three-year statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 338) or a penalty subject to a one-year statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 340); second, whether a trial court, conducting a de novo trial, can consider additional

304 S.C. 47 (1991) 403 S.E.2d 117 The STATE, Respondent v. Roger Wayne COLE, Appellant. 23365 Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard November 13, 1990. Decided April 1, 1991. Rehearing Denied April 30, 1991. *48 Asst. Appellate Defenders Robert M. Pachak and Dani

OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a decision of the United States Tax Court holding that certain sums received by the Petitioner-Appellant, Vision Information Services, L.L.C. (“Vision” or the “taxpayer”), during tax years 1995 and 1996 were license fees and therefore taxable as ordinary income under the Internal Revenue Code