⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Roger Alan Davis and Erin Marie Davis”

District Court, M.D. Florida · 2014-06-25 · Published · cited 0× · 30 F. Supp. 3d 1353; 2014 WL 2885964; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88065
OPINION AND ORDER RAKOFF, District Judge.1 Jury deliberation is currently underway in the above-captioned case, in which plaintiff Evonne Davis sues defendants Philip Morris USA, Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company for injuries that allegedly resulted from defendants’ tortious conduct. The Court presumes familiarity with the expansive record and procedural histor
Wilson v. Davispublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008-05-28 · Published · cited 5× · 991 So. 2d 1052; 2008 WL 2201474
991 So.2d 1052 (2008) Johnna WILSON v. Ralph Calvin DAVIS and Mary Lou White Davis. No. 2007 CW 1929. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. May 28, 2008. *1054 James D. "Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Alden A. Clement, Jr., Clifton O. Bingham, Jr., Oats & Hudson, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, William
Indiana Supreme Court · 2017-10-18 · Published · cited 0× · 96 N.E.3d 554
On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2022-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 Ark. 94
Cite as 2022 Ark. 94 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 21, 2022 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2022 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PERCURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2022 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2022. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, attached
District Court, N.D. California · 2011-09-26 · Published · cited 1× · 820 F. Supp. 2d 1055; 2011 WL 4479522
820 F.Supp.2d 1055 (2011) In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Order Relates to: All Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiff Class Actions. No. M 07-1827 SI. MDL. No. 1827. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 26, 2011. *1056 Samuel W. Lanham, Jr., Lanham & Blackwell, Bangor, ME, Ian Otto, Straus & B
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010-01-08 · Published · cited 8× · 677 F. Supp. 2d 479
677 F.Supp.2d 479 (2010) In re NEURONTIN MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., and Aetna, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc., et al. MDL NO. 1629. Civil Action No. 04-cv-10981-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 8, 2010.
District Court, N.D. California · 2011-10-05 · Published · cited 2× · 822 F. Supp. 2d 953; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115212; 2011 WL 4634031
822 F.Supp.2d 953 (2011) In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Order Relates to: All Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiff Class Actions. No. M 07-1827 SI. MDL. No. 1827. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 5, 2011. Samuel W. Lanham, Jr., Lanham & Blackwell, Bangor, ME, Ian Otto, Straus & Boies LLP, Fairfax, VA, Mario Nunzio Alioto, Tru
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-29 · Published · cited 189× · 600 U.S. 181
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006-12-06 · Published · cited 2× · 467 F. Supp. 2d 579; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88497
467 F.Supp.2d 579 (2006) ENZO THERAPEUTICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO. OF THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE and Jon W. Dudas in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:06cv377. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. December 6, 2006.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007-07-30 · Published · cited 96× · 497 F.3d 1244; 78 Fed. Cl. 1244; 2007 WL 2164184
497 F.3d 1244 (2007) Frank E. ADAIR, Cynthia A. Adams, Joseph Aldridge, Emory T. Allen, Jodee B. Anderson, Alfredo Arias, Joseph W. Arnett, Lisa D. Ayres, Clyde J. Baker, Sr., Paul E. Barnard, Charles M. Bell, Anthony O. Benjamin, Roy E. Beverly, Archie S. Boatright, Jr., Terry James Boulineau, John Bradford, Mary Ann Branch, Danny L. Brantley, Jodi Britt, Yancie W. Britt, Michael E. Brown, Prentice Kerry Brown, Willie M. Brown, Donret G. Buckley, Gregor
District Court, D. Colorado · 2001-03-31 · Published · cited 6× · 152 F. Supp. 2d 1234; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9826; 2001 WL 830936
152 F.Supp.2d 1234 (2001) UNITED STATES of America and the State of Colorado, Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants, and Third-Party Defendants, v. Robert M. FRIEDLAND, Defendant, Counter-Defendant, Counter-Claimant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Aztec Minerals Corporation, an Ohio corporation; South Mountain Minerals Corporation and Gray Eagle Mining Corporation, a Colorado Corporation, Third-Party Defendants, Counter and Cross-Claimants, and Th
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
District Court, C.D. California · 2004-05-11 · Published · cited 3× · 347 F. Supp. 2d 790; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27068; 2004 WL 2792446
347 F.Supp.2d 790 (2004) In re HOMESTORE.COM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. C01-11115 MJP (CWX). United States District Court, C.D. California. May 11, 2004. *794 Bruce L. Simon, Joseph W. Cotchett, Peter E. Borkon, Robert G. Retana, Mark Cotton Molumphy, Nanci E. Nishimura, Steven N. Williams, Cotchett Pitre Simon & McCarthy, Burl
District Court, D. Nevada · 1984-08-06 · Published · cited 22× · 592 F. Supp. 1361
592 F.Supp. 1361 (1984) Raymond J. DONOVAN, Successor to Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, Plaintiff, and Southern Nevada Culinary and Bartenders Pension Trust, Involuntary Plaintiff, v. Ben SCHMOUTEY, et al., Defendants. No. CV-LV 77-47 RDF. United States District Court, D. Nevada. May 15, 1984. As Amended August 6, 1984.
Ohio Supreme Court · 1999-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 84 Ohio St. 3d 1462
ORDER This matter originated in this Court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “Commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. (A)(1)(b) and Div. (A)(2)(d). The Commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1996-1997 repor
District Court, C.D. California · 2010-12-09 · Published · cited 15× · 754 F. Supp. 2d 1208; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142663; 2010 WL 5058562
754 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2010) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNINTENDED ACCELERATION MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This document relates to: All personal liability/wrong death cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. December 9, 2010. *1211 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-07-20 · Published · cited 132× · 830 F.3d 216; 2016 WL 3923868
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge, dissenting from Part 11(A)(1): The six years of debate in the Texas Legislature before voter ID passed dera-*329onstrates that it is a controversial political question. The opinions issued today demonstrate it also raises contentious legal questions. And with respect to how to assess vote denial (as opposed to vote dilution)
Supreme Court of Florida · 2017-02-16 · Published · cited 0× · 210 So. 3d 1231; 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 179; 2017 WL 633770; 2017 Fla. LEXIS 338
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC16-181 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA EVIDENCE CODE. [February 16, 2017] PER CURIAM. We have for consideration the regular-cycle report1 of The Florida Bar’s Code and Rules of Evidence Committee (Committee), concerning legislative changes to the Florida Evidence Code and to