Cases

514 F.3d 789 (2008) Jane ROE, Appellee, v. Larry CRAWFORD, Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections; Cyndi Pruden, Acting Superintendent Women's Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Correctional Center, in her official capacity, Appellants. No. 06-3108. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 24, 2007. Filed: January 22, 2008

439 F.Supp.2d 942 (2006) Jane ROE, Plaintiff, v. Larry CRAWFORD, et al., Defendants. No. 05-4333-CV-C-DW. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Central Division. July 18, 2006. *943 Chakshu Patel, Diana Kasdan, Jennifer Nevins, Talcott Camp, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York City, James G. Felakos, Americ

396 F.Supp.2d 1041 (2005) Jane ROE, Plaintiff, v. Larry CRAWFORD, et al., Defendants. No. 05-04333-CV-C-DW. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division. October 14, 2005. *1042 Thomas Michael Blumenthal, Paule Camazine & Blumenthal, PC, James G. Felakos, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff. Michael Pritchett

C. A. 8th Cir. Application for stay, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Temporary stay entered October 14, 2005, is vacated.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-3108 ___________ Jane Roe, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

PER CURIAM:: In this case, Larry Roe, on behalf of himself and others who voted in Alabama’s November 8, 1994, general election (the “Roe Class”), claims that the State of Alabama is attempting to dilute the votes that the Roe Class cast in that election, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This dilution will occur, the Roe Class contends, if Alab

PER CURIAM: Following oral argument, we certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Alabama: WHETHER ABSENTEE BALLOTS THAT, ON THE ACCOMPANYING AFFIDAVIT ENVELOPE, FAIL TO HAVE TWO WITNESSES AND LACK PROPER NOTARIZATION (FOR EXAMPLE, BALLOT ENVELOPES THAT HAVE ONLY A SIGNATURE OR ONLY ONE WITNESS, OR ON WHICH THE VOTER AND THE NOTAR

PER CURIAM: In Alabama, a person voting by absentee ballot must execute an “affidavit” in the presence of a “‘notary public or other officer authorized to acknowledge oaths or two witnesses 18 years of age or older.’ ” Ala.Code § 17-10-7 (1980).1 Section 17-10-9 of the code prescribes the physical form of the ballot and the affidavit. The affidavit form must be printed on an envelope. A second, sma

950 S.W.2d 27 (1996) Robert ROE and Jean Roe, Individually and as next Friends for John Roe, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF MEMPHIS, INC., and St. Paul's Catholic School, Defendants-Appellees. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Jackson. December 31, 1996. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied June 2, 1997.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 21-0457 Filed July 20, 2022 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ADAM SLADE ROE, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Mark R. Fowler, Judge. Adam Roe appeals from his convictions and sentences for criminal mischief and assault. CONVICTI

651 F.Supp.2d 1065 (2009) Anthony Joseph MAJOY, Petitioner, v. Ernest ROE, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 98-6956 SVW (JWJx). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. August 4, 2009. *1066 ORDER ADOPTING SECOND SUPERSEDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN V.

[Cite as Crawford v. Tivener, 2016-Ohio-6982.] COURT OF APPEALS KNOX COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CAROLYN CRAWFORD JUDGES: Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. P

MEMORANDUM ** Gabriel Flores appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus. We affirm. We review the denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition de novo. Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, a petitioner can obtain habeas relief only if (1) the state court’s decision was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES [DOC. 30] THOMAS J. WHELAN, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs motion to strike affirmative defenses from the answer filed on behalf of Defendants Police Chief William Lansdowne, former police officer Kevin Friedman (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”), and the City of San Diego. Defenda

MEMORANDUM * Deangelo McVay appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 29, 1999, McVay was convicted of kidnaping James Miller for ransom, aggravated mayhem, and conspiracy to commit kidnaping for ransom in violation of California Penal Code §§ 182(a)(1), 205, 209(a). He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment for life without possibility of parole

Mr. Justice Stewart, concurring. In 1963, this Court, in Ferguson v. Skrupa, 372 U. S. 726, purported to sound the death knell for the doctrine of substantive due process, a doctrine under which many-state laws had in the past been held to violate the Fourteenth Amendment. As Mr. Justice Black’s opinion for the Court in Skrupa put it: “We have returned to the original constitutiona

469 F.Supp. 260 (1979) Alexander CRAWFORD v. Paul DOMINIC, William O'Neill, William Murphy, Joseph O'Neill, John Doe, Richard Roe, various unknown Individuals, and the City of Philadelphia. Civ. A. No. 76-1470. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. April 26, 1979. *261 James B. Lieber, Community Legal Services, Inc.,

OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. In 2010, Congress passed the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), a law aimed at reducing tax evasion by United States taxpayers holding funds in foreign accounts. FATCA imposes account-reporting requirements (and hefty penalties for noncompliance) on both individual taxpayers and foreign financial institutions (FFIs). F

415 F.Supp.2d 1207 (2006) Ronald G. RINER, Jr., Petitioner, v. Jackie CRAWFORD, et al., Respondents. No. 3:99-CV-0258-ECR-RAM. United States District Court, D. Nevada. February 3, 2006. *1208 Anne R. Traum, Federal Public Defender, Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner. Robert E. Wieland, Senior Deputy, Attorney General, Reno, NV,

240 S.W.3d 127 (2006) Michael R. ROE, Appellant, v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Sex Offenders Assessment Committee and Sex Offender Screening and Risk Assessment, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. No. 05-940. Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 28, 2006. *128 Pryor, Robertson & Barry, PLLC, by: Gergory T. Karber and Robert