Cases

People v Rodriquez (2020 NY Slip Op 00444) People v Rodriquez 2020 NY Slip Op 00444 Decided on January 22, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciar

[Cite as State v. Rodriquez, 2019-Ohio-3278.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 107720 v. : ANGEL RODRIQUEZ : (a.k.a. A

153 Ill. App.3d 652 (1987) 505 N.E.2d 1314 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDIBERTO RODRIQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 85-0867. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District. Opinion filed March 18, 1987. *653 *654 G. Joseph Weller and Michael

Dwyer, J. ¶1 Following a jury trial, Peter Rodriquez was convicted of assault in the second degree by strangu*926lation for choking Lori Hendon. Rodriquez’s primary contention on appeal is that insufficient evidence was adduced at trial to establish, as required by statute, that Hendon’s breathing or blood flow was “obstructed” when Rodriquez choked her. He also contends

100 Ill. App.3d 244 (1981) 426 N.E.2d 586 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PEDRO RODRIQUEZ et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 79-2001, 79-2002 cons. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (5th Division). Opinion filed September 11, 1981. *245 James J. Doherty, Public Defender

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Supreme Court Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation v. Rodriquez, 2012 IL 113706 Caption in Supreme THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL AND Court: PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Division of Professional Regulation, Appellant, v. JACK V. RODRIQUEZ, M.D., Appellee. Docket No. 113706 Filed

964 N.E.2d 112 (2011) 357 Ill. Dec. 749 Jack V. RODRIQUEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellant, v. The DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Division of Professional Regulation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-10-2775. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. December 27, 2011. *113 Stephen

30 Ill. App.3d 118 (1975) 332 N.E.2d 194 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VALENTINO RODRIQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 74-333. Illinois Appellate Court — Fifth District. July 10, 1975. Stephen P. Hurley and Michael J. Rosborough, both of State Appellate Defender's Office, of Mt. Vernon, for appellant. John C

Opinion by Mr. JUSTICE SEIDENFELD.

58 Ill. App.3d 775 (1978) 374 N.E.2d 1062 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID RODRIQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 77-442. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (4th Division). Opinion filed March 30, 1978. James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Lee McMahon and Suzanne M. Xinos, Assistant Public Defend

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Rodriquez v. Department of Financial & Professional Regulation, 2011 IL App (1st) 102775 Appellate Court JACK V. RODRIQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT Caption OF FINANCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Division of Professional Regulation, Defendant-Appellee. Distric

Opinion by JUSTICE BURKE. Not to be published in full.

SECOND DIVISION MARCH 31, 2000 No. 1-98-2524 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) APPEAL FROM THE ) CIRCUIT COURT OF Plaintiff-Appellee, ) COOK COUNTY ) ) No. 97-CR-11082 )

5 June 2000 No. 2--98--1352 _________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT _________________________________________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE ) Appeal f

Duffly, J. The defendant’s motion to withdraw her guilty plea was allowed by a Superior Court judge who had also presided over the initial plea tender more than eleven years before. At the earlier hearing the judge had advised the defendant of the consequence of deportation but failed to warn that her guilty plea additionally “may have the consequences of. . . exclusion from admission to the United States, or denial of naturaliz

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-21-00257-CR NO. 09-21-00258-CR NO. 09-21-00259-CR NO. 09-21-00260-CR NO. 09-21-00261-CR NO. 09-21-00

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted Gino Rodriquez of being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the firearm because consent to search was not voluntary. He also contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. On cross-appeal, the government maintains that the di

79 Ill. App.2d 26 (1967) 223 N.E.2d 414 People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pablo Rodriquez, Defendant-Appellant. Gen. No. 50,490. Illinois Appellate Court — First District, Third Division. January 5, 1967. *27 *28 Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender of

76 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 1021 PLUMAS COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Ame R. RODRIQUEZ, Defendant and Respondent. No. C055005. Court of Appeal of California, Third District. March 26, 2008. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 22, 2008. *2 Edmun

128 S.Ct. 1783 (2008) UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. Gino RODRIQUEZ. No. 06-1646. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 15, 2008. Decided May 19, 2008. *1786 Kannon K. Shanmugam, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Charles A. Rothfeld, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Paul D. Clement, Washing