Cases

*195OPINION OF THE COURT Levine, J. Respondent Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Social Services (DSS) contracted with a private non-profit agency to provide shelter for petitioner Elias Rodriguez, a homeless person who is permanently disabled by mental illness. As a condition of continued receipt of that housing assistance, DSS req

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the *590Department of Social Services of the State of New York, which, after a fair hearing, sustained a determination of the Westchester County Department of Social Services requiring the petitioner to pay the sum of $427 per month toward the cost of his housing, utilizing his Federal Supplemental Security Income and Social Se

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated April 5, 1996, which, after a fair hearing, affirmed a determination of the New York City Human Resources Administration, dated February 3, 1996, to discontinue the petitioner’s public assistance benefits on the ground that the petitioner, without good cause, failed to appear at a scheduled medical appointment for evaluation of her sta

PER CURIAM. Barbara A. DeBuono, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, and Brian Wing, Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services (together, the “State”), as well as the respective Departments of Social Services of the City of New York (the “City”), Nassau County (“Nassau”), Westchester County (“Westchester”), and Suffolk County (“Suffolk”) (collectively “Intervenor-Defendants” an

PER CURIAM. Barbara A. DeBuono, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, and Brian Wing, Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services (together, the “State”), as well as the respective Departments of Social Services of the City of New York (the “City”), Nassau County (“Nassau”), Westchester County (‘Westchester”), and Suffolk County (“Suffolk”) (collectively “Intervenor-Defendants” an

175 F.3d 227 Juana RODRIGUEZ, by her son and next friend, WilfredoRODRIGUEZ, Amelia Russo, Mary Weinblad, by her daughter andnext friend, Susan Downes, Cristos Gouvatsos, SidonieBennett, individually and on behalf of all others similarlysituated, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,Ruvim Aselrod, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.Barbara A. DEBUONO, Commissioner of the New York StateDepartment of Heal

162 F.3d 56 Juana RODRIGUEZ, by her son and next friend, WilfredoRODRIGUEZ, Amelia Russo, Mary Weinblad, by her daughter andnext friend, Susan Downes, Cristos Gouvatsos, SidonieBennett, individually and on behalf of all others similarlysituated, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,Ruvim Aselrod, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.Barbara A. DeBUONO, Commissioner of the New York StateDepartment of Healt

WINTER, Chief Judge: This appeal arises from a class action challenging the failure of the City of New York and other appellants (collectively “New York”) to provide certain personal-care services to Medicaid recipients. Judge Scheindlin held that New York’s failure to include safety-monitoring services along with other personal care services violated: (i) the Medicaid Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.; (ii) certain regul

AMENDED OPINION & ORDER SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. This is a class action challenging the design and implementation of task-based assessment (“TBA”) programs, used throughout New York State to determine the amount of personal care services hours provided to eligible Medicaid applicants and recipients. The individually named Plaintiffs are recipients and applicants of personal care services who

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA MARIO RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. S272129 Sixth Appellate District H049016 Santa Clara County Superior Court C1647395, C16

[Cite as Texas Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 2025-Ohio-417.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT WYANDOT COUNTY TEXAS INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO. 16-24-09 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/ CROSS-APPELLEE, v. EARL RODRIGUEZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, -And- RETAIL DIRECT, LLC DEFENDANT-APPELLEE/

404 F.3d 105 Eileen KAPPS, Geraldine Boyland, Alice Costello, Joan Ford, Joanne Karl and Margaret Riley, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Brian J. WING, as Commissioner of the Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance of the New York State Department of Family Assistance, Jason A. Turner, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services and Jerry Cammarata, as Commissi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Crim. Action No. 21-0246-1 & 2 (ABJ) DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, ) EDWARD BADALIAN, ) )

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge. Defendants appeal from the judgment of the district court (Gershon, /.) granting plaintiffs partial summary judgment, and entering an award of declaratory and in-junctive relief. The district court based its judgment on findings that, in the administration of New York’s Home Energy Assistance Program (“HEAP”), defendants violated the procedural requirements of the federal Due Process Clause, and the

OPINION OF THE COURT Sweeny, J. We are asked to determine whether the emergency shelter allowance as promulgated by 18 NYCRR 397.11 is a separate entitlement outside the definition of public assistance. For the reasons stated herein, we find that it is not. Petitioner has clinical/symptomatic HIV and resides with her husband and three children in the Bronx. She receives public assistance b

197 F.3d 611 (2nd Cir. 1999) JUANA RODRIGUEZ, by her son and next friend, Wilfredo Rodriguez; AMELIA RUSSO; MARY WEINBLAD, by her daughter and next friend, Susan Downes; CHRISTOS GOUVATSOS; and SIDONIE BENNETT, individually and on the behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,MOLLIE PECKMAN, by her son and next friend, Alex Peckman, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CITY OF NEW YORK; IRENE LAPIDEZ, Commissioner, Nassa

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2017 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

283 F.Supp.2d 866 (2003) Eileen KAPPS, Geraldine Boyland, Alice Costello, Joan Ford, Joanne Karl, and Margaret Riley, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Brian J. WING, as Commissioner of the Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance of the New York State Department of Family Assistance, Jason A. Turner, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services, and Jerry Cammarata, as Commissioner

David C. Nye, Chief U.S. District Court Judge I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants Curtis Giles, David Funk, Funk Daily, Inc., and Shoesole Farms, Inc.'s (Collectively "Defendants" or "Funk Dairy") Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 35) and Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Expert Disclosure (Dkt. 36). On January 9, 2019, the Court held oral argument and took the motions

KONENKAMP, Justice. [¶ 1.] In October 2008, plaintiff brought suit for sexual abuse committed more than forty years earlier. He averred that the abuse was perpetrated by a nun and a priest at a boarding school he attended. Defendants moved for summary judgment asserting that the limitations period had expired on plaintiffs claims because he failed to commence his action “within