Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Charles D. Wood, J. The parties’ documents were read in connection with petitioner’s requested relief to declare null and void each nomination for village office of the Village of Sleepy Hollow arising from the Democratic Party Caucus, to wit: the mayor and three trustees as reflected in the certificate of nomination signed and dated January 22, 2015, and other relief in connection th

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This petition for rehearing of an order denying a motion to dismiss an appeal merits a brief explication of a narrow issue concerning exhaustion of prison administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2000). The issue is whether justifiable circumstances may sometimes excuse a prisoner’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies when challenging c

WIGGINS, Justice. In this case, we are asked to decide whether a defendant’s right to speedy trial was violated, whether a district court judge should have recused himself, and whether the State is entitled to an independent psychiatric evaluation of a defendant when the defendant puts his mental capacity to knowingly, intelligently, or voluntarily waive his Miranda rights at issue. The court of appeals determined tha

191 F.Supp.2d 358 (2002) Osvaldo FERMIN-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Oswald Fermin, Plaintiff, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY JAIL, MEDICAL PERSONNEL (on duty 6/13/97 to 1/22/99, during 7-3 pm), United States Attorney Mary Jo White, Assistant United States Attorney David Greenwald, United States Marshals for the Southern District of New York, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. No. 00 CIV 1855 WCC. Uni

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for false arrest, malicious prosecution, and civil rights violations pursuant to 42 USC § 1983, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Santorelli, J.), dated April 8, 2015, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to amend the complaint and granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judg

SUMMARY ORDER Frank Vessa (“Vessa”) appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule *10of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and issues on appeal. We review de nov

ORDER VANESSA D. GILMORE, District Judge. In this case, Plaintiffs Edward Gonzalez, Orlando Ybarra, Patricia Gonzales, Reynaldo Guerra, Sandra Puente, Thomas Berg, and James Rodriguez (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) challenge the legality of the redistricting plan adopted by the Harris County Commissioner’s Court on August 9, 2011, known as Revised Plan A-l, which reapportions voters among Harris

PER CURIAM. Barbara A. DeBuono, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, and Brian Wing, Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services (together, the “State”), as well as the respective Departments of Social Services of the City of New York (the “City”), Nassau County (“Nassau”), Westchester County (“Westchester”), and Suffolk County (“Suffolk”) (collectively “Intervenor-Defendants” an

PER CURIAM. Barbara A. DeBuono, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, and Brian Wing, Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services (together, the “State”), as well as the respective Departments of Social Services of the City of New York (the “City”), Nassau County (“Nassau”), Westchester County (‘Westchester”), and Suffolk County (“Suffolk”) (collectively “Intervenor-Defendants” an

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HERIBERTO RODRIGUEZ; CARLOS No. 13-56292 FLORES; JUAN CARLOS SANCHEZ; ERICK NUNEZ; JUAN TRINIDAD, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 2:10-cv-06342- CBM-AJW v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Defendants, and DANIEL CRUZ; MATTHEW ONHEMUS;

*195OPINION OF THE COURT Levine, J. Respondent Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Social Services (DSS) contracted with a private non-profit agency to provide shelter for petitioner Elias Rodriguez, a homeless person who is permanently disabled by mental illness. As a condition of continued receipt of that housing assistance, DSS req

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Corrected Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 668.) This matter is fully briefed and was taken under submission without oral argument. I.JURISDICTION This Court has jurisdiction over this matter under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(3)

[Cite as State v. Rodriguez, 2025-Ohio-53.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-240075 TRIAL NO. B-2200636-A Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : OPINION AMY RODRIGU

[Cite as State v. Rodriguez, 2024-Ohio-6085.] COURT OF APPEALS PERRY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Craig R.

44 F.Supp.2d 601 (1999) Juana RODRIGUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Barbara DeBUONO, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, et al., Defendants. No. 97 CIV. 0700 SAS. United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 19, 1999. *602 *603 *604 L

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered January 30, 2007. The order, inter alia, denied that part of plaintiffs’ motion to strike the answer. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation discontinuing appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on April 21, 2008, It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present—Scudde

WINTER, Chief Judge: This appeal arises from a class action challenging the failure of the City of New York and other appellants (collectively “New York”) to provide certain personal-care services to Medicaid recipients. Judge Scheindlin held that New York’s failure to include safety-monitoring services along with other personal care services violated: (i) the Medicaid Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.; (ii) certain regul

Hector Rodriguez v. State of Maryland, No. 1530, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Getty, Joseph M., J. HEADNOTES: CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE – FOURTH AMENDMENT – WARRANTLESS SEARCHES – SEARCH INCIDENT TO ARREST – ARIZONA V. GANT Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009), allows police, without a warrant, to “search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant’s arrest only if the arrestee is within reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search or it is reasonable to believe the ve

Rodriguez v Moss (2024 NY Slip Op 00464) Rodriguez v Moss 2024 NY Slip Op 00464 Decided on February 01, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <