Cases

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 31, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-505 Lower Tribunal No. 18-21048 ________________ Janet Rodriguez, Appell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 14-cv-0191-TSC ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al., ) ) Defendan

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 22, 2015 No. 04-15-00347-CV Chris RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. U.S. Home Ownership LLC, Appellee From the 57th J

US Home Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 29, 2015 No. 04-15-00347-CV Chris RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. U

ACCEPTED 04-15-00347-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-15-00347-CV Chris RODRIGUEZ, Appellant v. US Home US HOME OWNERSHIP LLC,

c^fr-use-n/o: ~Z&/$ c/c>S // US-//"»•* o*> [plaintiff] v. ) ej^is (ZeJf/^^T- [defendant] ) IN THE O /STAc^T COURT ) /?-g.g»-i^. cx> COUNTY, TEXAS S~V JUDICIAL

36 So.3d 114 (2010) RODRIGUEZ v. US BANK, N.A. No. 5D09-2186. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. May 18, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA EVERARDO RODRIGUEZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FCA US, LLC, Defendant and Respondent. S274625 Fourth Appellate District, Division Two E073766 Riverside County Superior Court RIC1807727 October 31, 2

Filed 4/7/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO EVERARDO RODRIGUEZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, E073766 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1807727) FCA US, LLC, OPINION Defendant and Responde

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Abel Rodriguez-Rodriguez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, contemporary definition of sexual abuse of a minor does not require the age of consent to be below 17 years old and does not include an age-diffe

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Hernandez v. Mesa , 589 U.S. ----, 140 S.Ct. 735,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.