Cases

PER CURIAM. ¶ 1 Hector Rafael Rodriguez appeals a judgment convicting him of one count of second-degree sexual assault of a child under the age of sixteen. Rodriguez argues that the circuit court misused its discretion when it denied his pretrial motion to preclude the State from introducing at trial underwear worn by the victim. We affirm. ¶ 2 Rodriguez was charged with two counts of sexual assault of his girlfriend

781 N.W.2d 550 (2010) 2010 WI App 33 STATE v. RODRIGUEZ[1]. No. 2008AP2520-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. January 12, 2010. Unpublished Opinion Affirmed. NOTES [1] Petition for Review Filed.

FINE, J. ¶ 21. 0concurring). Although I agree with the Majority's decision to affirm, I would not reach the forfeiture issue because, as explained in State v. Rodriguez, 2006 WI App 163, 295 Wis. 2d 801, 722 N.W.2d 136, none of the statements were "testimonial" as that word of art is used in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). Rodriguez, 2006 WI App 163, ¶¶ 2-27, 295 Wis. 2d at 808-825, 722 N.W.2d at

738 N.W.2d 190 (2007) 2007 WI App 203 STATE v. RODRIGUEZ. No. 2005AP1207-CR. Wisconsin Court of Appeals. July 24, 2007. Unpublished opinion. Affirmed.

LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge Defendant Rebecca Rodriguez acted as the getaway driver when her boyfriend, Theodore Simmons, and another man, Robert Anderson, robbed a convenience store. During the robbery, Simmons and Anderson held store occupants at gunpoint, threatened to kill an employee, and assaulted a cashier. Charged with aiding and abetting a Hobbs Act robbery,

Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.

Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.

CURLEY, J. ¶ 42. (dissenting). In the landmark case of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), the United States Supreme Court announced that out-of-court statements by witnesses that are testimonial are barred under the Confrontation Clause unless the witnesses are unavailable and the defendants had a prior opportunity to cross-examine them, regardless of whether such statements are deemed reliable by the court. In <

724 N.W.2d 273 (2006) 2006 WI App 223 STATE v. RODRIGUEZ[1] No. 2005AP2423-CR Wisconsin Court of Appeals September 28, 2006. Affirmed. NOTES [1] Petition for Review Filed

756 N.W.2d 479 (2008) 2008 WI App 121 STATE v. RODRIGUEZ-LUIS. No. 2008AP9-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. June 3, 2008. Unpublished opinion. Affirmed.

BLANCHARD, J. ¶ 1. In 2011 Wisconsin Act 23, *719the legislature enacted statutes under which, with narrow exceptions, all persons seeking to vote must present one of several specified forms of photo identification to election officials. The League of Women Voters of Wisconsin Education Network, Inc., and its president (the League) sought a declaration in the circuit cour

740 N.W.2d 901 (2007) 2007 WI App 230 STATE v. NUNEZ-RODRIGUEZ. No. 2006AP819-CR. Wisconsin Court of Appeals. September 18, 2007. Unpublished opinion. Reversed and remanded.

Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.

WEDEMEYER, PJ. ¶ 1. Daniel Rodriguez appeals from a judgment entered after he pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance (marijuana) with intent to deliver, contrary to *739Wis. Stat. § 961.41(lm)(h)l (1999-2000).1 Rodriguez claims that the police violated his Fourth Amendment rights when they entered his mother's home without a warr

*932ORDER José Arias-Rodriguez was charged with two counts of being in the United States without authorization after removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He testified at trial that he is not Mexican citizen Arias-Rodriguez but instead is a Puerto Rican citizen named Marco Antonio Rodriguez (the name on his Illinois driver’s license). The jury disbelieved his testimony and re

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Following his removal from the United States, Alberto Rodriguez-Rodriguez returned by stealth. State police stopped him in Texas for speeding. A warrant check revealed that he was wanted in Wisconsin, where he had failed to register as a sex offender following his release from a state sentence, and he was extradited to that state. Wisconsin alerted fe

[Cite as State v. Rodriguez, 2025-Ohio-53.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-240075 TRIAL NO. B-2200636-A Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : OPINION AMY RODRIGU

221 Wis.2d 487 (1998) 585 N.W.2d 701 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Armando P. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.[†] No. 97-3097-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs May 11, 1998. Decided August 20, 1998. *489 On behalf of the defendant-appellant, th

ORDER Alberto Rodriguez pled guilty to conspiring to distribute marijuana, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to a term of 37 months’ imprisonment. He argues on appeal that the sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to respond to his argument that he should have only been sentenced to serve 8 days followed by a 4-year term of supervised release. For more than two years, R

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION NOTICE DATED AND FILED This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. December 18, 2024 A party may file with the Supreme Court a Samuel