Cases

21-2737(L) Schneiderman v. American Chemical Society In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2024 Nos. 21-2737(L), 24-274(CON) ARNOLD SCHNEIDERMAN, AKA MOSHE SCHNEIDERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

SUMMARY ORDER The plaintiff, Eric Rubin-Schneiderman, brought suit against the defendants—Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield (“Empire”), his health insurance company; Merit Behavioral Care Corporation (“Merit”), the company that performs utilization review of mental health services for Empire; and Sati Ahluwalia, an employee of Merit—under section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). H

Matter of Medina v Rodriguez (2018 NY Slip Op 00966) Matter of Medina v Rodriguez 2018 NY Slip Op 00966 Decided on February 9, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

Matter of Buggsward v Rodriguez (2018 NY Slip Op 02855) Matter of Buggsward v Rodriguez 2018 NY Slip Op 02855 Decided on April 26, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure

Matter of Sierra v Rodriguez (2018 NY Slip Op 00595) Matter of Sierra v Rodriguez 2018 NY Slip Op 00595 Decided on February 1, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau p

Matter of McMaster v Rodriguez (2018 NY Slip Op 01523) Matter of McMaster v Rodriguez 2018 NY Slip Op 01523 Decided on March 8, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

Matter of Rodriguez v Annucci (2018 NY Slip Op 00602) Matter of Rodriguez v Annucci 2018 NY Slip Op 00602 Decided on February 1, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

OPINION OF THE COURT Stein, J. This appeal is the second to have come before us challenging the denial of motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this action, which was commenced in 2005 by the Attorney General under the Martin Act (General Business Law art 23-A) and Executive Law § 63 (12) against defendants, two former officers of America

Rodriguez v State of New York (2018 NY Slip Op 01250) Rodriguez v State of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 01250 Decided on February 22, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea

Matter of Davis v Rodriguez (2015 NY Slip Op 00608) Matter of Davis v Rodriguez 2015 NY Slip Op 00608 Decided on January 22, 2015 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pur

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 43 KA 10-02443 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LORENZO RODRIGUEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (VINCENT F. GUGINO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. LORENZO RODRIGUEZ, DEFENDANT-APP

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 930 TP 14-00415 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ, PETITIONER, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT. WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1281 TP 12-01070 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, PETITIONER, V ORDER BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT. ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, PETITIONER PRO SE. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBAN

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1173 TP 12-00873 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, PETITIONER, V ORDER BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT. WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNS

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 46 TP 11-01547 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, PETITIONER, V ORDER BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT. WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (NORMAN P. EFFMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PET

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 526 TP 11-01795 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, PETITIONER, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT. WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER. ERIC T

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1094 TP 12-00754 PRESENT: FAHEY, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, PETITIONER, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT. WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR

308 F.Supp.2d 346 (2004) Eric RODRIGUEZ et al., Plaintiffs, v. George E. PATAKI et al., Defendants. Howard T. Allen et al., Plaintiffs, v. George E. Pataki et al., Defendants. No. 02 CIV. 618(RMB), 02 CIV. 3239(RMB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 15, 2004. *347 *348</

OPINION OF THE COURT Bertram R. Gelfand, S. Petitioner, by dint of being the guardian of the property of decedent’s and her nonmarital infant son, seeks letters of administration. Decedent’s mother opposes the application on the ground that since the provisions of EPTL 4-1.2 preclude the infant from inheriting from decedent in the absence of a court of competent jurisdiction having entered an order of fili

CRESTEK, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentCrestek, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Comm'rDocket No. 8285-13United States Tax Court