Cases

SUPERIOR COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. CARLOS RODRIGUEZ Docket: 2177CR00070 Dates: July 14, 2021 Present: /s/Jeffrey T. Associat

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

SALARIO, Judge. Yanery Rodriguez and Jose Hernandez appeal from a trial court order denying their motion to set" aside a default and resulting judgment for money damages in favor of Jeffrey Thompson. To the extent the order declined to set aside the default as to liability, we affirm it without comment. Because the record contains no evidence that Ms. Rodriguez and Mr. Hernandez were provided noti

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), rendered July 22, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals

PER CURIAM. Robert Rodriguez appeals a final judgment of conviction and sentence following a jury trial. The amended information charged Rodriguez with: kidnapping a child under the age of 13, with aggravated child abuse and sexual battery, in violation of section 787.01(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2013); aggravated child abuse, in violation of section 8

LAMBERT, J. Randy Rhoades petitions for a writ of certiorari, requesting that this court quash the trial court’s order that limits the trial testimony of one of his expert witnesses, *1141 Dr. Steven Rundell, a biomechanical engineer. We deny the petition. This case arise

Petition for writ of rehearing denied.

Filed 8/22/16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S223129 v. ) ) Ct.App. 6 H038588 ADAM SERGIO RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Santa Clara County

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court. The jury is a central foundation of our justice system and our democracy. Whatever its imperfections in a particular case, the jury is a necessary check on governmental power. The jury, over the centuries, has been an inspired, trusted, and effective instrument for resolving factual disputes and determining ultimate questions of guilt or innocence in criminal cases. Over the long

Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge Plaintiff Leonardo Rodriguez brings this action against the City of Chicago (the "City"), his former employer; the City's Human Resources Board (the "HRB"); the HRB's chairman, Salvador A. Cicero; a member of the HRB, Samuel L. Evans Jr.; and a hearing officer at the HRB, Roger J. Balla. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants subjected him to an unconstitutional drug test and used that tes

Opinion GROVER, J. I. Introduction We are asked once again to consider whether various probation conditions are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad without an explicit scienter element. A related claim is that an explicit constructive knowledge requirement is unconstitutional. We will conclude that the constructive knowledge element

PER CURIAM: Roderico Ramirez Rodriguez appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the doctrine of consular nonreviewability and for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rodriguez Ramirez v. Clinton,* Case

PER CURIAM. Mariangelica Quintero (“former wife”) appeals the final judgment dissolving her marriage to Jose Rodriguez (“former husband”). She first argues that the trial court erred by imputing income to her, resulting in an error in failing to award her permanent periodic alimony.1 Alternatively, she argues that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to award her at least $1 in nomi

Justice GINSBURGdelivered the opinion of the Court. In Illinois v. Caballes,543 U.S. 405, 125 S.Ct. 834, 160 L.Ed.2d

OPINION Mackey K. Hancock, Justice Appellant, Emilio Rodriguez, was convicted of robbery 1 enhanced by two prior felony convictions. 2 The jury sentenced appellant to 99 years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Depar

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Mills v. State, 23 So.3d 186, 187-88 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Hamilton v. State, 996 So.2d 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

ORDER JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge. Presently pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, [dkt. 78], which the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part for the reasons that follow. I. Standard op Review A motion for summary judgment asks that the Court find that a trial based on the uncontro

CRAIG A. GARGOTTA, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE On November 13, 2018, came on for hearing The Trustee of the Bergerud Heritage Trust's Motion to Dismiss the Original Complaint of Plaintiff Jose Rodriguez, In His Capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Steven Jeffrey Cyr (ECF No. 72) (the "BHT Trustee's Motion to Dismiss") and Le Ann Mary Cyr's Motion to Dismiss the Original Complaint of Plaintiff Jose Rodriguez, In His Cap