Cases

WILLIAMSON, J., This matter is before the court on the motions for summary judgment of Patricia Rylko, M.D. and Pocono Medical Center (PMC). The matter arises out of an alleged medical malpractice incident involving treatment of Gilbert Rodriguez, who is deceased. Patricia Rylko, M.D. was alleged to be a treating physician of Mr. Rodriguez. None of the co-defendants raised a cross-claim against Dr. Rylko, and at argumen

Galindo v Doherty (2025 NY Slip Op 00288) Galindo v Doherty 2025 NY Slip Op 00288 Decided on January 21, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

[Cite as Doherty v. Doherty, 2012-Ohio-4886.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) RALPH F. DOHERTY, II C.A. No. 11CA0067-M Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE CYNTHIA S. DOHERTY

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, againstJohn Doherty, Appellant. Gail B. Rubenfeld, for appellant. Orange County District Attorney (Robert H. Middlemiss of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of Middletown, Orange County (Robert F. Moson, J.), rendered February 21, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT PATRICK DONA-HOE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY #25) BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before this court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Patrick Donahoe, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service (“defendant”). (Docket Entry #25). Plaintiff Edward Thomas Doherty (“plaintiff’), proceeding pro se, opposes summary ju

220 B.R. 31 (1998) Clay A. WAGUESPACK, et al, v. Keith RODRIGUEZ. No. Civ.A. 97-1965. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette/Opelousas Division. January 27, 1998. *32 MEMORANDUM RULING DOHERTY, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court by way of appeal from a ruling issue

PER CURIAM. We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Respondent Brian Gerard Doherty be found guilty of professional misconduct and disbarred. Doherty has petitioned for review of the report, challenging the referee’s recommendations as to guilt, as well as the recommended sanction. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. The disciplinary case against Doherty arises from

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Jun 29 2020, 9:14 am Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the CLERK Indiana Supreme Court purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, Court

Opinion RUSHING, P. J. We address in this case the question of how much evidence a defendant must present to establish a right to summary judgment under a global release by the plaintiff of “all persons” exposed to Lability for his personal injuries. Plaintiff contends that the trial court here erred by granting summary judgment because defendant relied solely upon the language of the release. According to plai

134 Ill. App.3d 582 (1985) 480 N.E.2d 1147 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 83-0056. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (5th Division). Opinion filed May 24, 1985. Supplemental opinion filed on denial of rehearing August 2, 1985.

ORDER Manuel Ramos-Rodriguez, a Mexican citizen who was ordered removed in absen-tia after failing to appear in immigration court, challenges the denial of his second motion to reopen the removal proceedings. The Board of Immigration Appeals agreed with the immigration judge that the second motion was number-barred. Because Ramos-Rodriguez never explains in this court why the Board abused its discretion by relying on the numeric limit

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT OR GRANT A NEW TRIAL & ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR DISCOVERY JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge. Defendant Francisco Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”) moves the Court to dismiss the indictment or grant a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(3)(A) and 28 U.S.C. § 1867(a). (Motion, Docket No. 1190.) The United States (“the Government”) timely opp

Peters, J. On June 12, 2007, defendant and codefendant Jack Vincent Johnson were arrested when Kahlil Williams reported that they had threatened him with a knife after he failed to pay a drug debt owed to Johnson. At that time, Williams also informed police that, two weeks earlier, defendant and Johnson had committed a burglary at the apartment that Williams shared with his girlfriend, Nancy Hunsinger. Defendant was thereaft

96 Ill. App.3d 431 (1981) 421 N.E.2d 323 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE RODRIGUEZ et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 79-1027. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (4th Division). Opinion filed May 14, 1981. *432 David R. Jordan, of Chicago, for appellant Jose Rodrigue

Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court. Gunnery Sergeant Carlos J. Rodriguez was convicted at a general court-martial of four offenses involving unlawful sexual acts with children. In its initial review of the case, the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals set aside two specifications and authorized a rehearing. United States v. Rodriguez, No. NMCCA 9900997, 2002 CCA Lexi

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-253V Filed: October 26, 2017 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WILLIAM RODRIGUEZ and * PUBLISHED BRENDA RODRIGUEZ as the * Parents and Natural Guardians of * C.R., a Min

James Rodriguez appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Southwestern Drug Company. We affirm. In 1973 William A. Caudel (Caudel) purchased the Berry Pharmacy from Hugh R. Stewart (Stewart). Payment was by a promissory note executed in the amount of $83,000.00. The note was secured by perfected security interests in the inventory, equipment and fixtures of the pharmacy. Caudel operated the business for five years, however, in May of 1978, Stewart was notified by Caudel that

JUSTICE UNVERZAGT delivered the opinion of the court: The State appeals from an order of the circuit court of Kane County dismissing child abduction charges (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 10—5(b)(1)) against defendant, Michael Doherty, on double jeopardy grounds, because another Kane County court had found him in contempt of court for the same conduct. The marriage of

364 F.3d 424 Dorian DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.Richard RODRIGUEZ, William Rivera, Troy Gordon & City of Hartford, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,Hartford Hospital, Defendant-Appellee,Hartford Police Department & Debra Pachucki, Defendants. No. 03-7207. No. 03-7255. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

BOGGS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which KRUPANSKY, J., joined. MERRITT, J. (pp. 783-85), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. BOGGS, Circuit Judge. Ross Allen Doherty, a Native American and a resident of the Hannahville Indian Community tribal reservation, was convicted in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan of two counts of