Cases

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 25, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 146904

Opinion issued May 29, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00671-CV ——————————— ROXANA JUANA RODRIGO RAMIREZ, Appellant V. ITZEL TORRES, AS INDEPENDENT ADMINI

MEMORANDUM ** Rodrigo Ramirez-Rodriguez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 240-month sentence for conspiracy to deliver methamphetamine and/or cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 851. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Ramirez-Rodriguez contends that the district court erred in various respects by conducting an insufficient guilt

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: Defendant Arturo Gutierrez-Ramirez (Gutierrez-Ramirez) challenges a 16-level enhancement of his sentence based on a prior conviction for a “drug trafficking offense” as authorized by § 2L1.2 (b)(l)(A)(i) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”). We conclude that the district court erred in. using a California abstract of judgment

FILE COPY M A N D A T E TO THE 370TH DISTRICT COURT of HIDALGO COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 9th day of March, 2017, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between Rodrigo Martinez Jr., Appellant, v.

41 F.3d 584 10 IER Cases 102 Dr. Rodrigo RAMIREZ and Barbara Snow, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, Daniel Clute, GeraldD. Goodner, Woodrow Pendergrass, Nancey Prigmore,and Bob LeFlore, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-5105. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Nov. 28, 1994.

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE CHIEF JUSTICE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR ROGELIO VALDEZ CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 361-888-0416 (TEL) JUSTICES

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs/appellants Dr. Rodrigo Ramirez (Ramirez) and Barbara Snow (Snow) appeal the district court’s dismissal pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) of their complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1988, 1985 and 1988, and Oklahoma common law. Their suit complained of disciplinary actions taken against them as employees of the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health (DMH) who worked at the Eastern St

MEMORANDUM ** Pedro Ramirez-Rodriguez (“Ramirez”) entered a plea of guilty to being found unlawfully in the United States after having been deported in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The plea agreement into which Ramirez entered preserved his right to appeal the district court’s determination that venue was proper in the Central District of California. On appeal, Ramirez contends that the district court err

HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Rodrigo Rodriguez-Negrete (“Rodriguez”) appeals his sentence for illegal reentry, contending that the district court erred in imposing a sentence enhancement based on its classification of Rodriguez’s prior state crime as a drug trafficking offense. We find that the documents we are permitted to consult establish that Rodriguez necessarily was convicted

WIENER, Circuit Judge: Today we address the question — res nova in this circuit — who bears the burden of proof once the government establishes probable cause to seize property in a civil forfeiture proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 512, which codifies § 201 of the Motor Vehicle Theft Law Enforcement Act of 1984 (the “Act”). 1

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2023-0640 _____________________________ VICTOR HUGO RAMIREZ, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Oslin Roely Lopez Jimenez, deceased, Appellant, v. BEACH TOWER BY THE SEA, LLC; BY THE SEA RESORTS, INC.; MODERN CONSTRUCTION EXPERTS, LLC; CMR CONSTRUCTION & ROOFING, LLC; ERA S.A.L. SERVICES, INC.; and ELVER N. S

DAVID C. GUADERRAMA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *938Presently before the Court are Defendant City of El Paso, Texas's (the "City of El Paso") "Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Original Complaint" ("El Paso Motion") (ECF No. 8) filed on August 1, 2017, and Defendant Ruben Escajeda, Jr.'s ("Officer Escajeda") "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs'

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 07-1399 & 07-1778 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RODRIGO SOTO-PIEDRA and MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeals from the United States District Cour

i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00384-CV Mireya Garza Rodriguez de ELIZONDO, Appellant v. Rodrigo ELIZONDO,

MEMORANDUM ** Rodrigo Avila Sandoval and Margarita Avila, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

REED, District Judge: Rodrigo Pino-Noriega appeals his conviction for importation of marijuana and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 952, and 960. He claims that he was denied his right to testify in his own defense, that the district court improperly admitted lay opinion testimony as to whether his post-arrest statements “made sense,” a

MEMORANDUM ** Rodrigo Avila Sandoval and Margarita Avila, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, BARKETT, Circuit Judge, and OAKES * , Senior Circuit Judge. *1392 BARKETT, Circuit Judge: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appella