Cases

*840 BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether the fact that a defendant attempted to suppress his confession and chose to proceed to trial rather than to plead guilty makes the defendant ineligible under the United States Sentencing Guidelines for a downward adjustment for acceptance of re

MEMORANDUM*** Because Sanchez-Ochoa’s waiver of his right to appeal was voluntarily, knowingly, and properly entered, it did not violate his right to due process. See, e.g., United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 321-22 (9th Cir.1990). Similarly, because *145the government fully complied with its obligations under the terms of the

[Cite as State v. Ochoa, 2023-Ohio-978.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 5-22-19 v. RODOLFO S. OCHOA, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 5-22-20 v. RODOLFO S. OCHOA,

OPINION TASHIMA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants are 15 migrant farm workers who reside in Arizona who sued Defendant Appellee J.B. Martin and Sons Farms, Inc. (“Martin Farms”), for claims arising under the Agricultural Worker Protection Act (“AWPA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1872 (1999), and Arizona state law. The district court dismissed the action for lack of personal jurisdiction over Martin Farms. A

MEMORANDUM ** Rodolfo Romero-Ochoa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s order denying Romero-Ochoa’s application for cancellation of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings.

MEMORANDUM ** Rodolfo Ochoa-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal, and the BIA’s order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Ochoa-Torres (Ochoa) appeals his conviction for conspiring to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He contends that (1) the government failed to produce substantial evidence to prove that he was a member of the alleged conspiracy at the time of the overt act alleged in the indictment; (2) the court in which he was tried, the United States Di

287 F.3d 1182 Ernesto OCHOA; Pedro Bautista-Botello; Federico Guzman-Delgado; Emigdio Gutierrez-Godinez; Enrique Medina; Masedonio Miranda-Corona; Rosalio Valdez; Jose Vargas; JoseCano-Varela; Miguel Aguayo-Arvayo; Manuel Cebreros; Remedios Chavez-Zamorano; Rodolfo Suchil-Fonseca; Rosario Tello-Fabian; Modesto Coronado-Ramirez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, andFlorencio Carrillo-Valle; Jose Herrera-Herrera, Plaintiffs,v.J.B. MARTIN AND SON

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 11-3575 JULIET T. TAGUPA, APPELLANT, v. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued April 2, 2014

ACCEPTED 13-15-00344-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 12/29/2016 7:01:58 PM Dorian E. R

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 21, 2024 No. 04-23-00334-CR IN RE CERVANTES, et al. Original Proceeding 1 ORDER 1 This proceeding arises out of eighty-five civil bond fo

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00334-CR IN RE CERVANTES, et al. Original Proceeding 1 1 This proceeding arises out of eighty-five civil bond forfeiture cases involving the State of Texas and the following defend

MEMORANDUM ** Rodolfo Velasquez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). To the extent we have jurisdiction it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing legal c

Opinion filed December 30, 2022 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-21-00095-CR __________ HAI PHU NGUYEN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 358th District Court Ector County,

763 F.Supp.2d 786 (2011) Diane J. TAIT, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Criminal Action No. 2:10cr104. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. January 11, 2011. *787 Rodolfo Cejas, II, Federal Public Defender's Office, Norfolk, VA, for Appellant. OPINION AND ORDER

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3751 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Idelfonso Tapia-Rodriguez

690 F.Supp.2d 539 (2010) Domingo GUAJARDO, et al., Plaintiffs v. Juan M. DEANDA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. M-09-153. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, McAllen Division. February 10, 2010. *542 Rodolfo David Sanchez, Texas Riogrande Legal Aid Inc., Weslaco, TX, Sarah E. Donaldson, Texas Riogrande Legal Aid Inc.,

18-1120-cv Tobias Bermudez Chavez, et al. v. Occidental Chemical Corp. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2018 (Argued: March 4, 2019 Decided: August 6, 2021) Docket No. 18-1120-cv TOBIAS BERMUDEZ CHAVEZ, GERARDO ANTONIO FONESCA TORRES, FRANKLIN GUILLEN SALAZAR, GARCIA MONTES JOSE GABINO, MARIANO DE LOS ANGELES PIZARRO, ANTONIO OSORN

FILED 17-0818 12/22/2017 11:17 AM tex-21458098 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHOR

Opinion SIMONS, J. Defendants Rodolfo Puebla Ñapóles (Father) and Teresa Rodriguez (Mother)1 were found guilty of one count of felony child abuse following a joint jury trial. (Pen. Code, § 273a, subd. (a).) The trial court denied probation, sentencing Mother to prison for the four-year middle term and Father to prison for the six-year maximum term. In this appeal, defendants raise