Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rodney G. Stone”
Judgment rendered April 14, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 53,843-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** RODNEY G. THORNHILL P
Stone v. Peoples Trust & Savings Bankpublic domain
363 F.Supp.2d 1036 (2005) Rodney G. STONE and Jeffrey D. Stone, Plaintiff, v. PEOPLES TRUST & SAVINGS BANK, Defendant. No. 3:04-CV-033-RLY-WGH. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Evansville Division. March 28, 2005. Charles A Gall, Jenkens & Gilchrist, Dallas, TX, Fred S. White, Evansville, IN, James Winford Bowen, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff.
In re Stonepublic domain
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DEEM PROOFS OF CLAIMS TIMELY FILED K. RODNEY MAY, Bankruptcy Judge. THIS CASE came on for hearing on April 4, 2012, for consideration of MSMC Venture, LLC’s Motion to Deem Its Proofs of Claims Filed Timely (Doc. No. 29) and supplements thereto (Doc. Nos. 39, 40 and 41). For the reasons stated orally and recorded in open court on May 16, 2012, which shall constitute the d
RODNEY HARMON v. STATE OF ARKANSASpublic domain
Cite as 2020 Ark. 217 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-18-1057 Opinion Delivered: May 28, 2020 RODNEY HARMON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 23CR-15-702] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE CHARLES
Rodney Harmon v. State of Arkansaspublic domain
Cite as 2020 Ark. 217 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-18-1057 Opinion Delivered: May 28, 2020 RODNEY HARMON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 23CR-15-702] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE CHARLES E. C
Rodney Boyett v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 06-15-00024-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/7/2015 12:00:00 AM
Rodney Koon v. State of North Carolinapublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-6616 Doc: 41 Filed: 10/05/2022 Pg: 1 of 60 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-6616 RODNEY A. KOON Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; BRIAN K. WELLS; DIANE K. BROWNING
Skurdal v. State by and Through Stonepublic domain
708 P.2d 1241 (1985) Rodney O. SKURDAL, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. The STATE of Wyoming, acting By and Through the Clerk of the District Court, Kay STONE; Deputy Clerk of the District Court, Julie Stahnke; Campbell County Treasurer, Shirley Study; County Attorney, Mr. Hilderbrand; Wyoming State Auditor, Mr. James Griffith, Appellees (Defendants). No. 84-123. Supreme Court of Wyoming.
State v. Stonepublic domain
HUDSON, Justice. We examine today whether a passenger in a vehicle who gave consent to a generic search for weapons or drugs during a routine *51traffic stop subjected himself to an officer’s flashlight search inside his underwear. Under the circumstances here, we conclude he did not. We hold that this intrusion violated the defendant’s rights under the Fourth Amendmen
State v. Stonepublic domain
STEELMAN, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with the first portion of the majority opinion affirming the trial court’s ruling as to the stop of the vehicle. However, I must respectfully dissent from the second part of the opinion with regard to the scope of defendant’s consent to Officer Correa’s search. The two pertinent questions w
Stone v. Ritterpublic domain
911 A.2d 362 (2006) William STONE and Sandra Stone, derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant AmSOUTH BANCORPORATION, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. C. Dowd RITTER, Ronald L. Kuehn, Jr., Claude B. Nielsen, James R. Malone, Earnest W. Davenport, Jr., Martha R. Ingram, Charles D. McCrary, Cleophus Thomas, Jr., Rodney C. Gilbert, Victoria B. Jackson, J. Harold Chandler, James E. Dalton, Elmer B. Harris, Benjamin F. Payton, and John N. Palmer, De
This is the second appeal of this case. G.B. "Boots" Smith Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Smith") is a Delaware corporation domiciled in the State of Mississippi. Sanwa Business Credit Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Sanwa") is a Delaware corporation domiciled in the State of Illinois. In the first appeal (Sanwa Business Credit Corp. v. G.B."Boots" Smith Corp., 548 So.2d 1336, 1341</
In Re G.P.public domain
Respondent R.P. is the father of the minor child G.P. The trial court found that D.M., the mother of the minor, neglected G.P. in 2004 by providing an injurious environment for the child. On June 17, 2005, at the dispositional hearing, the trial court placed the minor in *Page 492 the custody of father but kept the case open to address visitation with mother. After the dispositional hearing, father filed two separate motions, one in 2006 and one i
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Stonepublic domain
607 S.E.2d 485 (2004) 216 W.Va. 379 STATE of West Virginia ex rel. Elizabeth Ann MILLER, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Rachel M. Miller, Deceased, Petitioner v. The Honorable Robert B. STONE, Judge of the Circuit Court of Monongalia County, West Virginia; and West Virginia University Board of Governors, Respondents. No. 31755. Supreme Court of Appeals of W
IBEW Local Union No. 2150 v. Stonepublic domain
288 Wis.2d 174 (2005) 2005 WI App 251 708 N.W.2d 30 IBEW LOCAL UNION No. 2150, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rodney STONE, Defendant-Respondent. No. 2005AP66. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs August 24, 2005. Decided October 19, 2005. On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was subm
Sarkisyan v. CIGNA Healthcare of California, Inc.public domain
613 F.Supp.2d 1199 (2009) Hilda SARKISYAN and Grigor Sarkisyan, Plaintiffs, v. CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Cigna Healthcare, Inc., and Does 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. CV 09-00335 GAF (RCx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 16, 2009. *1200 Mark J. Geragos, Shelley Kaufman, Tamar G. Arminak
Kirby v. Foxpublic domain
PER CURIAM: This ease is before this Court upon appeal of a final order of the Circuit Court of Morgan County entered on November 25, 1998. The appellant, Penny D. Kirby, contends that the circuit court erred by transferring custody of. her youngest child to her ex-husband, Rodney G. Fox, the appellee, and ordering that custody of her oldest child remain with him. This Court has before it the petition for. appeal, the design
Justice Lehrmann, delivered the opinion of the Court. This case concerns whether the statute of limitations bars a claim for breach of a recorded right of first refusal to purchase a mineral interest. The grantors of the right conveyed the mineral interest to a third party without notifying the holders. More than four years later, the rightholders learned of the conveyance and sued the
COURT OF APPEALS CATHERINE STONE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT KEITH E. HOTTLE CHIEF JUSTICE CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER CLERK OF KAREN ANGELINI 300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200 COURT SANDEE BRYAN MARION SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037 MARIALYN BARNARD WWW.4THCOA.COURTS.STATE.TX.US REBECA C. MARTINEZ
United States v. Rodney Hollomanpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT SLO VITER, Chief Judge. I. Introduction Rodney Holloman was convicted following a jury trial of fourteen counts of possession of counterfeit securities in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 513(a), one count of use of an unassigned social security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B), and two counts of possession of “an implement design