Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CA-00959-COA LAVERN J. SMITH, HELLENA INGRAM, SUSIE APPELLANTS JOHNSON, CECIL JOHNSON, JR., MARION GROTT AND ELLENA LEWIS, HEIRS-AT-LAW OF ETHEL LEE JOHNSON, DECEASED, HEIRS-AT-LAW OF DEMETRICA JOHNSON, DECEASED, AND HEIRS-AT-LAW OF RODNEY JOHNSON, DECEASED v. TYRONE R. ANDERSON, RODNEY JOHNSON, APPELLEES JR., DEONE JOHNS

RAY, Judge. This appeal involves a dispute over church property between the national Christian Methodist Episcopal Church (“CME”)1 and the trustees, pastor, and former members of Bethel Christian Methodist Episcopal Church (jointly hereinafter referred to as “Bethel Church”), a local subordinate church of CME that has sought to disaffiliate from CME and has retained control over the church proper

Breona C. v. Rodney D., No. 0299, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Fader, C.J. CONTEMPT — CIVIL CONTEMPT — NATURE AND ELEMENTS OF CONTEMPT — ACTS OR CONDUCT CONSTITUTING CONTEMPT OF COURT An order holding a person in constructive civil contempt must: (1) impose a sanction; (2) include a purge provision that gives the contemnor the opportunity to avoid the sanction by taking a definite, specific action of which the contemnor is reasonably capable; and (3) be designed to coerce the contemnor’s f

PER CURIAM: This case is before the Court upon the appeal of the Petitioner, Rodney L. Hypes, from the August 12, 2011, Order of the Circuit Court of Nicholas County, West Virginia, re-sentencing the Petitioner to a term of not less than two years nor more than ten years imprisonment for his jury conviction of operating or attempting to operate a clandestine drug laboratory. On a

DOYLE, Presiding Judge. Jane Thomas, as the presiding elder of the Sixth Episcopal District of Georgia of the Christian Methodist Episcopal Church (“the CME”), filed a petition for declaratory judgment and an injunction against Beulah Johnson, Marion Shannon, Jr., Thomas Howard, and Robert Hunt, seeking use and control of the Bethel Christian Methodist Church (“Bethel Church”).

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 20-0158 ══════════ RODNEY DRAUGHON, PETITIONER, V. JOYCIE JOHNSON, RESPONDENT ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ NO. 20-0158 ════════════ RODNEY DRAUGHON, PETITIONER, v. JOYCIE JOHNSON, RESPONDENT ══════════════════════════════════════════════════ O

AFFIRM; Opinion Filed January 22, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01184-CV RODNEY DRAUGHON, Appellant V. JOYCIE JOHNSON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

790 F.Supp.2d 945 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Rodney Vance JOHNSON, Defendant. Case No. 07-CR-305. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. May 10, 2011. Gail J. Hoffman, United States Department of Justice, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff. ORDER DENYING THE GOVERNMENT'S REQUEST FOR RESTITUTION (DOC. #25) C.N. CLEVERT, JR

Case: 18-50826 Document: 00515210658 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-50826 FILED Nove

OPINION Frank G. Clement Jr., P.J., M.S., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Andy D. Bennett and W. Neal McBrayer, JJ., joined. Nieces of the decedent contest the validity of a quitclaim deed and the decedent’s will on the ground they were the result of undue influence exerted upon the decedent

* * * * * * * * * * * The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Baddour and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence. Accordingly, the Full Commission reverses the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner and enters the following Opinion and Award. * * * *

MURPHY, J. iJfhe district court rendered judgment in this case on the petition of the Department of Children and Family Services (“DCFS”), terminating the parental rights of the mother, A.C., and the father, M.C., to the minor child A.M.C.1 A.C. and M.C. appeal from that judgment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. A.M.C. was born on March 16, 2014, and is the minor child

Ruffin, Judge. The juvenile court entered an order terminating the parental rights of the mother of C. T., S. T., Z. K., and L. K.1 The mother appeals, arguing that her rights were terminated without clear and convincing evidence of parental misconduct or inability. She also *187contends that the juvenile court erred in determining that te

PER CURIAM: * This court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. In this contract dispute, plaintiff-appellant claims that she is entitled to Continental’s highest frequent flyer status for life. The magistrate judge addressed all the issues raised by the parties and concluded that the appellant could not demonstrate the existence of a valid

652 S.E.2d 114 (2007) Rodney C. DAVIS v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections. Record No. 070376. Supreme Court of Virginia. November 2, 2007. *115 David B. Hargett (Hargett & Watson, on brief), Glen Allen, for appellant. Robert H. Anderson, III, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Robert F. McD

630 F.3d 970 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Bynard JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-6066. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. November 2, 2010. *971 Ashley L. Altshuler, Special Assistant United States Attorney (Sanford C. Coats, United States Attorney and Jonathon E. Boatman, Assist

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS John Rodney Johnson, FILED Petitioner Below, Petitioner February 22, 2019 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS vs)

540 F.Supp.2d 374 (2008) JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. Harry AINI; Jacob (Jack) Aini; Michael Aini; Rachel (Raquel) Aini; K.A.K. Group, Inc., d/b/a International Beauty Exchange; I.B.E. Cosmetics, Inc., d/b/a IBE Corp., International Beauty Exchange, International Beauty Exchange, Inc; I.C.E. Marketing, Corp., a/k/a I.C.E. International Cosmetics Exchange Marketing; Choul Realty, Inc.; Homeboys International, Inc.;

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: By Memorandum and Order dated September 24, 2014 (hereinafter the “September 24, 2014 Opinion”), this Court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By motion dated September 26, 2014, defendant Manny DaSilva (“DaSilva”) requests that the