Cases

ORDER Archie Bradfield pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to possess and distribute crack cocaine. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). The district court held Brad-field responsible for over 3 kilograms of crack and sentenced him to a total of 242 months’ imprisonment. Bradfield appeals his conviction and sentence, but his appointed counsel has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw under Anders v.

ORDER Valencia Matthews and Christopher Dabney appeal their respective convictions and sentences after they both pleaded guilty to various drug-distribution charges. Matthews challenges the use of a prior conviction to raise the statutory-minimum sentence for her offense. Dabney’s appellate counsel, on the other hand, has explained that he cannot identify any non-frivolous challenge to pursue and has moved to withdraw under Anders

ORDER Archie Bradfield pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to possess and distribute crack cocaine. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). The district court held Brad-field responsible for over 3 kilograms of crack and sentenced him to a total of 242 months’ imprisonment. Bradfield appeals his conviction and sentence, but his appointed counsel has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw under Anders v.

784 So.2d 514 (2001) The ESTATE OF Marco T. REYES, by and through its Personal Representative, Florencia REYES, and on behalf of the claimants to the estate of Marco T. Reyes, Rodgers Reyes, the decedent's minor son, Marco V. Reyes, the decedent's minor son, and Florencia Reyes, as the surviving spouse, Appellant, v. PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, Inc., a foreign corporation, Appellee. No. 3D99-135.

644 F.3d 526 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Igor ASLAN, Mihai Panaitescu, Stefan Dumitru and Adrian Fechete, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 08-1486, 08-1678, 08-3789, 08-4136. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued May 25, 2010. Decided May 12, 2011. *528 Manish S. Shah, Att

452 So.2d 1111 (1984) Sherman H. FRIEDMAN and Martha G. Friedman, His Wife, Appellants, v. U.S. HOME CORPORATION, Clearwater Concrete Industries, Inc., and Robert Fertig, Appellees. No. 83-2168. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. July 13, 1984. *1112 Daniel B. Schuh of Schuh & Schuh, St. Petersburg, for app

RODGERS, Presiding Justice. The opinion in the combined cases of Mississippi State Board of Pharmacy v. Steele and Mississippi State Board of Pharmacy v. Schuh, 317 So.2d 33, this day decided by this Court, is dispositive of the above numbered causes. The judgment of the trial court in these cases is therefore affirmed. Affirmed. GILLESPIE, C. J., a

Bridge, J. Construction of the third runway at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SeaTac) will require placing fill into area wetlands. Before the Army Corps of Engineers may issue a permit to fill wetlands, the project proponent must obtain certification from the State, pursuant to § 401 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1341), stating that there is reasonable assurance that the project will not violate applicable state

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: The defendants in this case — Randy Blankenship, Tammy Blankenship, Howard Glover, and Tarand Transport, Inc.— were convicted of a variety of federal offenses stemming from an affirmative action fraud scheme they perpetrated regarding federally funded road construction projects. We conclude that the district court acted properly in conducting a joint trial of the defendants and that the defendants di

90 P.3d 659 (2004) PORT OF SEATTLE, a port district of the State of Washington, Petitioner, v. The POLLUTION CONTROL HEARINGS BOARD, an agency of the State of Washington, Respondent, Airport Communities Coalition; Citizens Against Seatac Expansion; and State of Washington, Department of Ecology, an agency of the State of Washington, Respondents/Cross-Petitioners. No. 73419-4. Supreme Court of Washi

317 So.2d 33 (1975) MISSISSIPPI STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY v. James T. STEELE. MISSISSIPPI STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY v. Edward L. SCHUH. Nos. 48121, 48122. Supreme Court of Mississippi. July 28, 1975. *34 A.F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by R. Hugo Newcomb, Sr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Watkins, Pyle, Ludlam, Winter & Stennis, Ernest

869 A.2d 751 (2005) 385 Md. 320 Charles D. McDERMOTT v. Hugh J. DOUGHERTY, Sr., et al. No. 58, Sept. Term, 2004. Court of Appeals of Maryland. March 10, 2005. *752 Laura D. Matney (Matney Law Firm, LLC, on the brief), Rockville, for petitioner. *753 J. David Ash,

780 F.Supp. 1225 (1991) Clair BURKE, Plaintiff, v. DEERE & COMPANY, a/k/a John Deere Company, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants. Civ. No. 86-66-W. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, W.D. December 4, 1991. *1226 *1227 *1228

* NOTE: Opinion filed at May Term, 1937, August 26, 1937; motion for rehearing filed; motion overruled December 17, 1937; motion to transfer to Court en Banc filed; motion overruled at May Term, 1938, May 3, 1938. Plaintiff, respondent, sued defendant, appellant, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of the city. A trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plai

MORROW, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff in error, a resident of the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, was defendant in the court below, and the defendant in error, a resident of Lovelock, Pershing county, Nev., was the plaintiff. Plaintiff alleged in a verified complaint: That on the 28th day of July, 1919, he was lawfully walking across a street in the city of Love-lock, state of Nevada, when th

The defendant in error, Guy R. Curry, who will hereinafter at times be referred to as the "plaintiff," brought an action in the district court of Natrona County, against John Murdoch, as defendant, to recover past due rent on certain lands leased by the former to the latter, and also for services asserted to have been performed by him for Murdoch under an alleged oral agreement made between these two men. After the action was commenced Murdoch died and the Casper National Bank being in due co

management of his finances. Albert created GWB Trust into which any interest he may have held in the Estate could be funneled. He then created Renhaw, Inc., and Pentex FILED IN Royalty Trust, 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS int