Cases

PHASE 2A INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPINION Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The plaintiffs in this putative class-action lawsuit are dozens of state prisoners and the Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program (ADAP). The defendants are officials of the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC): the Commissioner and the Associate Commissioner of Health Services.1

621 F.3d 1196 (2010) Dylan Lee DUNN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J. CASTRO; T. Surges; P. Stockman; D. Ortiz; Y. Yamamoto; A.K. Scribner, Defendants-Appellants. No. 08-15957. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 16, 2010.[*] Filed September 14, 2010. *1197 Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Atto

The opinion of the court was delivered by Stegall, J.: John E. Robinson, Sr., was charged with multiple offenses related to the murders of six women—killings that constituted parts of a common scheme or course of conduct whereby Robinson would lure women to Johnson County with offers of employment, travel, and other benefits; exploit them sexually, financially, or otherwise; ldll them and dispose of their bodies

409 F.Supp.2d 1266 (2005) Lynette E. KEEHNER, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Steven Dennis Shirley, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. Charles DUNN a/k/a "Chuck" Dunn, Individually and as Sheriff of Clay County, Kansas, and Clay County, Kansas, Defendants. No. 05-2136-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. December 16, 2005.

DAVIS, Justice: This a criminal appeal by Petitioner, Donald Dunn, from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Raleigh County. Mr. Dunn was convicted of the first degree murder of his stepfather and sentenced to life in prison without mercy. He was also convicted of attempted murder of his mother and sentenced to three to eighteen years in prison. The sentences were ordered to run c

874 So.2d 66 (2004) STATE of Louisiana v. Darrell James ROBINSON. No. 2002-KA-1869. Supreme Court of Louisiana. April 14, 2004. Rehearing Denied June 25, 2004. *70 Danalynn Recer, J. Michael Small, Alexandria, Clive Adrian Safford Smith, New Orleans, for applicant. Charles C. Foti, Jr., Attorney General, J

889 S.W.2d 65 (1994) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Christopher DUNN, Defendant/Appellant. Christopher DUNN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. Nos. 60805, 64621. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. October 25, 1994. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied November 30, 1994.

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #057 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 13th day of December, 2024 are as follows: BY McCallum, J.: 2021-KP-00812 STATE EX REL. DARRELL J. ROBINSON VS. DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, ANGOLA, LOUISIANA (Parish of Rapides) VACATED; TRIAL COURT JUD

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #006 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 26th day of January, 2024 are as follows: BY Weimer, C.J.: 2021-KP-00812 STATE EX REL. DARRELL J. ROBINSON VS. DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, ANGOLA, LOUISIANA (Parish of Rapides) CONVICTION AND SENTENCE

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #006 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 26th day of January, 2024 are as follows: BY Weimer, C.J.: 2021-KP-00812 STATE EX REL. DARRELL J. ROBINSON VS. DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, ANGOLA, LOUISIANA (Parish of Rapides) CONVICTION AND SENTENCE

HILL, Senior Circuit Judge: The appellants, who sought an amendment of one of the rules of The Florida Bar, have voluntarily dismissed their lawsuit, but continue to seek attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The appel-lees deny that appellants are prevailing parties and deny that this case involves any rights secured by the United States Constitution. Thus, the appellees contend that the appellants did not assert a

889 F.2d 1010 Serena DUNN, individually and Willie A. Wiggs, and MarvaPamela Evans, individually and on behalf ofsimilarly situated individuals,Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees,v.THE FLORIDA BAR, the Supreme Court of Florida, Gerald F.Richman, President, The Florida Bar, et al.,Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. No. 88-3865. United States Court of Appeals,

760 F.Supp. 1486 (1991) Lois ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. JACKSONVILLE SHIPYARDS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 86-927-Civ-J-12. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. January 18, 1991. Order, Injunction and Final Judgment March 8, 1991. *1487 *1488

*557 BAUER, Circuit Judge. Hugh Wesley Robinson and National Legal Professional Associates (“NLPA”) appeal a district court order imposing monetary sanctions after the court determined that Robinson and l^LPA (together, “Appellants”) were engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in the Southern Distric

MEMORANDUM OPINION FLAUM, District Judge: Before the court are the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and to compel discovery pertaining to the proposed class, and the defendant’s renewed motion to dismiss for mootness. The gravamen of plaintiff’s claim is that minors found to be neglected pursuant to Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 37 § 702-4 (1975) placed under the guardianship of the Department of Children and

House, C. J. Although these two eases are not, strictly speaking, companion cases, they reached our docket simultaneously, were argued at the same session and involve the same controlling question of law. We have, under the circumstances, decided to consider them in a single written opinion. Both are appeals from judgments of the Superior Court granting petitions for writs of habeas

99 F.3d 1150 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Ik

901 F.2d 1191 INMATES OF THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, Thomas Price Bey,Arthur Goslee, Harry Smith, Robert Maloney, andCalvin Milligan on their own behalf andon behalf of all otherssimilarly situatedv.Cyril H. WECHT, President of Allegheny County Board ofPrison Inspectors and the other members of the Board:Thomas Foerster and William H. Hunt, Commissioners forAllegheny County Eugene Coon, Sheriff for Allegheny Count

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, Senior District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Arson I. Gibbs, Sr. (“plaintiff’) proceeds pro se and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was incarcerated at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center (“VCC”), Smyrna, Delaware, when he initiated this lawsuit. He has since been released. He raises medical needs claims pursuant to 42 U

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I.INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Arson I, Gibbs, Sr. (“plaintiff’) proceeds pro. se and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was incarcerated at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center (“VCC”), Smyrna, Delaware, when he initiated this lawsuit. He has since been released. He raises medical needs claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §