Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Robinson v. Carl's Cafe, Inc.”
Cotton Patch Cafe, Inc. v. Carl McCartypublic domain
</
Cotton Patch Cafe, Inc. v. Carl McCartypublic domain
Cotton Patch Cafe, Inc. v. Carl McCarty COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-05-082-CV COTTON PATCH CAFÉ, INC. APPELLANT
Nike Inc. v. Variety Wholesalers, Inc.public domain
274 F.Supp.2d 1352 (2003) NIKE INC., Plaintiff, v. VARIETY WHOLESALERS, INC. d/b/a Rose's Stores, Inc., Defendant. No. CV 402-182. United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division. July 22, 2003. *1354 Patrick T. O'Connor, Paul Hughes Threlkeld, Oliver, Maner & Gray, LLP, Savannah, GA, Louis S. Ederer, Neil S. Go
Smith v. LEAD IND. ASS'N, INC.public domain
871 A.2d 545 (2005) 386 Md. 12 Reginald SMITH, Jr., et al. v. LEAD INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION, INC., et al. No. 68, September Term, 2004. Court of Appeals of Maryland. April 4, 2005. *546 Edward J. Lilly and Ronald E. Richardson (Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos, on brief), Baltimore, for petitioners. Ph
Elishah Sawyers, Pax Crate & Freight, Inc. and Robin Sawyers v. Marc Carter and Sally Carterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
817 F.Supp. 1103 (1993) MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PROPERTIES, INC. and Los Angeles Dodgers, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. SED NON OLET DENARIUS, LTD., d/b/a The Brooklyn Dodger Sports Bar & Restaurant, Bums, Inc., d/b/a The Brooklyn Dodger, David Senatore, Richard Picardi and Kevin Boyle, Defendants. No. 90 CIV 2170 (CBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 6, 1993.
North East Texas Motor Lines, Inc. v. Dicksonpublic domain
Mr. Chief Justice Hickman delivered the opinion of the Court. In this suit filed by petitioner North East Texas Motor *37Lines, Inc., a permanent injunction was issued in the trial court against a labor organization, referred to in the record as Local No. 745, Teamsters Union, A. F. of L., its officers and representatives, certain individual employees or fo
Mr. Justice Hays delivered the opinion of the court. During the month of September, 1945, five cases were filed in the district court of the City and County' of Denver, allegedly growing out of the activities of the defendants in the attempt to unionize certain of plaintiffs and their employees engaged in hauling, processing and distributing milk in the Denver area. Said suits were entitled: Denver Milk Produ
Menard v. Statepublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Apeldyn Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The court issued its memorandum order on claim construction and memorandum opinion resolving the pending summary judgment motions on infringement and validity on November 15, 2011. (D.I. 626, 627) Thereby, the court denied AUO’s motions for summary judgment of invalidity and of noninfringement1
State v. Honschpublic domain
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ROBERT HONSCH (SC 20742) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Dannehy and Moll, Js. Syllabus Convicted of murder in connection with the disappearance and death of his daughter, E, the defendant appealed to this court. In September, 1995, E’s body was discovered in New Britain. E’s remains were wrapped in trash bags and sleeping bags, and, although the police w
A & J PRODUCE CORP. v. Changpublic domain
385 F.Supp.2d 354 (2005) A & J PRODUCE CORP., Plaintiffs, v. Sung L. CHANG d/b/a MC Park, Sung L. Chang d/b/a MC PM, Natural Farms, Inc., Jong Kim, Bergen Farms Market, Inc., Jong Soo Lee, Union Farm, Inc., Kyu Jin Shon, Woodbridge Farm, Inc., Sung Sik Park, Teaneck Rd. Farms, Inc., Heuk S. Lee, Theresa & Joseph Corp., and Onyi Nam, Defendants. No. 03 Civ. 9951(HB). United States District Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC., BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD, PACIFIC D.C. No. GROSERVICE, INC., DBA Pitco 3:15-md-02670- Foods, CAPITOL HILL DMS-MDD SUPERMARKET, LOUISE ANN DAVIS MATTHEWS, JAMES WALNUM, COLIN MOORE, JENNIFER A. NELSON, OPINION ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG, LAURA CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; T
Exxon Co., U.S.A. v. State Highway Administrationpublic domain
RODOWSKY, Judge. This case presents a constitutional challenge to a condition included in a special exception for the remodeling of a gasoline filling station and in a permit to construct facilities within a planned right-of-way. We do not reach the constitutional issue, however, because the challenge should have been made when the allegedly unconstitutional condition was imposed and because the challenger acquiesced in the co
O'DELL v. Stegallpublic domain
703 S.E.2d 561 (2010) Michael J. O'DELL, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. Robert and Virginia STEGALL Defendants Below, Appellants, and Sidney Seibert, Clifford E. and Mary Belle Starliper, and Donald E. and Patricia Walker, Defendants Below. No. 35488. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 21, 2010. Decided November 24, 2010.
SALEM GROUP, FARMERS MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO. v. Oliverpublic domain
248 N.J. Super. 265 (1991) 590 A.2d 1194 THE SALEM GROUP, FARMERS MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CARL OLIVER, DALLAS NEWMAN, THOMAS CIMINO, WHITEHEAD BROTHERS, INC., T/A WHIBCO, INC., MAYS LANDING SAND & GRAVEL, A DIVISION OF VINELAND TRANSIT MIX, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued December
B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Murthapublic domain
815 F.Supp. 539 (1993) The B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, et al. v. Harold MURTHA, et al. v. RISDON CORPORATION, et al. No. N-87-52 (PCD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. January 12, 1993. *540 Mark Mininberg, New Haven, CT, William A. Butler, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Washington, DC, for defendants.</
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201
Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Spierspublic domain
Kyle, P. J. This case is before us on appeal by the Mississippi State Highway Commission from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Pearl River County rendered in favor of the appellees, James C. Spiers and his wife, for the sum of $50,000, as compensation and damages for the taking of a strip of land, containing 43.78 acres, to be used for highway right of way purposes in the construction of a new interstate highway running thro
ACCEPTED 01-15-00423-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/6/2015 7:40:32 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE