⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Robinson v. Carl's Cafe, Inc.”

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2006-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
</
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2006-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
Cotton Patch Cafe, Inc. v. Carl McCarty COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-05-082-CV COTTON PATCH CAFÉ, INC. APPELLANT
District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2003-07-22 · Published · cited 17× · 274 F. Supp. 2d 1352; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13310; 2003 WL 21782289
274 F.Supp.2d 1352 (2003) NIKE INC., Plaintiff, v. VARIETY WHOLESALERS, INC. d/b/a Rose's Stores, Inc., Defendant. No. CV 402-182. United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division. July 22, 2003. *1354 Patrick T. O'Connor, Paul Hughes Threlkeld, Oliver, Maner & Gray, LLP, Savannah, GA, Louis S. Ederer, Neil S. Go
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2005-04-04 · Published · cited 25× · 871 A.2d 545; 386 Md. 12; 2005 Md. LEXIS 169
871 A.2d 545 (2005) 386 Md. 12 Reginald SMITH, Jr., et al. v. LEAD INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION, INC., et al. No. 68, September Term, 2004. Court of Appeals of Maryland. April 4, 2005. *546 Edward J. Lilly and Ronald E. Richardson (Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos, on brief), Baltimore, for petitioners. Ph
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-04-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
District Court, S.D. New York · 1993-04-06 · Published · cited 26× · 817 F. Supp. 1103; 26 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1731; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4608; 1993 WL 105434
817 F.Supp. 1103 (1993) MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PROPERTIES, INC. and Los Angeles Dodgers, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. SED NON OLET DENARIUS, LTD., d/b/a The Brooklyn Dodger Sports Bar & Restaurant, Bums, Inc., d/b/a The Brooklyn Dodger, David Senatore, Richard Picardi and Kevin Boyle, Defendants. No. 90 CIV 2170 (CBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 6, 1993.
Texas Supreme Court · 1949-03-23 · Published · cited 27× · 148 Tex. 35; 219 S.W.2d 795; 11 A.L.R. 2d 1065; 1949 Tex. LEXIS 381; 23 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2514
Mr. Chief Justice Hickman delivered the opinion of the Court. In this suit filed by petitioner North East Texas Motor *37Lines, Inc., a permanent injunction was issued in the trial court against a labor organization, referred to in the record as Local No. 745, Teamsters Union, A. F. of L., its officers and representatives, certain individual employees or fo
Supreme Court of Colorado · 1947-05-19 · Published · cited 20× · 183 P.2d 529; 116 Colo. 389; 1947 Colo. LEXIS 328; 20 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2689
Mr. Justice Hays delivered the opinion of the court. During the month of September, 1945, five cases were filed in the district court of the City and County' of Denver, allegedly growing out of the activities of the defendants in the attempt to unionize certain of plaintiffs and their employees engaged in hauling, processing and distributing milk in the Denver area. Said suits were entitled: Denver Milk Produ
Menard v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2023-04-25 · Published · cited 3× · 346 Conn. 506
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
District Court, D. Delaware · 2011-12-19 · Published · cited 0× · 831 F. Supp. 2d 837; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145863; 2011 WL 6357773
MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The court issued its memorandum order on claim construction and memorandum opinion resolving the pending summary judgment motions on infringement and validity on November 15, 2011. (D.I. 626, 627) Thereby, the court denied AUO’s motions for summary judgment of invalidity and of noninfringement1
State v. Honschpublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024-07-19 · Published · cited 8× · 349 Conn. 783
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ROBERT HONSCH (SC 20742) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Dannehy and Moll, Js. Syllabus Convicted of murder in connection with the disappearance and death of his daughter, E, the defendant appealed to this court. In September, 1995, E’s body was discovered in New Britain. E’s remains were wrapped in trash bags and sleeping bags, and, although the police w
District Court, S.D. New York · 2005-04-04 · Published · cited 11× · 385 F. Supp. 2d 354; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5521; 2005 WL 757253
385 F.Supp.2d 354 (2005) A & J PRODUCE CORP., Plaintiffs, v. Sung L. CHANG d/b/a MC Park, Sung L. Chang d/b/a MC PM, Natural Farms, Inc., Jong Kim, Bergen Farms Market, Inc., Jong Soo Lee, Union Farm, Inc., Kyu Jin Shon, Woodbridge Farm, Inc., Sung Sik Park, Teaneck Rd. Farms, Inc., Heuk S. Lee, Theresa & Joseph Corp., and Onyi Nam, Defendants. No. 03 Civ. 9951(HB). United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-04-08 · Published · cited 217× · 31 F.4th 651
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC., BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD, PACIFIC D.C. No. GROSERVICE, INC., DBA Pitco 3:15-md-02670- Foods, CAPITOL HILL DMS-MDD SUPERMARKET, LOUISE ANN DAVIS MATTHEWS, JAMES WALNUM, COLIN MOORE, JENNIFER A. NELSON, OPINION ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG, LAURA CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; T
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999-06-16 · Published · cited 0× · 1999 Md. LEXIS 333; 354 Md. 530; 731 A.2d 948
RODOWSKY, Judge. This case presents a constitutional challenge to a condition included in a special exception for the remodeling of a gasoline filling station and in a permit to construct facilities within a planned right-of-way. We do not reach the constitutional issue, however, because the challenge should have been made when the allegedly unconstitutional condition was imposed and because the challenger acquiesced in the co
O'DELL v. Stegallpublic domain
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010-11-24 · Published · cited 48× · 703 S.E.2d 561; 226 W. Va. 590; 2010 W. Va. LEXIS 153
703 S.E.2d 561 (2010) Michael J. O'DELL, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. Robert and Virginia STEGALL Defendants Below, Appellants, and Sidney Seibert, Clifford E. and Mary Belle Starliper, and Donald E. and Patricia Walker, Defendants Below. No. 35488. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 21, 2010. Decided November 24, 2010.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991-05-08 · Published · cited 14× · 590 A.2d 1194; 248 N.J. Super. 265
248 N.J. Super. 265 (1991) 590 A.2d 1194 THE SALEM GROUP, FARMERS MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CARL OLIVER, DALLAS NEWMAN, THOMAS CIMINO, WHITEHEAD BROTHERS, INC., T/A WHIBCO, INC., MAYS LANDING SAND & GRAVEL, A DIVISION OF VINELAND TRANSIT MIX, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued December
District Court, D. Connecticut · 1993-01-12 · Published · cited 14× · 815 F. Supp. 539; 23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21081; 36 ERC (BNA) 1705; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3706; 1993 WL 15183
815 F.Supp. 539 (1993) The B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, et al. v. Harold MURTHA, et al. v. RISDON CORPORATION, et al. No. N-87-52 (PCD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. January 12, 1993. *540 Mark Mininberg, New Haven, CT, William A. Butler, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Washington, DC, for defendants.</
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-01-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1965-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 251 Miss. 885; 172 So. 2d 208; 1965 Miss. LEXIS 915
Kyle, P. J. This case is before us on appeal by the Mississippi State Highway Commission from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Pearl River County rendered in favor of the appellees, James C. Spiers and his wife, for the sum of $50,000, as compensation and damages for the taking of a strip of land, containing 43.78 acres, to be used for highway right of way purposes in the construction of a new interstate highway running thro
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00423-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/6/2015 7:40:32 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE