Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck P.C. v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, L.L.P.”
Lowell v. Lyft, Inc.public domain
B. Plaintiff WDOMI According to Defendant, Plaintiff WDOMI lacks associational or organizational standing to file this action. (Def.'s Mot. pp. 13 - 18.) 1. Associational Standing An organization has associational standing if it can show that (1) its members would have standing to sue in their own right; (2) the interests it seeks to protect relate to the organizat
OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge. This is a maritime action for breach of contract and unjust enrichment based on Defendants’ alleged failure to pay brokerage commissions in connection with thirteen contracts, called charter parties. Before the Court on remand from the Second Circuit is Defendants’ renewed request to compel arbitration on Plaintiffs’ claims. For the following
Lapina v. Men Women N.Y. Model Management Inc.public domain
OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Defendant Men Women N.Y. Model Management Inc. (“Women NY”) has moved to compel plaintiffs Ginta Lapina (“Lapina”) and Gingin Management Ltd. (“Gingin,” together with Lapina, the “Plaintiffs”) to arbitrate their claims against Women NY. Based on the conclusions set forth below, the motion is granted and the Plaintiffs are directed to proceed to arbitration.
Spinelli v. National Football Leaguepublic domain
REDACTED OPINION * SWEET, District Judge. There are several motions currently pending in this action between plaintiffs Paul Spinelli, Scott Boehm, Paul Jasienski, George Newman Lowrance, David Stluka,' David Drapkin, and Thomas E. Witte *91(“Plaintiffs”) and defendants National Football League (“NFL”), NFL P
In re A2P SMS Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Club Texting, Inc. (“Club Texting”), iSpeedbuy LLC (“iSpeedbuy”), and TextPower, Inc. (“TextPower”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), bring this putative class action alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act of 1890 (the “Sherman Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2. Plaintiffs bring these claims, as alleged in their second