Cases

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from the grant of a preliminary injunction that was issued on October 27-, 2016 arid was last amended on November 22, 2016. W. Ala. Women’s Ctr. v. Miller, 217 F.Supp.3d 1313 (M.D. Ala. 2016), The appeal was scheduled to be orally argued before this Court at 9:00 a.m. on Friday morning, October 27, 2017. At a

JUSTICE LOPEZ, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 The issue in this case is whether the Arizona Department of Water Resources ("ADWR") is required to consider unquantified federal reserved water rights when it determines whether a developer has an adequate water supply for purposes of A.R.S. § 45-108. We hold that the statute does not require ADWR to do so. I. F

ORDER AND JUDGMENT ** WESLEY E. BROWN, District Judge. In this Social Security case, the administrative law judge (ALJ) determined that the minor daughter of Robin Miller suffers from the severe impairments of attention defícit/hyperactivity disorder, a central auditory processing disorder (CAPD), and oppositional/defiant disorder. Evaluating the case under the Commissioner’s chi

MANSFIELD, Justice. This case, although procedurally different from Rilea v. Iowa Department of Transportation , 919 N.W.2d 380 , 2018 WL 5090853

OPINION AND ORDER Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs West Alabama Women’s Center, a Tuscaloosa clinic that provides abortions and other reproductive-health services, and William J. Parker, M.D., the clinic’s physician, filed this as-applied Fourteenth Amendment challenge to an abortion regulation with which they could not comply and which had forced the clinic to close. The defendant

Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In West Alabama Women's Center v. Miller , 217 F.Supp.3d 1313 (M.D. Ala. 2016) (Thompson, J.), this court preliminarily enjoined enforcement of two Alabama statutes, enacted on May 12, 2016, that regulate abortions and abortion clinics. The court must now addr

OPINION Myron H. Thompson, United States District Judge Providers of abortion and other reproductive-health services in Alabama challenge two 2016 state statutes that regulate abortions and abortion clinics. The first statute, which the court will call the “school-proximity law,” provides that the Alabama Department of Public Health may not issue or renew licenses to abortion clinics located within 2,0

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROBIN KNIGHT, derivatively on behalf ) of Nominal Defendant UNIVERSAL ) HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0581-SG ) ALAN B. MILLER, MARC D. MILLER, ) STEVE G. FILTON, LAWRENCE S. ) GIBBS, EILEEN C. Mc

Opinion SIGGINS, J. Keith Knapp and his company Home Loan Service Corporation (CHL) tread a path to this court that is well worn by their various codefendants in Noreen Cardinale’s long-fought action arising from an abusive loan scheme. (See Cardinale v. Miller (May 17, 2010, Al25546) [nonpub. opn.] (Cardinale v. Miller 3); Cardinale v. Miller (Jan. 31, 2005, A100606) [nonpub. opn.];

SANDRA CABRINA JENKINS, Judge. 1 \ Defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment granting a preliminary injunction in favor of Plaintiff. First, we find no legal error in the trial court’s granting the Plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction. Second, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding the Plaintiffs made a prima facie showing of irreparable harm. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court

Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 25 Digitally signed by Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Date: 2022.08.19 09:43:59 DIVISION IV -05'00' No. CR-20-256 Adobe Acrobat version: 2022.002.20191 Opinion Delivered: January 20, 2021 ROBIN MILLER RICHARD

Sam A. Lindsay, United States District Judge Before the court are: Defendant City of Irving's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 35), filed June 6, 2017; Defendant Irving Independent School District's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 38), filed June 29, 2017; Defendant Daniel Cummings's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 39), filed June 29, 2017; Defenda

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Relator, Mark W. Miller, filed this original action in mandamus against the Cuyahoga County sheriff. Frank Bova held that office at the time this litigation commenced, and therefore all prior rulings in this case were issued under the caption State ex rel. Miller v. Bova. Clifford Pinkney currently serves as Cuyahoga County sheriff and has b

ZACHARY, Judge. *438 Ms. E.B. ("respondent") appeals from an order establishing a guardianship for her minor child M.B. ("Max"). 2 We affirm. I. Background The Durham County D

699 F.Supp.2d 697 (2010) Darren L. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey BEARD, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-1080. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 18, 2010. *699 Matthew P. Faranda-Diedrich, Jordan M. Rand, Patrick M. Northen, Dilworth Paxson LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. Randall J. Henzes

WOLLMAN, Chief Judge. Robin Hill brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Kevin McKinley, Michael Miller, Timothy Shoppe, Barry Thomas, and Jennifer Holmes, all jail guards, Paul Fitzgerald, Sheriff of Story County, Iowa, and Michelle Bahr, the jail matron, violated her Fourth Amendment right to privacy. Hill also alleged a violation of her privacy rights under Iowa state law. The defendants raised the defense

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff-Appellant Audra Lynn Harris is a former inmate of Bedford Hills Correctional Facility. She testified at her deposition that, while incarcerated at Bed-ford Hills, a male officer and three female officers entered her room to take down cotton that she had removed from her mattress and pasted to her room’s windows. The male officer then demanded to know if Harris had any more cotton. According to Harris’s test

246 B.R. 559 (2000) In re Larry E. MILLER, Debtor. Larry E. Miller, Plaintiff, v. Deborah G. Miller, Defendant. Deborah G. Miller, Plaintiff, v. Larry E. Miller, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 98-32982, Adversary Nos. 99-3156, 99-3187. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee. February 9, 2000. *560 Richard M. Ma

67 Ill. App.3d 656 (1978) 384 N.E.2d 889 DAVID ROBIN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DOROTHY J. MILLER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 76-482. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (3rd Division). Opinion filed December 13, 1978. *657 Irving Fasman, of Horwitz, Anesi, Ozmon & Associates, of Chicago, for

OPINION ANDERSON, Paul H„ Justice. Appellant David Miller purchased a home owned by respondents Linda Lan-kow and Jim Betz, which home had been extensively remediated because of moisture intrusion damage. Respondents Don-nelly Brothers and Total Service Company and defendant Diversified Contractors, Inc., did the remediation work on the home. After moving into the home, Miller discovered additional moisture