Cases

ACCEPTED 13-14-00656-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 2/23/2015 4:3

93 Wn.2d 510 (1980) 610 P.2d 1322 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JOYCE ANNA SHIPP, Defendant, ATIS WALTER KRUMINS, Appellant. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. CHESTER E. VAN ANTWERP, Petitioner. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DARWIN GARY HINZ, Petitioner. Nos. 45273, 46322, 46289. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

428 F.3d 559 TEST MASTERS EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.; Vivek Israni, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Robin SINGH, doing business as Testmasters, Defendant-Appellant.Robin Singh Educational Services, Inc., a California Corporation, doing business as Testmasters, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.Test Masters Educational Services, Inc., a Texas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,Vivek Israni, Defendant-Appellee.Test

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 5, 2005 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HAROLD L. CASSELL Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2004-A-292 J. Randall Wyatt, Jr., Judge No. M2004-01784-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 5, 2005 The defendant, Harold L. Cassell, entered an agreed plea to domestic as

ROBIN F. WYNNE, Associate Justice |, Appellant Mike Wilson filed this illegal-exaction suit in the Pulaski County Circuit Court alleging that certain acts of 2015, which appropriated funds from the Arkansas General Improvement Fund (GIF) to eight planning and development districts, are unconstitutional. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Wilson now appeals, and the

754 F.2d 1427 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Margaret Elaine WILKINSON, a/k/a "Jane Doe", a/k/a "Tippy",Ella Shipp, a/k/a "Ella Stitman", McAvoy Joseph Shipp, a/k/a"Shipp", a/k/a McAvoy Shipp, a/k/a "Mac", Wilfred C. Burch,a/k/a "Billy", Defendants-Appellants.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Walter Lee HILL, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-98, 455, Docket 84-1108-1111, 84-1238.

14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

724 F.Supp.2d 1173 (2010) Lance COLLINS, Petitioner, v. H.A. LEDEZMA, Warden, Respondent.[1] No. CIV-09-197-C. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. May 19, 2010. *1174 Lance Collins, El Reno, OK, pro se. ORDER OF DISMISSAL ROBIN J. CAUTHRON, District Judge. This action for

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Sam A. Lindsay, United States District Judge Before the court are: Defendant City of Irving’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8), filed October 6, 2016; Defendant Irving Independent School District’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike (Doc. 10), filed October 11, 2016; Defendant Daniel Cummings’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike (Doc. 11), filed October 11, 2016; and Defenda

Pfeifer, J., dissenting. {¶ 49} What the majority does today is unheard of. It revisits a case decided over 30 years ago, declares that that case’s holding should be applied prospectively only, and thereby exempts an entire class of defendants from strict tort liability. Today’s holding is an affront to stare decisis, runs contrary to our own case law, and makes a mockery of the Chevron Oil test while

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 21-2092 _______________________ CINDY ADAM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant v. FRANK V. BARONE; KIRILL CHUMENKO; GREEN POGO LLC (Delaware); GREEN POGO LLC (New Jersey); NATURAL BEAUTY LINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CA-01227-SCT NEWTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI v. DEERFIELD ESTATES SUBDIVISION PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, LLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/27/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. H. DAVID CLARK, II TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: JAY MAX KILPATRICK ROBERT MARTIN ALLEN, JR. WILL

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 17, 2012 Session NATHAN CORDELL BURKEEN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 16485 Robert L. Holloway, Judge No. M2010-02302-CCA-R3-PC - Filed June 21, 2012 The petitioner, Nathan Cordell Burkeen, appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction rel

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 23-1859 ____________ LINDSEY GULDEN; DAMIAN BURCH, Appellants v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION ____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

Filed 9/17/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 232 Rocky Norby, Plaintiff, Appellant and Cross-Appellee v. Estate of Doris W. Kuykend

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge. THIS IS a confirmed Chapter 11 case and the matters under consideration are two Motions. One is the Debtors’ Motion for Rehearing to Reconsider, Alter, Amend or Clarify Order on Motion to Vacate Order Granting Debtors’ Motion to Modify Confirmed Plan. The other is the Motion of Waterford South, Inc., to Amend Order on Motion to Vacate Order

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Plaintiffs”) are direct or indirect victims of terrorist acts linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”), against which they hold unsatisfied money judgments. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to enforce these judgments against Defendants-Appellants Alavi Foundation and 650 Fifth Avenue Company (together, “Defendants”),1 pursuant to the Forei

850 F.Supp. 256 (1994) CADBURY BEVERAGES, INC., Plaintiff, v. COTT CORPORATION and Cott Beverages USA, Inc., Defendants. No. 92 Civ. 6207 (KTD). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 11, 1994. *257 Robin, Blecker, Daley & Driscoll, New York City, for plaintiff; Albert Robin, Howard B. Barnaby, of counsel.

EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge: The petition for review in this case, filed by the American Tort Reform Association (“ATRA”), challenges revisions made by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA” or “the agency”) to the wording of paragraph (a)(2) of OSHA’s hazard communication (“HazCom”) standard, 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200. HazCom establishes labeling requirements for

573 S.E.2d 376 (2002) MATHIS v. CANNON. No. S02G0361. Supreme Court of Georgia. November 25, 2002. Reconsideration Denied December 13, 2002. *377 James W. Hurt, James W. Hurt & Associates, Thomas Harry Hurt, Hurt & Associates, Cordele, for Appellant. James C. Rawls, Eric Peter Schroeder, Powell, Go