Cases

Opinion of the Court WISS, Judge: At his general court-martial, appellant pleaded not guilty to a specification alleging malingering by self-inflicting injury in a hostile fire pay zone for the purpose of avoiding service as an enlisted person, in violation of Article 115, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 915. Under a pretrial agreement, however, he pleaded guilty to a lesser-included

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA RANDALL WARD WOLFFE, ) ) Supreme Court

OPINION OF THE COURT WERNER, Judge: In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was found guilty by a military judge *734sitting as a general court-martial of wrongfully and intentionally inflicting injury upon himself in a hostile fire pay zone, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ

REL: February 10, 2023 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER T

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: In 1995, the Sea Robin Pipeline Company petitioned the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a declaration that Sea Robin’s facilities perform a “gathering” function rather than a “transportation” function, thus exempting them from the Commission’s jurisdiction under Section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717(b). The Commission,

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS May 7, 2015 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS CARL RAMSEY,

Reversed and Dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed October 18, 2018. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00738-CV ASHLEY ALLEN, Appellant v. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF HOUSTON, INC., AND ROBIN DAVIS, Appellees On Appeal from the County Civil Ct. at Law No. 3

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS State of West Virginia, Plaintiff Below, FILED Respondent January 17, 2014 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COU

555 F.3d 1199 (2009) RAMSEY WINCH INC.; Auto Crane Company; ConocoPhillips; Norris, a Dover Resources Company; DP Manufacturing, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Tulsa Winch, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. C. Brad HENRY, Governor of the State of Oklahoma; W.A. Drew B. Edmonson, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, and their Agents and Successors, Defendants-Appellants, National Rifle Association; The Brady Center to

Defendant, Robin Eugene Ramsey, appeals from a conviction under an indictment charging that he "unlawfully did possess secobarbital sodium and amobarbital sodium, salts of barbital." The jury returned the following verdict: "We, the jury, find the defendant guilty as charged in the indictment and assess a fine of $1.00." The court assessed additional punishment of two years in the penitentiary. The state's evidence tended to show that on September 5, 1964, Detectives Romagnano

615 N.W.2d 854 (2000) Carmen Yolanda Berrios RIVERA, petitioner, Respondent, and Angel Louis Montanez-Torres, Respondent, v. RAMSEY COUNTY, Appellant, New York City Law Department, Respondent. No. C4-00-99. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. August 7, 2000. *855 Carmen Yolanda Berrios Rivera, Jackson Heights, N.Y. (pro se res

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-3787 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARTHUR L. RAMSEY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinoi

111 F.Supp.2d 1030 (2000) Amanda J. RAMSEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 3:97-CV-0764RM. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. August 29, 2000. *1031 Mark Allen Scott, Daniel J. Harrigan, Bayliff Harrigan Cord and Maugans, Kokomo, for Amanda J. Ramsey, Pe

MEMORANDUM OPINION SAMUEL DER-YEGHIAYAN, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Dyson, Inc.’s (Dyson) motion for partial summary judgment. This matter is also before the court on Defendant Bissell Homecare, Inc.’s (Bissell) motion to exclude the expert report of Ran Kivetz (Kivetz), Bissell’s motion to disqualify Susan Goldsmith (Goldsmith) from serving as an expert, an

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Katie Danner and Masie Ramsey, Plaintiffs Below, Petitioners FILED November 20, 2015 vs) No. 14-1214 (Jefferson County 12-C-103J) RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS In Re: M.K. & C.K. FILED March 16, 2015 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK No. 14-1117 (Wood County 14-JA-36 & 14-JA-37) SUPREME COURT OF APP

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 11, 2003 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM RAMSEY Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Warren County No. F-8152 Charles D. Haston, Judge No. M2001-02735-CCA-R3-CD - Filed July 15, 2003 The defendant was convicted by a Warren County Circuit Court jury of on

STEWART, Justice: Defendant Robin Charles Ramsey was convicted of two counts of sexual abuse of a child. Count I alleged that defendant caused his five-year-old son (hereinafter “son” or “boy”), to take indecent liberties with his three-year-old daughter (hereinafter “daughter” or “girl”), and count II alleged that defendant unlawfully touched the genitalia of the girl. Another count, which alleged that defendant unlawfully to

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 296 SYLLABUS 1. Minnesota Statutes § 340A.409 , subdivision 1 (2008), does not require insurance coverage for pecuniary loss. 2. The plain language of Minn. Stat. § 340A.409 , subd. 1, provides that pecuniary loss co

SYLLABUS Statutory immunity under Minn.Stat. § 253B.23 , subd. 4 (2008), applies to an examiner's good-faith decision that a proposed patient cannot be placed on a 72-hour emergency hold. OPINION This appeal arises out of a medical-negligence and wrongful-death action against three physicians, a hospital, and a clinic for alleged negligent treatment of a patient who later killed his mother a