Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Robin A. Roberts”
United States v. Robin Peavlerpublic domain
SUTTON, Circuit Judge. *747 When people enter drug treatment, their doctors often order urinalysis exams to monitor their progress. Doctors understandably prefer to get those exam results soon after ordering the tests to tailor future treatments. The five criminal defendants in this case sta
Sameh Hussein v. Robin Barrettpublic domain
OPINION BASTIAN, District Judge: Sameh Hussein, a lawful permanent resident, appeals the district court’s denial of his naturalization application. After a bench trial, which followed a decision adverse to Hussein by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (US-CIS), the district court concluded that Hussein failed to satisfy his statutory
Roberts v. Robertspublic domain
ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice, dissenting. I would not send this case back for rebriefing just to include the hearing where Robin Roberts (now Yang) testified about her residency in Arkansas. My reason for concluding as I do is that rebriefing is not necessary. The jurisdictional issue raised is whether it is required by statute that Robin Yang reside
Robin Bair v. Robert Callahanpublic domain
RILEY, Chief Judge. Robert A. Callahan, M.D., performed an unsuccessful spinal fusion surgery on Robin Bair. Bair and Francis Zephier, Bair’s wife, (collectively, appellants) sued Callahan for negligence and loss of consortium. After the jury found in favor of Callahan, the appellants moved for a new trial, arguing (1) the district court
Robin Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.public domain
OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge: In this case, the plaintiff claimed copyright infringement. But the contents of the copyrighted work and the allegedly infringing works were never introduced into evidence. The district court held that the claim failed as a matter of law. We agree, and affirm. I. Background
United States v. Robin Robertspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-3567 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Robin Roberts Defendan
Roberts v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appellant appeals the denial of his Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence filed pursuant to rule 3.8Ó0, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Appellant was convicted of aggravated battery, and the jury found that he used a firearm to inflict great bodily injury on the victim. The offense was enhanced from a second-degree felony to a first-degree felony based on the use of the firearm, pursuant to section 775.087, Flo
Robin v. Binionpublic domain
469 F.Supp.2d 375 (2007) August ROBIN, et al. v. Jack B. BINION, et al. Civil Action No. 04-1695. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Shreveport Division. January 4, 2007. *376 *377 James M. Williams, John W. Houghtaling, Stephen Micheal Huber, Gauthier Houghtaling & Williams, Me
Roberts v. Statepublic domain
46 So.3d 1057 (2010) Dwayne E. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D10-1572. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. October 8, 2010. Rehearing Denied November 8, 2010. Dwayne E. Roberts, Avon Park, pro se. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona
Roberts v. Statepublic domain
76 So.3d 1047 (2011) Tracey ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D11-1613. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. December 16, 2011. *1048 James S. Purdy, Public Defender, David S. Morgan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahasse
Roberts v. Yangpublic domain
ELANA CUNNINGHAM WILLS, Justice. liThis case is the second appeal originating from the divorce proceedings involving appellant Christopher Roberts and appel-lee Robin Yang. The supreme court accepted certification of the case from the court of appeals under Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 1-2(a)(7), because it was a subsequent appeal to a case then pending in this court. Roberts and Ya
In re Robin G.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT John M. Hunt, J. I The Commissioner of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS) has filed a permanency hearing petition pursuant to Family Court Act § 355.5 seeking a determination that the agency has exercised reasonable efforts to make it possible for the respondent to return to her home and for an order approving its proposed permanency plan
People v. Robin C.public domain
JUSTICE TURNER delivered the opinion of the court: In November 2007, a petition was filed for the emergency involuntary admission of respondent, Robin C., alleging she was mentally ill, reasonably expected to inflict serious physical harm upon herself or others, and unable to provide for her basic physical needs. In December 2007, the trial court conducted a hea
Roberts v. Yangpublic domain
285 S.W.3d 689 (2008) Christopher Wayne ROBERTS, Appellant, v. Robin Yanyan YANG (Formerly Roberts), Appellee. No. CA 07-1112. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. June 4, 2008. *690 Tripcony Law Firm, P.A., by James L. Tripcony, Little Rock, for appellant. No response. D.P. MARSHALL JR., Judge. Christopher Roberts
State v. Robertspublic domain
233 P.3d 324 (2010) 2010 MT 110 356 Mont. 290 STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Leonard Leroy ROBERTS, Defendant and Appellant. No. DA 09-0502. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs April 21, 2010. Decided May 18, 2010. *325 For Appellant: Robin A
961 F.2d 221 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. UN
Roberts v. American Bank & Trust Co.public domain
ORDER & REASONS ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge. Before the Court are three motions: a Motion to Dismiss Claims against American Bank & Trust Co. and Marian Kinchen *187Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1) (Rec. Doc. No. 7) filed by Defendants American Bank & Trust Co. and Marian Kinchen;
ROBIN J. v. Superior Courtpublic domain
21 Cal.Rptr.3d 417 (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 414 ROBIN J., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SUPERIOR COURT of San Diego County, Defendant and Respondent, Lucas J., a minor, etc. et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents, Department of Corrections, Real Party in Interest and Appellant. No. D044131. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. N
Bellassai v. Roberts Wesleyan Collegepublic domain
Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered August 22, 2007 in a personal injury action. The order and judgment granted the motions of defendant and third-party defendant for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintif
Roberts v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988). SHARP, W., THOMPSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.