Cases

HUGHES, Circuit Judge. Judith Miskill challenges an Arbitrator’s award sustaining her removal by the Social Security Administration for violations of the Agency’s- time and attendance policy. Because the Arbitrator’s decision is not in accordance with law, we vacate and remand. I Ms. Miskill was employed as an Information Tec

644 F.3d 931 (2011) Kenneth David ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-35512. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. *932 Submitted May 5, 2011.[*] Filed May 24, 2011. Tim Wilborn, Oregon City, OR, for the plaintiff-app

JUDGMENT Per Curiam This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

HUGHES, Circuit Judge. Mark Shapiro appeals the Merit Systems Protection Board’s finding of good cause to remove him from his position as an administrative law judge. Because the Board did not err in concluding that Mr. Shapiro’s production was dramatically lower than similarly situated ALJs, and that this failure to manage his caseload constitutes good cause for removal, we af

ORDER OF DISMISSAL JEROME B. SIMANDLE, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendant the Social Security Administration’s (hereinafter, the “SSA”) unopposed motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiffs Raymond and Aleeia Glenn’s (hereinafter, “Plaintiffs”) Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).1 [Docket Item 3.] For the re

PER CURIAM: Terrence Jacks appeals the district court’s order affirming the Administration Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, pursuant to *81642 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), respectively. On appeal, Jacks argues that substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s determination regardin

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

PER CURIAM: Joyce Hargress appeals the district court's decision affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405 (g), 1383(c)(3). On November 6, 2017, this

PER CURIAM: Joyce Hargress appeals the district court’s decision affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). After careful review, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND FACTS In May 2013,

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #12) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. #13) OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER, REVERSING COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT PRIOR TO APRIL 23, 2008, AND REMANDING THE CAPTIONED

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. This matter brought under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the denial of a claim for supplemental security income, was referred to Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson for a report and recommendation (“R & R”). In the R & R issue

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and Adjudged:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) ERNEST A. COST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-2226 (RWR) ) SOCIAL SECURITY ) ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defenda

770 F.Supp.2d 45 (2011) Ernest A. COST, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-2226 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 15, 2011. *47 Ernest A. Cost, pro se. Fred Elmore Haynes, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Defendant. MEMOR

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s orders remanding this' matter to the Commissioner and denying Turner’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible *218error. Acc

612 F.3d 960 (2010) Geraldine LANG, Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Appellee. No. 09-1927. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: February 11, 2010. Filed: July 15, 2010. *961 Robert J. Bruno, argued, Burnsville, MN, for appellant. Lonnie F. Bryan, AUSA, argued, Minneapoli

BLACK, Circuit Judge: Donnell Mitchell appeals the district court’s order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of his application for supplemental security income (SSI) and the Appeals Council’s decision denying his request for review. On appeal, Mitchell contends substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s credibility determination and that the Appeals Coun

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert J. Zani seeks to appeal the district court’s order transferring his action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert J. Zani seeks to appeal the district court’s order transferring his action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and