Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Dietrich Lamont Roberts (“plaintiff’) appeals from a decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“defendant”), denying his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title II of the Social Securi*446ty Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GEORGE C. HANKS, JR., United States Magistrate Judge. In this case seeking judicial review of a denial of Social Security benefits, Plaintiff Gail Whitmire Roberts (“Roberts”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in support.2 Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, filed his own Motion for Su

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2042 Doc: 42 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 48 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2042 SHELLEY C., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #12) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. #13) OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER, REVERSING COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT PRIOR TO APRIL 23, 2008, AND REMANDING THE CAPTIONED

DECISION AND ORDER HON. MICHAEL A. TELESCA, United States District Judge I. Introduction Represented by counsel, Diane B. Nasca (“plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to *293Titles II and XVI of the Social Security-Act (“the Act”), seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, United States District Judge ORDER AFFIRMING THE DENIAL OF BENEFITS This matter is before the Court on review of the Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff Robert C.T. Vine’s application for disability benefits. Jurisdiction is proper under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff raises three issues in his opening brief: (1) the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) faile

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge Plaintiff appeals from a denial of disability benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”). The action is one brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the Commissioner’s final determination. On January 9, 2014, plaintiff, then twenty-six years old, filed an application for a period of disa

ORDER CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Upon careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation filed September 29, 2016, and hearing no objections from the Defendant, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and ACCEPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that [9] Plaintiffs Motion

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Robert J. Quinn, Jr. (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) and seeks review of the final decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), denying Plaintiffs application for disability benefits. (Dkt. 1). Plai

DECISION AND ORDER REVERSING THE COMMISSIONER’S DENIAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY BENEFITS AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PAMELA PEPPER, United States District Judge Plaintiff John Anderson seeks judicial review of the final decision of the acting Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), who found that Anderson was not “disabled” within the meaning of the Social Security Act. The Social S

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff appeals from a denial of disability benefits by the. Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”). The action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) of the Social Security Act (“Act”), to review the final decision of the Commissioner. On January 24, 2011, pla

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT Danny C. Reeves, United States District Judge These matters are pending for consideration of Defendant Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security’s, motions to dismiss in part. Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Notices entered in each case, the motions to dismiss in part were converted to motions for summary

OPINION AND ORDER McSHANE, District Judge: Plaintiff Francia M. Gartzke brings this action for judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision denying her application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. This Court has jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3). Gartzke, now ,48 years old, alleges she became disabled on April 1, 2003

WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge: This is a review of a denial of Social Security Disability (“SSD”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) by Carolyn W. Colvin, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”). Plaintiff Kimmey Wright (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner

ORDER Neil V. Wake, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Robert I. Grim seeks review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), which denied him disability insurance benefits under sections 216(i)' and 223(d) of the Social Security Act. Because the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) is not supported by substantial evidenc

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER REVERSING THE COMMISSIONER’S DECISION (Docket No. 17) AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ORDER AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER (Docket No. 20) HILLMAN, District Judge. This is an action for judicial review of a final decision by the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the

MEMORANDUM OPINION GEORGE J. HAZEL, District Judge. Plaintiffs bring this case against Carolyn W. Colvin, the acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “SSA”). Plaintiffs present several allegations of constitutional and statutory violations stemming from the SSA’s taking of a portion of Plaintiffs’ tax refunds to satisfy overpayments the SSA determined it had made to Plain

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [# 24] AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT]# 25] GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On November 1, 2012, Robert Karlik (“Plaintiff’) filed the instant action against his former employer, the Social Security Administration (“Defendant”), raising claims under the Re

ORDER NEIL V. WAKE, District Judge. On February 21, 2013, Plaintiff Robert G. Dyer initiated this action, seeking review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), which denied him disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under sections 216®, 223(d), and 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff, now deceased,

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Robert Edward Delgado (“plaintiff’) appeals from a decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“defendant”), denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-434. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S