Cases

ORDER ■ DAVID G. GUADERRAMA, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Respondent Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ (“the government” or “ATF”) “Motion for Summary Judgment” (“Motion”) (ECF No. 9), filed on October 7, 2014. After due consideration of the Motion, the parties’ filings, and the applicable law, the Court enters the following Order. I. BACK

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part, and plaintiffs motion will be denied.

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was presented to the court, and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded full consideration to the issues presented on appeal and has determined they do not warrant a published opinion. For the reasons stated in Firearms Import/Export Roundtable Trade Group v. Jones, 854 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C.2012), it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRANK EUGENE LAMB, III, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3036 (TJK) BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Frank Eugene Lamb, III, has, for the second time, sued the Department of Home- land

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID CODREA, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 21-2201 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 8 : BUREAU O

PER CURIAM: David E. Henderson appeals the district court’s order granting his request to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissing this case as patently frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Henderson v. Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco & Explosives,

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge The plaintiff, David T. Hardy, a self-described “attorney and internet blogger who disseminates information relating to firearms law issues,” Compl. ¶ 4, ECF No. 2, initiated this lawsuit against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”), the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and DOJ’s Offi

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge. Appellants Tripoli Rocketry Association and National Association of Rocketry are non-profit organizations whose members are hobby rocket enthusiasts. They challenge the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives’ (“ATFE”) refusal to alter its classification of ammonium perchlorate composite propellant (“APCP”

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge . Shedd wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge Wilkins and Judge Niemeyer joined. SHEDD, Circuit Judge: In February 2000, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (the Bureau) 1 sent letters to approximately 450 federally licensed firearms dea

MEMORANDUM OPINION PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge. Pro se Plaintiff Daniel Ross filed this suit against the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (“ATF”), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), and individual officers of both agencies (collectively “Defendants”), alleging various constitutional, employment discrimination, and state tort causes of action, as w

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge Zeyad Abdeljabbar, the pro se plaintiff in this civil matter, alleges that the defendants, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (“ATF”), the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (“EOUSA”), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), violated the Fre

PRADO, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(1) and (c)(1), and attendant regulations, which prohibit federally licensed firearms dealers from selling handguns to persons under the age of 21. Appellants — the National Rifle Association and individuals who at the time of filing were over the age of 18 but under the age of 21 — -brought suit

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Firearms Import/Export Roundtable Trade Group (“FAIR”) and Timothy Bero, the president of North West Imports (collectively, “plaintiffs”) 1 bring this action against the Bureau of Al

Cordy, J. Jay E. Simkin, a New Hampshire resident, held a temporary nonresident Class A unrestricted license to carry firearms in Massachusetts (license). Following an incident that occurred on November 6, 2009, the firearms records bureau2 *169(bureau) revoked Simkin’s license, deeming him no longer a “suitable person” to possess it. A judge

[Cite as Buckeye Firearms Found., Inc. v. Cincinnati, 2020-Ohio-5422.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO BUCKEYE FIREARMS FOUNDATION : APPEAL NO. C-190569 INC., TRIAL NO. A-1803098 : OHIOANS FOR CONCEALED CARRY, :

PALMER, J. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY...273 II. ALLEGED FACTS...275 III. NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT...278 IV. WRONGFUL DEATH AND CUTPA: ISSUES OF STATE LAW...283 A. CUTPA Standing ...285 B. Statute of Limitation

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3230 ___________________________ Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc.; State of West Virginia; State of North Dakota; State of Alabama; State of Alaska; State of Arkansas; State of Florida; State of Georgia; State of Idaho; State of Indiana; State of Iowa; State

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge Kenneth J. Dillon, the plaintiff in this civil matter, alleges that the defendant, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), violated the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2012), by failing to respond adequately to two FOIA document requests submitted by the plaintiff