Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Roberto Rodriguez and Noemi Rodriguez”
Romeo Longoria v. Exxon Mobil Corporationpublic domain
ACCEPTED Electronically Filed 04-15-00536-CV 8/11/2015 5:15:49 PM FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS Noe Guerra Jr., District Clerk SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ELEANOR ABRAHAM, ET AL., CASE NO. SX-11-CV-0000550 Plaintiffs, ACTION FOR: DAMAGES vs. ST. CROIX RENAISSANCE GROUP, LLLP, Defendant. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO: JUDGES AND MAGISTRATE JUDGES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT LEE J. ROHN, ESQ. JOEL H. HOLT, ESQ. CARL J. HARTMANN III, ESQ. IT/LAW CLERKS/LAW LIBRARY ORDER BOOK PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 03, 2020 a(n) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dated Fe
RamiroAviles v. S&P Global, Inc.public domain
J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge *246In these five related cases, one of which is a putative derivative and class action, a collective total of over 500 offshore investors ("Plaintiffs") who acquired shares in the Lifetrade Fund, B.V. ("Lifetrade") and two related funds (collectively, the "Lifetrade Funds") seek relief for the evaporation of their investmen
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under