Cases

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CARLO G. CHIARELLA, Appellant, v. ROBERTA A. FORD, Appellee. No. 4D2022-2874 [February 21, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach

This is the second time these parties have been before this court. This court has explained the procedural history and facts of this dispute as follows: "The North Alabama Skills Training Consortium, the Central Alabama Skills Training Consortium, and the South Alabama Skills Training Consortium (collectively `the Consortia') appeal from the denial of their petition for a writ of certiorari. The evidence and record on appeal reveal the following. "I. Pr

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 311 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 312 The North Alabama Skills Training Consortium, the Central Alabama Skills Training Consortium, and the South Alabama Skill

666 S.E.2d 153 (2008) Cecelia L. FORD, Administrator of the Estate of Willie Lee Ford, Jr., deceased, Plaintiff, v. Trent W. McCAIN, M.D., Forsyth Medical Center, Inc., and Novant Health, Inc., Defendants. No. COA07-2. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 16, 2008. *154 Robert E. Probst, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appe

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 21) AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 29) JANET C. HALL, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Pro se plaintiffs Crystal McFarlane and her minor children, S.M., J.M., and N.H. (together “Ms. McFarlane”) bring this action against the State of Connecticut Department of Children and Families (“DCF”) and DCF soci

CHEHARDY, C.J. *661Plaintiff, SEC Resources, L.L.C., appeals the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court's October 19, 2017 judgment granting a preliminary injunction enjoining the judicial sale of property. For the reasons that follow, we affirm this judgment. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On N

Hull, J. The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly instructed the jury concerning the allocation of burdens of proof in an action brought by an employee pursuant to General Statutes § 31-290a,1 alleging wrongful termination of employ*42ment. The plaintiff, Roberta Ford, instituted this action pursuant to § 31-290a,

177 F.Supp.2d 660 (2001) FORD MOTOR CO., et al, Plaintiffs, v. GREATDOMAINS.COM, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-71544-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 20, 2001. Kathleen Lang, John E. S. Scott, Dickinson Wright, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiffs. Susan N. McFee, Ford Global Technologies, Inc., Dearborn, MI, Gregory P

200 Mich. App. 190 (1993) 503 N.W.2d 912 STOPCZYNSKI v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY Docket No. 132931. Michigan Court of Appeals. Submitted December 9, 1992, at Detroit. Decided March 24, 1993. Approved for publication June 17, 1993, at 9:10 A.M. Roberta Kyselka Sarkis, for the plaintiff. James C. Cur

OPINION JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice Charles Dwayne Lankford and Roberta Gresham seek mandamus relief from the trial court’s May 12, 2015 orders overruling their pleas to the jurisdiction and Lankford’s motion to dismiss, and designating Stephanie Smith as a joint managing conservator of T.D.L.

177 F.Supp.2d 628 (2001) FORD MOTOR CO., et al, Plaintiffs, v. GREATDOMAINS.COM, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-71544-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 20, 2001. *629 *630 *631 Kathleen Lang, John E.S. Scott,

177 F.Supp.2d 656 (2001) FORD MOTOR CO., et al, Plaintiffs, v. GREATDOMAINS.COM, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-71544-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 20, 2001. Kathleen Lang, John E. S. Scott, Dickinson Wright, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiffs. Susan N. McFee, Ford Global Technologies, Inc., Dearborn, MI, Gregory P

177 F.Supp.2d 635 (2001) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GREATDOMAINS.COM, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-71544-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 20, 2001. *636 *637 *638

141 F.Supp.2d 763 (2001) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GREAT DOMAINS, INC. et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-71544-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. March 30, 2001. *764 *765 *766 *767

767 S.W.2d 851 (1989) Frederick C. FORD, a/k/a Fred Ford and Roberta Ford, Appellants, v. Danny DARWIN, Appellee. No. 05-87-01310-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. March 8, 1989. Rehearing Denied April 11, 1989. *852 Howard V. Tygrett, Jr., Dallas, for appellants. Louis H. Altman, Baskin & Novakov

3 Cal.4th 339 (1992) 834 P.2d 724 11 Cal. Rptr.2d 30 LARRY C. FORD, Plaintiff and Appellant v. JACK GOUIN, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. S014828. Supreme Court of California. August 24, 1992. *341 COUNSEL Eric D. Carlyle for Plaintiff and Appellant.

JACHARLES R. JONES, Judge. This matter is before us from the district court’s ruling in favor of defendant which granted their Motion to Rescind the court’s prior order permitting the filing of an amended class action. The court’s ruling dismissed the plaintiffs class action claim. We reverse. FACTS The facts of this case have been widely reported. See Ford v. Murphy Oil,

177 B.R. 374 (1994) In re FLORIDA BAY TRADING COMPANY, Debtor. Buddy FORD, Chapter 7 Trustee for Florida Bay Trading Company, Plaintiff, v. Neil Turk FELDMAN, M.D., P.A., Defined Benefit Pension Plan and Neil Turk Feldman, as Trustee of the Neil Turk Feldman, M.D., P.A., Defined Benefit Pension Plan, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 92-834-8P7. Adv. No. 92-372. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florid

759 N.E.2d 28 (2001) 325 Ill. App.3d 1058 259 Ill.Dec. 548 Roberta and Harold SELDIN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Donald BABENDIR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-00-0069. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. October 12, 2001. Rehearing Denied November 8, 2001.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00761-CV Jimmie Luecke Children Partnership, Ltd., Appellant v. Everard Droemer, Dorchen Hoeinghaus, Bernard Droemer, Theodore Droemer, and Roberta Boriack, Appellees FROM THE 335TH DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY NO. 1146-335, JUDGE JOHN M. DELANEY