Cases

PER CURIAM: Roderick Jerome English appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. English v. Khan, l:13-cv-02857-JFA, 2014 WL 1330114 (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument b

146 B.R. 874 (1992) In re John Q. ENGLISH, Jr., Tamera M. McIntosh English, Debtors. Arlene R. ENGLISH, Plaintiff, v. John Q. ENGLISH, Jr., Tamera M. McIntosh English, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 92-30691-BKC-RAM, Adv. No. 92-0601-BKC-RAM-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. October 28, 1992. Donald Loughran, Coral Springs, Fla., for debtors, defendan

826 F.2d 1068 English (Forrest G.), Owens (Robert M.)v.Siddens (Donald) NO. 86-1193 United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. JUL 31, 1987 1 Appeal From: C.D.Ill. 2

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 17-2083 LARRY E. ENGLISH, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT L. WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

Affirmed as Reformed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 20, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00420-CR NO. 14-12-00421-CR FLORENTINO ROBERT ENGLISH, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 252nd District C

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Forrest ,G. English and Robert M. Owens 1 appeal from an order dismissing their claim that Mr. English was discharged from his union without proper procedural protections, in violation of section 101(a)(5) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. § 411(a)(5). They cont

751 F.Supp. 1343 (1990) Forrest G. ENGLISH and Robert M. Owens, Plaintiffs, v. Donald SIDDENS, et al., Defendants. Nos. 79-3022, 84-3271 and 84-3299. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. November 30, 1990. *1344 Forrest Gene English, Robert M. Owens, Springfield, Ill., for plaintiffs. Michael

2023 IL 128077 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 128077) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. JOHNNY ENGLISH, Appellant. Opinion filed June 15, 2023. JUSTICE NEV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-518 Filed: 16 June 2020 Wake County, Nos. 17 CRS 221499, 221501 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. QUINTON DANTE ENGLISH Appeal by Defendant from judgments entered 21 December 2018 by Judge Rebecca W. Holt in Wake County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 26 May 2020. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assistant Attorney

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-518 Filed: 16 June 2020 Wake County, Nos. 17 CRS 221499, 221501 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. QUINTON DANTE ENGLISH Appeal by Defendant from judgments entered 21 December 2018 by Judge Rebecca W. Holt in Wake County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 26 May 2020. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assistant Attorney

ORDER MILLS, District Judge: I. Background This litigation has festered in this Court for over eight years. In one form or another it has consumed the time and resources of three district judges and one United States Magistrate of this Court. It has also been subject to orders from visiting judges of other districts. At one time there were as many as five s

MINER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant English Electric Valve Co., Ltd. (“EEV”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York *85(Lasker, J.), after a non-jury trial, in favor of defendant-appellee Westwood Shipping Lines (“Westwood”). Judge Lasker ruled that EEV failed to establish a prima facie case unde

72 Ill. App.3d 736 (1979) 393 N.E.2d 18 JORJA M. ENGLISH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. JAMI D. ENGLISH, Respondent-Appellee. No. 78-1635. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division). Opinion filed May 29, 1979. Rehearing denied July 2, 1979. *737 Arthur H. Grant, of Arthur H. Gran

Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1312Defendant Timothy Andre English pled guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At his sentencing, the court g

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1788 Doc: 50 Filed: 01/05/2024 Pg: 1 of 23 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1788 KEWON ENGLISH, Plaintiff – Appellant, and EARL POWELL, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH CLARKE; LEON LOTT,

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

PER CURIAM. Taxpayer/petitioner Robert M. Brown is one of approximately 230 professional hockey players who, in 1975, received deficiency notices from the IRS for deductions for off-season expenses claimed in their 1972 income tax returns. In an effort to resolve these cases expeditiously, the Tax Court directed counsel and the Commissioner to designate two representative cases

DECISION LEWIS, Judge: Pursuant to his pleas the appellant was found guilty of forgery in violation of Article 123, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C.A. § 923, and six specifications of uttering worthless checks in violation of Article 123a, U.C. M.J., 10 U.S.C.A. § 923a. A military judge, sitting alone, imposed a sentence including a bad conduct discharge, confinement for two years and reduction to airman basic. This sent

JUSTICE ROBERT E. GORDON delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Presiding Justice Garcia and Justice Cahill concurred in the judgment and opinion. OPINION In this appeal, defendant Anthony English contests the dismissal of his postconviction

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00219-CV LMP Austin English Aire, LLC, derivatively through Lafayette English Partner, LLC, (individually and derivatively) through Lafayette English Apartments, LP, Appellants v. Lafayette English Apartments, LP (Nominal Defendant); Lafayette English GP, LLC; HVC English, LLC; HVC Lafayette, LLC; Scott Schaeffer; Austin Lafayett