Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John Z. Lee, United States District Judge Robert J. Meier filed for individual bankruptcy under Chapter 11 in 2014. He then converted his case to a case under Chapter 7, which raised the question of whether the money Meier had earned after the commencement of the proceedings belonged to him or the Chapter 7 estate. A creditor filed a motion, which was joined by the Chapter 7 trus

147 P.3d 86 (2006) Robert A. FLOOD and Katherine A. Flood, husband and wife, David Spiker, a single man, John Spiker, a single man, and William L. Peterson, a single man, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Irwin A. KATZ, Defendant-Appellant, and M.K. Miller and N.E. Miller, husband and wife, Jane Doe Katz, Bryan D. Miller and Jane Doe Miller, husband and wife, Barry Gill and Jane Doe Gill, husband and wife, International Basic Resources, Inc., an Ida

226 Wis.2d 798 (1999) 595 N.W.2d 345 Jay W. SMITH and Debra J. Smith, Plaintiffs, WEST BEND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Paul KATZ, d/b/a Underroof Building and Design and Robert L. Reisinger, Jr., Defendants, Philip A. GIUFFRE, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, David A. and Mary A. STAWSKI, Third-Party Defendants. No. 96-1998.

218 Wis.2d 442 (1998) 578 N.W.2d 202 Jay W. SMITH and Debra J. Smith, Plaintiffs, WEST BEND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Paul KATZ, d/b/a Underroof Building and Design and Robert L. Reisinger, Jr., Defendants, Philip A. GIUFFRE, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, David A. and Mary A. STAWSKI, Third-Party Defendants. No. 96-1998.

Alford v Katz (2022 NY Slip Op 05397) Alford v Katz 2022 NY Slip Op 05397 Decided on September 30, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Order entered January 19, 2000 affirmed, with $10 costs. By agreement of the parties in 1987, as memorialized in a consent judgment entered in Supreme Court, New York County, the apartment premises were exempted from rent stabilization “by virtue of the fact that the apartment is not and will not be occupied by [tenant] as his primary residence.” It is not

934 F.Supp. 79 (1995) Lenore GORDON and Robert Martin, Plaintiffs, v. Ascher KATZ, individually and as Town Justice and Commissioner/Administrator of the Justice Court of the Town of Greenburgh, Paul Feiner, individually and as Supervisor of the Town of Greenburgh, Lester Adler, individually and as Councilperson of the Town of Greenburgh, Patrick Pilla, individually and as former Councilperson of the Town of Greenburgh, Diana Juettner, individual

Per Curiam Opinion; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge THOMAS. PER CURIAM: I. INTRODUCTION Robert A. Hood, Warden of the Federal Correctional Institution, Sheridan, Oregon, appeals the district court’s grant of habeas corpus relief, 28 U.S.C. § 2241, to a number of prisoners.2 Eac

WINTER, Circuit Judge: This appeal is from the dismissal of a complaint brought by Harry Katz pro se on behalf of himself and all other stockholders in a cooperative building subsidized by New York City and organized under the New York Private Housing Finance Law (“Housing Law”). Katz charges that the building’s board of directors and the other *206defendants

796 F.Supp. 1054 (1992) Howard TREIBER, Paul S. Schulman, M.D., Ralph S. Jackson, John & Dianne Wisenbaker, Maynard King, Charles E. Morgan, A. George Ventro and Paul E. Bengston, Plaintiffs, v. Phyllis A. KATZ, Cigna Securities, Inc., ARP Timers I, Inc., American Residential Management, Inc., American Residential Properties, Inc., American Residential Securities, Inc., Defendants. No. 91-CV-70374-DT.

897 F.Supp. 1106 (1995) Moise KATZ, Plaintiff, v. HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL, INC., Donald C. Clark, and Edwin P. Hoffman, Defendants. No. 91 C 7280. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 24, 1995. *1107 *1108 Robert D. Allison, Chicago, IL, Jules Brody, Stull, Stu

Matter of Katz v Town of Hempstead (2025 NY Slip Op 00659) Matter of Katz v Town of Hempstead 2025 NY Slip Op 00659 Decided on February 5, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

892 F.2d 20 Harry Theodore KATZ, Appellant,v.Robert MORGENTHAU, Harold Wilson, Sandra Gabrilove, PaulGiddins, Joseph Hardiman, Daniel McKenna, JosephCannizzarro, Joan Steproe, the City of New York, DanielShapiro, Paul Roth, Schulte, Roth & Zabel, Federation ofJewish Philanthropies of New York, Joyce Dubensky, WilliamKahn, Marilyn Lipman, United Jewish Appeal, Inc., AnitaSarno, Associated YM-YWHAs of Greater New Y

709 F.Supp. 1219 (1989) Harry Theodore KATZ, Plaintiff, v. Robert M. MORGENTHAU, Harold Wilson, Sandra Gabrilove, Paul Giddins, Joseph Hardiman, Daniel McKenna, Joseph Cannizzarro, Joan Steproe, the City of New York, Daniel Shapiro, Paul Roth, Schulte, Roth & Zabel, Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, Joyce Dubensky, William Kahn, Marilyn Lipman, United Jewish Appeal, Inc., Anita Sarno, Associated YM-YMHAs of Greater New York, In

902 F.2d 204 Harry Theodore KATZ, and all others similarly situated,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Robert KLEHAMMER, Ruth Lerner, New York City Department ofHousing Preservation and Development, Paul Crotty, AnthonyGliedman, Abraham Biderman, Alfred Siegel, Edward Koch, Cityof New York, Robert Seavey, Irwin Fingerit, Bernard Vogel,Robert Oziel, Charles Skoller, Solomon Liss, Eric Schultz,Seavey Fingerit Vogel Oziel & Sk

PER CURIAM: Harry Katz, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Constance Baker Motley, Judge, granting summary judgment dismissing his action alleging various civil rights violations on the part of twenty-three separate defendants. We reverse the grant of summary judgment as to Katz’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982) claim arising out of an allegedly illegal search,

774 F.Supp. 121 (1991) Moise KATZ, Bernice Berger, Barnett Stepak, Gary Goldberg, Joel Blake, Steven Verkouteren, Bruce Doniger, Diversified Imaging Supply Corporation, Joseph E. Kovacs, Phyllis Freiman, Maria Figueroa, Larry Neuman, and Olga Fried, Plaintiffs, v. Donald A. PELS, Leland S. Brown, William G. Herbster, Wilma H. Jordan, Richard W. Kislik, Thos. H. Law, and David M. Naseman, Defendants, and LIN Broadcasting Corp., Nominal Def

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge. When Sears, Roebuck & Co. merged with Kmart Corp. in 2005, the holding company formed as the parent (Sears for short) inherited directors from both businesses. This suit concerns two of them: William C. Crowley and Ann N. Reese. Crowley also serves on the boards of Auto-Nation, Inc., and AutoZone, Inc., and Reese on the board of Jones Apparel Group,

ON REHEARING EN BANC BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. Defendants Christopher Paul Cusumano and Robert William Porco entered conditional pleas of guilty to manufacturing marijuana, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and reserved their right to appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to suppress. The district court sentenced each Defendant to thirty-months imprisonment. On appeal, Defendants contend that the affidavit

326 F.Supp.2d 1060 (2003) VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., a California Limited Partnership, Defendant. No. 01-CV-09871 RGK(RCX). United States District Court, C.D. California. June 23, 2003. *1061 *1062