Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DAVID F. EVANS; COLLIN FINNERTY;  READE SELIGMANN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STEVEN W. CHALMERS; BEVERLY COUNCIL; RONALD HODGE; JEFF LAMB; MICHAEL RIPBERGER; LEE RUSS; PATRICK BAKER, Defendants-Appellants,  No. 11-1436 and CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA; MARK GOTTLIEB; BENJAMIN HIMAN; DAVID ADDISON; MICHAEL NIFONG; LINWOOD WIL

Pursuant to a decree of divorce rendered in the matter of the marriage of Kenneth Gillespie and Lois Marie Gillespie and in the interest of their minor child, Sarah Marie, the father was appointed managing conservator of the child. Trial was to the court. This appeal concerns the custody award. On the sole point of error assigned, the court of appeals, with one justice dissenting, determined that certain hospital records containing references to Mrs. Gillespie's treatment for alcoholi

The opinion of the court was delivered by McFarland, J.: This is an action by beneficiaries of a trust for recovery of damages for oil and gas investments made by the Trust. The case before us was determined in a bench trial and involves a very complex factual situation as witnessed by the trial court’s entry of over 200 findings of fact. A highly summarized statement of the facts is as fol

14 Kan. App. 2d 563 (1990) 796 P.2d 1060 WARREN BROWN GILLESPIE and POLLY GILLESPIE TOWNSEND, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. DOROTHEA WOFFORD SEYMOUR, as Co-trustee of the Brown-Gillespie Trust Estate, et al., Defendants, and ROBERT W. BURDGE and GRANT-THORNTON, An Accounting Partnership, Defendants/Appellees. No. 63,791 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion fi

773 F.Supp. 1154 (1991) UNITED STATES of America v. Thomas P. GILLESPIE, Jr. No. HCR 90-89. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. April 25, 1991. *1155 Patrick Hansen, Asst. U.S. Atty., Dyer, Ind., for plaintiff. Robert L. Lewis and Hilbert Bradley, Gary, Ind., for defendant. OPINION

715 S.E.2d 832 (2011) 311 Ga. App. 442 GILLESPIE v. The STATE. No. A11A1040. Court of Appeals of Georgia. August 17, 2011. *833 David Gillespie, pro se. Patrick H. Head, Dist. Atty., Samuel Kevin Barger, John Richard Edwards, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellee. PHIPPS, Presiding Judge. D

FLÁUM, Circuit Judge. In October 1988, Tom P. Gillespie, Jr., honored a government subpoena by testifying before and presenting documents to a federal grand jury investigating improprieties surrounding certain contracts entered into by the City of Gary, Indiana. The inquiry focused primarily on the city’s relationship with Inner City Leasing and Trucking Company and Gillespie’s

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves eight challenges to the district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines. We reject all claims lodged against the district court’s application of the guidelines except for the challenge to the upward departure. Finding the departure impermissible, we vacate and remand with instructions. I. FACTS AND PR

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. Gillespie, 2012 IL App (4th) 110151 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption DEWAYNE L. GILLESPIE, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. Fourth District Docket No. 4-11-0151 Filed August 29, 2012 Held

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc STATE OF MISSOURI, ) Opinion issued April 30, 2024 ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SC100170 ) ROBERT A. WOOLERY, )

634 F.Supp.2d 490 (2007) FREEDOM MEDICAL INC. v. Thomas R. GILLESPIE, III, et al. Civil Action No. 06-3195. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 29, 2007. *495 Edward T. Kang, Oliver D. Griffin, Melissa A. Lebon, Weir & Partners LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Gregory H. Mathews, Law Offices of Gregory Mathews, West

NO. 12-13-00097-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS PATRICK KITTMAN, § APPEAL FROM THE 273RD APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT HOLLY KAY MILLER, APPELLEE § SABINE COUNTY, TEXAS

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge. Plaintiffs Frankie Washington (“Washington”) and Frankie Washington, Jr. (“Washington, Jr.”) and defendant Patrick Baker (“Baker”), appeal from interlocutory orders entered by Judge W. Osmond Smith III on 6 November 2012 in Durham County Superior Court. Plaintiffs appeal from orders granting nine of twelve defendants’ motions to dismiss for insufficient service of process and denying plaintiffs’ moti

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge. Frankie Washington (“Washington”) and Frankie Washington, Jr. (“Washington, Jr.”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) and defendant Patrick Baker (“Baker”) appeal from interlocutory orders entered by Judge W. Osmond Smith, III on 6 November 2012 in Durham County Superior Court. Plaintiffs appeal from orders granting nine of twelve defendants’

Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court. This is an appeal from a decree of the Superior Court of Cook county, entered March 22, 1907, which declared and adjudged a lien to exist on lot six and the south half of lot five in block four in Walter S. Dray’s Addition to Park Manor, etc., otherwise described as 7108 Vernon avenue in the city of Chicago,

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, alleging breach of employee confidentiality agreement, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, tortious interference with contract, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and civil conspiracy, and seeking compensatory and injunctive relief against a former employee

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, alleging. breach of employee confidentiality agreement, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, tortious interference with contract, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and civil conspiracy, and seeking compensatory and injunctive relief against a former employee

621 F.Supp.2d 18 (2009) John CREEDEN, Plaintiff, v. Perry SANIEOFF, Harold Simansky and Linda Simansky, Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-11149-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 15, 2009. *19 Paul J. Gillespie, Robert J. Gizmunt, Gillespie & Associates Lynnfield, MA, Ronald E. Harding Weston, Patrick, Wil

Rehearing En Banc Granted; Opinion of September 19, 2002 Vacated; Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Remanded in Part; En Ba Rehearing En Banc Granted; Opinion of September 19, 2002 Vacated; Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Remanded in Part; En Banc Plurality and Dissenting Opinions filed July 10, 2003.

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity Illinois Official Reports