Cases

Appellee Harvey Heagy, plaintiff in the Court below, brought suit against appellant Texas State Hotel, Inc., alleging wrongful eviction, breach of contract under Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5236 (Vernon 1962) and alternatively alleging discrimination under Tex.Hum.Res Code Ann. § 121.003 (Vernon 1980). Trial was had to the court without a jury. The court found, inter alia, (1) defendant was a public facility (2) plaintiff rented a room from d

528 F.2d 549 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Richard Glynn BYRD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 73--1426 Summary Calendar. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Feb. 25, 1976. Warren Heagy, Odessa, Tex., for defendant-appellant. Anthony J. P. Farris, U.S. Atty., Rob

PER CURIAM: On September 7, 1973, the conviction of Richard Glynn Byrd was reversed. 483 F.2d 1196. Because the court based its opinion in part on Almeida-Sanchez, 1 which was subsequently determined to have prospective application

INGRAHAM, Circuit Judge; Appellant Richard Glynn Byrd was convicted in a non jury trial of possessing with intent to distribute 300 pounds of marijuana 1 and of carrying a firearm while committing this felony. 2 B

PER CURIAM: We grant appellee’s petition for rehearing. In United States v. Miller, 492 F.2d 37 (5th Cir., 1974), the court held that Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 1973, 413 U.S. 266, 93 S.Ct. 2535, 37 L.Ed.2d 596, should be given only prospective application. We therefore abandon any reliance upon Almeida-Sanchez.

961 N.E.2d 495 (2011) Oscar B. DUMONT, Appellant-Respondent, v. Michelle D. DUMONT, Appellee-Petitioner. No. 17A05-1104-CR-195. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 22, 2011. Ordered Published January 12, 2012. *496 W. Erik Weber, Mefford Weber & Blythe, Auburn, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Robert J. H

PETERSON, Judge. Robert and Sheila Policari, plaintiffs in an automobile personal injury action, appeal a judgment for the defense. They contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion for mistrial. Their motion was made when it was learned that, on the day jury deliberations were to begin, all members of the jury except the alternate had seen a newspaper article which stated that the Poli-caris’ medical witness

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DOMENIC P. DISTEFANO and ) DEBRA DISTEFANO ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Vv. ) ) KW SOLAR SOLUTIONS, INC., ) C.A. No. N16C-11-015 CLS and DALE WOLF, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Date Submitted: March 15, 2019 Date Decided: June 27, 2019 Upon Defendants KW Solar Solutions, Inc., and Dale Wolf’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Expert DENIED. Blake A. Bennett, Esquire, Christopher H. Lee, Esquire, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware, Attorney for Plainti

99 Md. App. 251 (1994) 636 A.2d 496 FREDERICK WARD ASSOCIATES, INC., v. VENTURE, INC., ET AL. No. 755, September Term, 1993. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. January 31, 1994. Robert F. Kahoe, Jr., Bel Air, for appellant. Dwight E. Thomey (Baker, Thomey & Emrey, P.A., on the brief), Elkton, for appellees. Argued before

OPINION HERLIHY, J. On the eve of trial the Court has been asked to exclude certain defense evidence relating to the force of impact between plaintiffs’ car and defendant Joseph Leot-ta’s tractor trailer truck; the goal of that to undercut plaintiffs’ injuries claim. Plaintiff Milton Frazier was driving with plaintiff Andrew Clemmons as a passenger. They were crossing the Delaware Memorial B

19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY

596 S.W.2d 502 (1979) Betty CORONADO, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYERS' NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Respondent. No. B-8334. Supreme Court of Texas. December 12, 1979. Rehearing Denied February 6, 1980. *503 Alex Gonzalez, Fort Stockton, Warren K. Heagy, Odessa, for petitioner. Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe, Morrow

167 Ill. App.3d 1081 (1988) 522 N.E.2d 146 EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, Special Adm'r of the Estate of Regina Heagy, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AIR ILLINOIS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 86-3530. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division). Opinion filed March 8, 1988. *1082

745 A.2d 419 (2000) 357 Md. 450 Gary W. WAICKER et al. v. Fabio K. BANEGURA et al. No. 48, Sept. Term, 1999. Court of Appeals of Maryland. February 9, 2000. *421 Donald P. Mazor, Baltimore, for appellants. Edward J. Gilliss (Edward U. Lee, III, Royston, Mueller, McLean & Reid, LLP, on brief), To

SHUGHART, P.J., Plaintiffs have brought this action in assumpsit alleging a breach of an implied warranty of habitability. Defendants’ preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, a motion for a more specific complaint, and a motion to strike are before us. The initial question is whether plaintiffs’ complaint states a cause of action. The pleaded facts, admitted for the purposes of this motio

AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves review of the district court’s order granting appellees’ motion to suppress evidence derived from a search of the car in which they were riding. Appel-lees Jimmy Petty and Joe Nunez-Quintela were indicted for possession of a quantity of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1103 KENNETH ACKERMAN; JAMES ACKERMAN; APRIL ACKERMAN; MARY ACKERMAN, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Ackerman; CHARLES V. ADAMS; CHRISTIANNE M. ADAMS; JOHN ALEXIS; CHARLES J. ARKINS; LULA M. ARKINS; THOMAS J. ARNO; AMY H. ARNO, Both individually and as next friends of A.A. and E.A.; R

Opinion of the Court Quinn, Chief Judge: Before a general court-martial in Okinawa, the accused pleaded guilty to unpremeditated murder of a civilian, in violation of Article 118, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 918. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for twenty years and accessory penalties. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement with the accused, the convening auth

OPINION FUTEY, Judge. This action is before the court on plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and defendant’s motion for partial dismissal and cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, a retired Deputy United States Marshal, seeks judgment against defendant *195in the form of a court order declaring illegal defendant’s refusal to calculate pl

837 A.2d 1231 (2003) In re: A.R.M.F. and M.B.F., Minor Children Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights of C.D.F., Natural Mother and H.E.F., Natural Father Appeal of: C.D.F., Natural Mother and H.E.F., Natural Father Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 11, 2003. Filed December 2, 2003. *1232 Brad M. Jackson, Doyl