⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Robert L. Willems”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011-06-16 · Published · cited 0× · 644 F.3d 259
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: Shortly after the renowned patriarch of a family-owned oil and gas drilling business passed away, the business began to suffer financial reverses, and the family began to squabble. A potential sale of the business was thwarted when one of the adult children filed suit against her mother and siblings. Amid legal trouble and a severe cash shortage, the company finally found refuge in a prepackage
Montana Supreme Court · 2014-03-26 · Published · cited 1× · 2014 MT 82; 374 Mont. 343; 2014 WL 1234120; 325 P.3d 1204; 2014 Mont. LEXIS 164
March 26 2014 DA 13-0820 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2014 MT 82 ROBERT WILLEMS, PHYLLIS WILLEMS, TOM BENNETT, BILL JONES, PHILIP WILSMAN, LINDA WILSMAN, JASON CARLSON, MICK JIMMERSON, DWAYNE CROOK, MARY JO CROOK, JAMES STUNTZ, RANDY BOLING, ROD BOLING, BOB KELLER, GLORIA KELLER, RONALD TORGESON, RUT
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011-06-16 · Published · cited 17× · 644 F.3d 259; 2011 WL 2410498
644 F.3d 259 (2011) In the Matter of: DAVIS OFFSHORE, L.P.; Davis Petroleum Pipeline, L.L.C.; Davis Petroleum Corporation; Davis Offshore Holdings, L.L.C., Debtors. Evercore Capital Partners II, L.L.C.; Gregg Davis; Red Mountain Capital Partners, L.L.C.; Willem Mesdag; Sankaty Advisors, L.L.C., Appellees, v. Nancy Sue Davis Trust, Appellant. No. 09-41294. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circu
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2024-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Beales, Huff, O’Brien, AtLee, Malveaux, Athey, Fulton, Ortiz, PUBLISHED Causey, Friedman, Chaney, Raphael, Lorish, Callins and White Argued at Richmond, Virginia PAMELA KAY HUMPHRIES OPINION BY v. Record No. 0877-22-2
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2017-07-27 · Published · cited 0×
EFiled: Jul 27 2017 02:06PM EDT Transaction ID 60906016 Case No. 2017-0018-JRS IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD L. SALBERG, M.D. and : DAVID PINKOSKI, : : Plaintiffs, :
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001-11-07 · Published · cited 15× · 2002 WI App 26; 641 N.W.2d 461; 249 Wis. 2d 743; 2001 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1142
249 Wis.2d 743 (2001) 2002 WI App 26 641 N.W.2d 461 Thomas M. TEUBEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,[†] v. PRIME DEVELOPMENT, INC. and Robert B. Clemen, Defendants-Respondents, Randy L. FIORE, Defendant. No. 01-1098. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs October 17, 2001. Decided November 7, 2001
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-08-12 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TRUE HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC, No. 22-15710 INC.; MCLAUGHLIN CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATES, D.C. No. INC., individually and as 4:13-cv-02219- representatives of a class of similarly HSG situated persons, Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER v. MCKESSON CORPORATION; MCKESSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellants. T
Reichel v. Jungpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000-06-14 · Published · cited 3× · 2000 WI App 151; 616 N.W.2d 118; 237 Wis. 2d 853; 2000 Wisc. App. LEXIS 570
237 Wis.2d 853 (2000) 2000 WI App 151 616 N.W.2d 118 IN the MATTER OF the ESTATE OF Ronald E. JUNG, Deceased: (L.C. #97-PR-223) Teresa REICHEL, Timothy A. Jung, Thomas L. Jung, Tamara Hall and Todd Jung, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Dianne JUNG, Defendant-Respondent. No. 99-1211. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002-11-20 · Published · cited 1× · 2002 WI App 310; 655 N.W.2d 495; 259 Wis. 2d 316; 2002 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1266
259 Wis.2d 316 (2002) 2002 WI App 310 655 N.W.2d 495 COLUMBUS PARK HOUSING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF KENOSHA, Defendant-Appellant.[†] No. 02-0699. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs September 12, 2002. Decided November 20, 2002.
District Court, N.D. California · 2002-01-10 · Published · cited 3× · 204 F. Supp. 2d 1236; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8655; 2002 WL 1008479
204 F.Supp.2d 1236 (2002) Robert L. DAVIS and Joseph D. Hom, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PACIFIC BELL, Defendant. Orlando Arce and Arce Enterprises, LLC, dba "Jet International Travel," individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Pacific Bell, Defendant. Nos. C 01-2680 SI, C 01-0585 SI. United States District Court,
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2006-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 464 F. Supp. 2d 588; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80970; 2006 WL 3199448
464 F.Supp.2d 588 (2006) SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE, L.P., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARTHUR COLLINS, INC., Defendant. Civ.A. No. 3:04-CV-0669-B. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. November 2, 2006. *589 H. Kenneth Prol, Willem G. Schuurman, Adam V. Floyd, Michael J. Smith, Vinson & Elkins, Austin, TX, Bi
Michigan Supreme Court · 2003-06-17 · Published · cited 76× · 662 N.W.2d 695; 468 Mich. 388
662 N.W.2d 695 (2003) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, also known as AFSCME, doing business as AFSCME Local 23 and AFSCME Local 2394, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Detroit City Council, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DETROIT and Detroit Housing Commission, Defendants-Appellees. Docket Nos. 122053, 122091, Calendar No. 9. Supreme Court of Michigan.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-06-29 · Published · cited 5× · 146 N.Y.S.3d 481; 195 A.D.3d 569; 2021 NY Slip Op 04106
Mees v Stibbe N.Y. B.V. (2021 NY Slip Op 04106) Mees v Stibbe N.Y. B.V. 2021 NY Slip Op 04106 Decided on June 29, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Ju
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999-10-26 · Published · cited 10× · 190 F.R.D. 385; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20186; 1999 WL 1293034
ORDER ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court on defendant IBM Corporation’s motion to (1) bifurcate the trial into separate liability and damage phases and (2) stay discovery of the willfulness and damage issues. Plaintiff vigorously opposes the motion in every aspect. This a patent case first filed in the Northern District of Illinois. P
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-15-00219-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/19/2015 8:06:13 PM
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004-09-27 · Published · cited 108× · 385 F.3d 159
385 F.3d 159 FIRST CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. and Willem Oost-Lievense, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,v.SATINWOOD, INC., Sphinx Rock, N.V., Ahmed Vahabzadeh, Sohrab Vahabzadeh, Afiwa, S.A., Afsar Vahabzadeh, Savco, S.A., and the Estate of Soleyman Vahabzadeh, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,Brickellbush, Inc., Manco, Inc., Manou Failly, Cimbalo Investments, B.V., Sotar Investments, B.V., Jens Schlegelmilch, Youssef V
District Court, S.D. New York · 2002-03-13 · Published · cited 9× · 189 F. Supp. 2d 101; 62 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1879; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4110; 2002 WL 393087
189 F.Supp.2d 101 (2002) BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC, Plaintiffs, v. PRODIGY COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendants No. 00 CIV 9451 CM. United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 13, 2002. *102 *103 *104 Albert J. Breneisen, Benjamin Hershkowitz,
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002-10-06 · Published · cited 5× · 652 N.W.2d 240; 252 Mich. App. 293
652 N.W.2d 240 (2002) 252 Mich. App. 293 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, aka AFSCME, d/b/a AFSCME MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25, AFSCME Local 23, and AFSCME Local 2394, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Detroit City Council, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF DETROIT and Detroit Housing Commission, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Docket No. 241606.
District Court, D. Delaware · 2002-04-19 · Published · cited 1× · 199 F. Supp. 2d 197; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7308; 2002 WL 724224
199 F.Supp.2d 197 (2002) NEXELL THERAPEUTICS, INC., Becton Dickinson and Company, and the Johns Hopkins University, Plaintiffs, v. AMCELL CORPORATION, Miltenyi Biotech, Inc., and Miltenyi Biotech GmbH, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 00-141-RRM. United States District Court, D. Delaware. April 19, 2002. Phillip A. Rovner, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, Delawa
Roth v. Reyespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-06-05 · Published · cited 4× · 567 F.3d 1077; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12509; 2009 WL 1564228
567 F.3d 1077 (2009) Andrew E. ROTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gregory REYES; Michael Byrd; Antonio Canova; Jack Cuthbert; Brocade Communication System, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-16805. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 12, 2009. Filed June 5, 2009. *1078 Willem F. J