Cases

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any Jan 31 2020, 6:18 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeals

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Jun 29 2018, 6:36 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK regarded as precedent or cited before any Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 7, 2006 ROBERT L. MOORE v. GLENN TURNER, WARDEN Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County No. 9769 Joseph H. Walker, III, Judge No. W2005-01995-CCA-R3-HC - Filed February 28, 2006 The petitioner, Robert L. Moore, filed in the Hardeman County Circuit Cour

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Keenan, J.) denying class certification under Fed. R. Civ. P 23(b)(3). Plaintiffs based their RICO and fraud claims on the oral misrepresentations made by PaineWebber’s brokers, arguing that PaineWebber engaged in a common scheme to misrepresen

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs, Robert L. Moore and Jeannette S. Parry, claim that PaineWebber, Inc., the defendant, disguised a life insurance policy as an investment package similar to an Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”), thereby tricking them into buying life insurance with funds that they would otherwise have used for IRAs or similar investments. Moore and Parry brought suit under the Racketeer Influenced an

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

MATHIAS, J. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. RILEY, J., Concurs. MAY, J., Concurs.

WEICK, Circuit Judge. Boatland and Moore have appealed from an interlocutory order of the District Court, certified pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), granting partial summary judgment in favor of Brunswick. The sole issue in the appeal is whether or not the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law, Wis.Stat.Ann. §§ 135.01 et seq., <

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs October 6, 2015 FREDERICK L. MOORE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-14-174 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge No. W2015-00626-CCA-R3-ECN - Filed November 6, 2015 _____________________________ Frederick L. Moore (“the Petitioner”) f

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. In this civil action, Plaintiffs are a group of retired employees, their spouses, and their union, who allege that their former employer, Defendant Menasha Corporation (“Menasha”), violated the terms of two collective bargaining agreements (“CBA”s) by denying the employees and their spouses lifetime vested healthcare coverage fo

MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Modern cell phones are more than' just phones. Because they contain “a broad array of private information,” a warrant is generally required before a cell phone may be searched. 1 That is why the officer in this case obtained a warrant for Robert Anthony Moore’s cell

OPINION DAVID R. FARMER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ALAN E. HIGHERS, P.J., W.S., and HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., joined. Plaintiffs, eight Shelby County registered voters, filed an action for declaratory judgment challenging the constitutionality of the 2012 Senate Reapportionment Act on the

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 3, 2009 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE ex rel. ROBERT L. WOLFENBARGER, III., et al., v. SCOTT MOORE, et al. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 171426-2 Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood, Sr. Judge No. E2008-02545-COA-R3-CV - FILED FEBRUARY 12, 2010 Sixteen "citizen plaintiffs" filed this

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 12-CF-825, 12-CF-1007 CURTIS L. MCKNIGHT and ROBERT H. PUMPHREY, APPELLANTS, v. UNIT

Robert L. Moore ("the husband") and Annie Lou Williams Moore ("the wife") were divorced by judgment dated March 2, 2000. The trial court ordered an appraisal of the parties' major assets — the marital residence, an adjoining vacant lot, and a day-care center owned by both parties and operated by the wife, and ordered the equity split equally between the parties. Neither party appealed from the judgment, and the wife, pursuant to a provision in the judgment, purchased the husband's equ

02/03/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 21, 2025 Session DONALD K. MOORE, JR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County Nos. 96-C-1428, 96-C-1423 Angelita Blackshear Dalton, Judge ___________________________________

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Angeline Caudell Glass sued Robert L. Martin, alleging that Martin, while logging on property adjacent to hers, had intentionally trespassed on her land and cut her timber. The complaint, which sought compensatory and punitive damages, *Page 2 stated a single claim of trespass. There were no claims alleging conversion or seeking statutory penalties pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 35-14-1. Martin denied the allegati

ORDER PER CURIAM. Ace Logistics, L.L.C., appeals two rulings of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding in favor of Robert Moore. The rulings are consolidated for purposes of appeal. Ace Logistics contends that the Commission (1) erred in finding Moore was an employee and in awarding wage credits to Moore as the record lacked sufficient evidence to support the award; and (2) erred

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.