Cases

MURDOCK, Justice (concurring specially), The main opinion notes that Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc., and Morgan Asset Management, Inc. (“MAM”), argue for the “affirmance of the trial court’s order on an alternative ground that was presented to the trial court but that was not relied upon by the trial court.” 190 So.3d at 908. Quoting McMillan, Ltd. v. Warrior Drilling & Engineering Co., 512

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment [40]. I. BACKGROUND Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. (“Morgan Keegan” or “Defendant”) is a Memphis, Tennessee investment firm with over 1,200 brokers and 300 offices throughou

678 F.3d 1233 (2012) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORGAN KEEGAN & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 11-13992. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 2, 2012. *1235 Tracey Hardin, U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, Robert

10/07/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 4, 2025 LAILA RUMSEY v. REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN TRUST, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 23-1004-II Anne C. Martin, Chancellor No

2022 IL App (2d) 190495 No. 2-19-0495 Opinion filed December 29, 2022 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ In re MARRIAGE OF

GRITZNER, District Judge. Plaintiffs John W. Cromeans, Robert Benisch, and Elkton Bank and Trust Company (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), class representatives, appeal the district court’s 3 denial of their motion to enforce the settlement agreement in a securities class action, as well as the district court’s denial of a

10/09/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 5, 2018 Session JOSEPH PETER MEERSMAN, JR. ET AL. v. REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN TRUST ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 15C1861 Joseph P. Binkley, Jr., Judge

741 F.Supp.2d 844 (2010) In re REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN ERISA LITIGATION. Terry Hamby, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc., et al., Defendants. No. 08-2192. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. June 30, 2010. *847 Derek W. Loeser, Lynn L. Sarko, Margaret E. Wetherald, Karin B. Swope, K

SUAREZ, J. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

692 F.Supp.2d 944 (2010) In re REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN ERISA LITIGATION. Terry Hamby, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc., et al., Defendants. No. 08-2192. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. March 9, 2010. *948 Lynn L. Sarko, Derek W. Loeser, Margie E. Wetherald, Sarah Kimberly, Kel

547 F.3d 1307 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert McNEESE, a.k.a. Bobby, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-10093 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. November 3, 2008. Mark C. Meyer (Court-Appointed), Kinnamon, Russo, Meyer & Keegan, Cedar Rapids, IA, for McNeese. Linda Julin McNamara, Tampa, FL, fo

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 12–1758 Filed August 16, 2013 STATE OF IOWA, Appellant, vs. JEFFREY K. RAGLAND, Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie County, Timothy O’Grady, Judge. The State appeals the district court’s refusal to sentence defendant in accordance with the Governor’s commutation order. AFFIRMED. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Thoma

John J. McConnell, Jr., United States District Judge *186Plaintiffs Maria Walker and David Walker ("the Walkers") moved in limine, under Rule 803(6) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, seeking to exclude certain language in medical records indicating: (1) a reference range for normal carboxyhemoglobin levels in adults (0.0-9.0%), and (2) a reference range for the populati

829 F.Supp. 1507 (1993) PULLER MORTGAGE ASSOCIATES, INC. and Kenneth A. Puller, Plaintiffs, v. Larry A. KEEGAN, Defendant. No. IP 90-239 C. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. April 30, 1993. *1508 *1509 Richard S. Ewing, Stewart & Irwin, Indianapolis, IN, fo

Gants, J. Three utility companies (utilities) challenge orders entered against them by the Department of Public Utilities (department) that impose monetary penalties for failing to “restore service to [their] customers in a safe and reasonably prompt manner,” in violation of 220 Code Mass. Regs. § 19.03(3) (2010), after electrical outages arising from Tropical Storm Irene (Irene) on August 28, 2011, and a snowstorm two months la

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 111 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2023 November 16, 2023 NICOLE WARD f/k/a NICOLE BELDEN and ANDY WARD, Appellants (Respondents), S-23-0007 v. BRETT BELDEN and ISABEL BELDEN, Appellees (Petitioners).

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Supplemental Class Action Complaint for Violation of ERISA. Defendants Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. (“Morgan Keegan”) and Morgan Asset Management (“MAM”) filed a Motion to Dismiss on April 10, 2009. Also on April 10

399 F.Supp.2d 821 (2005) LYLE ENTERPRIZES, INC. d/b/a Larry's Foodland, a Michigan corporation, Plaintiff, v. The HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION AND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 04-73136. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. November 18, 2005. *822 Kenneth F. Neuman and Leif K. Anderson, Nathan,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL JOHN E. WAITES, US Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Compel filed by Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. and Keith E. Meyers (collectively, “MK Defendants”). The MK Defendants seek an order compelling Robert F. Anderson, as Chapter 7 Trustee for Infinity Business Group, Inc. (“Trustee”) to provide full and complete disclosure of certain document

BAXTER, J., Concurring and Dissenting. Though my reasons differ from the majority’s, I agree with their conclusion that the “illegal act” exclusion in Safeco’s policy did not deprive Kelly S.’s parents of liability coverage for their son’s fatal shooting of Christopher Mitchell. I respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s determination that, despite the policy’s explicit refusal